Palomar Hotel
Tasted Thursday, September 22, 2011 by tooch with 1,047 views
Went to the Winebow trade tasting.
Hot nose with a surprising dryness borderlining on tannic. Thought this had some nice herbal notes with some yellow fruits.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Fruity nose but incredibly dry on the palate. Not a huge fan of Muscat, but this made me take notice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Limestone soils with bright fruit and nice minerals. Thought this had a subtle sweetness to it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Dense nose of brown sugar, smoke, and dried herbs. Palate wasn't as dense, but had an oaky character with charcoal, subtle chocolate, and dried herbs.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Sweet kirsch, brambles, and warm spices on the nose. Palate was incredibly smooth with dense mocha, cloves and charcoal.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Almost too polished...like looking at a air-brushed model. Palate was smooth with plenty of weight. Dark mocha, espresso, and charcoal.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Another incredibly polished, smooth Sangiovese. Lots of coffee, dried herbs, lavender and chocolate on the palate with dark fruits.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Another example of a wine that comes across almost too polished. For such a young wine this already seems pretty well resolved with chocolate, dark berries, tar and spice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
In contrast to the other Brunello's from Altesino this was a different beast. I was greeted with an brick wall of tannin...reminded me of chewing on a wool sweater. It had some dark berry and mocha tones behind the wall, but it was really hard to assess this given it's current state.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
More approachable than the 2004 Montosoli. This had a tarter fruit profile, with interesting herbal undertones - I was shocked how reserved this was after the 2004.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
This was drank after a sampling of the 2004 and 2006 Brunello's from Altesino. Compared to those monsters, this was medium-bodied and almost elegant in comparison. While still showing some typical mocha and herbs, this had a lighter fruit profile...cranberry maybe, instead of black raspberry in the brunello's.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
White florals, subtle melon and bright acidity. Nice, simple white wine!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A bit denser and more structured than the Argiolas Costamolino. This had noticeable wood that masked the melon and herbs that cowered behind it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Nice wine. Lavender tones, with chalky minerals and herbs. Could see myself drinking a lot of this on my porch.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Fresh white florals with honeydew and chalk. Pleasant, easy-drinking wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
From a blend of 60% Greco and 40% Malvasia. This sees a fair bit of oak which shows through on the nose with some spicy oak, and toast. Palate is pretty rich and has a lot of honeydew and herbs.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Incredibly simplistic.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Surprisingly complex for a prosecco. Good citrus, with some herbal and vanilla underneath.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted exactly like strawberry shortcake. Sweet, a bit clunky and lacking polish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Pretty simplistic with minerals, white florals, and citrus.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Nice minerality with fresh melons and white florals. Straightforward and enjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Despite being their higher end cuvee, I think the only difference I could sense was it saw more time in oak. The wine was a bit gloppy with butter and smoke. No thanks.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A lot of vanilla and honey but still fresh and lively. Nice balance and relatively comple.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Grown on limestone soils. This is rich and sappy with a good deal of honeydew.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Just a hint of sweetness with herbs and yellow fruit. Had some nice minerals and acidity.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
I hadn't known that Charles Joguet had a blanc, so I was eager to give this a try. This spends 10 months in oak, and it has dense almond and spice on the nose. Palate has rich florals....wine is medium-bodied. Pretty nice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Warm earth with pepper and some green notes. Thought this needs some time to improve as there was some heat on the palate.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Beautiful wine that spends 10 months in 4 to 5 year old oak barrels. Incredibly racy nose of spice, earth, and red berries. Thought this had polish and depth...will be quite a gem in a couple years.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Another brilliant wine from Joguet. This is from 35 year old vines planted on a gentle slope. Silky palate with peppers, blackberry, and lots of spices. Elegant, complex and thoroughly enjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Incredibly bright and floral with dense melon and herb tones. Thought this had nice complexity and was one of the better Bandol Blancs I've ever had.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Wild strawberry and bright acidity. Rather simplistic, but nonetheless enjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Fair amount of heat on this young Bandol. Dark fruits, spices, and some charcoal were the biggest components of the palate. This had some good complexity, so with time, I think it'll become more approachable.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Lean, smokey, and delicious! Nice dark fruit on the palate...enjoyed this very much.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
I've always had trouble with Banyuls. This had a lot of tar and raisins...not my favorite style of wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Very toasty nose with butter and spicy oak. Not my style of chardonnay, but I can see this being enjoyed by many people.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Incredibly minty wine...probably the first time I've come across such a minty chard. Almost thought I was drinking a Chateau Montelana!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tart cranberry, dusty herbs and some charcoal. Pretty nice wine!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Spicy raspberry on the nose with darker fruit on the palate. The palate was nice and spicy with good complexity.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Interesting nose of meat and anise. Palate showed some oak with lavender, dark fruits and subtle meat drippings.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Incredibly tannic. Couldn't really get past them. There was some sweet blackberry on the palate, but this was just not ready at all.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2010 Château Thivin Beaujolais Blanc 91 Points
France, Burgundy, Beaujolais
Incredibly chalky with nice floral and herbal tones. Love the precision and freshness of this wine...
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2008 Château Thivin Brouilly 89 Points
France, Burgundy, Beaujolais, Brouilly
Just a hair less focused and polished than the Cote de Brouilly. Had a wonderfully aromatic nose with lavender and spice - palate has a nice combination of red berries and chalk. Was a big fan of this.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2008 Château Thivin Côte de Brouilly 91 Points
France, Burgundy, Beaujolais, Côte de Brouilly
Great red berry nose with subtle mushroom and spice. Could have easily passed for a 1er Vosne. This had nice depth and was incredibly focused. Open for business with nice floral, mineral and red fruit tones on the palate. With all the hype around 2009, this is a sneaky wine that gives the 2009 a run for its money.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No