Dino
Tasted Thursday, July 26, 2012 by Keith Levenberg with 618 views
Probably the most smooth and drinkable of the wines today. Sweet five-spice scents and something caramelly on the nose; maybe that's the oak talking because I noticed a touch of woodiness on the palate and some brown sugar sweetness on the back end, but from a textural perspective this is extremely refined and gentle. Whatever primary fruit might have been here has turned into something non-fruity, leaving the general complexion of fruit but no actual fruit, if that makes any sense, and it's pretty deep and blackish in tone despite the wine's physical lightness.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Surprise, surprise, the most difficult wine on the table and sadly the one that ended the night with the most leftover in the bottle. It's the type of closed that's more accurately called dumb: it's not that it's tight, tannic, inside-out, or harsh, it's just that it's showing almost nothing at all. The nose is almost totally mute, all you get is a vague sense of something dusty. If I might've expected it to stand out from the other wines on account of Truchot's usual light touch, that wasn't the case here; maybe the rich vintage has kind of pumped it up. There's a tenderness to this which is easy to appreciate but unfortunately this one was a waste to open at this moment.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Ravishing aroma, easily the most impressive and powerful wine of the night, not that those two things need necessarily go hand in hand. I predicted this to be the most tannic and closed but in fact it had so much fruit concentration that it didn't seem tannic at all. The fruit was dark and rich but on the back end it almost seemed cool, with a mildly spearminty thing giving it lift.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Spritzy, and it needed a Mollydooker shake. After that it was pure fruit, with a burst of sweet berry flavor as if it were a pinot noir reduction sauce except it didn't come across thick in weight or verge over the line into being candied.
Read 2 Comments / Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Interesting contrast to the Combottes, this was by far the more red-fruited of the two and even had a touch of anise to it as well as something mealy. But that's not to say it was light and easy as this was one seriously solid wine, like Burgundy cast in concrete.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Pitch-black fruit complexion, a sharp contrast to the red-fruited Chaffots, and also easier to drink than the Chaffots as it was just a bit more saturating and less boxy. The acid was as much of a factor as the tannin in the structure here which made this a nicely linear Lignier.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Apricot nectar. Neither as sweet nor as slathering as these rieslaners from Muller-Catoir can be when they're young, but pretty tasty just the same.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2010 Edmond Vatan Sancerre Clos la Néore 90 Points
France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
Very different from the 2009. I imagine the alcohol must be lower, although I forgot to note the %, but in spite of that this comes across as the richer wine. The fruit flavors are deeper and the texture has an almost oily richness to it. The aromatics are pretty much as clean as can be with a scent that you could easily find in something from Bath & Body Works.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No