Restaurant Bottles, Sas van Gent
Tasted Saturday, September 22, 2012 by jkoenen with 1,522 views
14 participants, 16 vintages of these fabled wines. And some ringers, of course.
All (red) wines tasted single blind: we knew what was coming, but not in what order.
All wines were popped and decanted immediately before the flight was served.
Served blind
A very instructive and impressive tasting. In my opinion it's very difficult to determine clear characteristics of both chateaux. Sometimes Montrose was more feminine and elegant than a stubborn and masculine Cos. A few wines later, it was the other way around: Cos seemed more lush and lascivious, while Montrose showed more traditional and austere. So no clear conclusions here.
At the end of the evening I had to admit that Cos surprised me, since I thought I had clear preferences for Montrose's supposed classical, ageworthy structure. Not. Now I know that both wines can be enormously impressive.
Furthermore we had some minor disappointments: both 03's, which performed sub-par, Montrose 89 and 90, which I thought were going to rock my world, and 2 corked Cosses.
On the other hand there were excellent showings from wines from so-called 'drinkers-vintages': 1994, 1999 and 2001. Superb stuff!
And Calon Segur can often keep up with its better known siblings!
Personal WOTN: 1982 Calon Ségur
Other wines to look out for: 99 and 08 Cos, 01 Montrose.
2005 Y de Yquem 92 Points
France, Bordeaux
Clear straw yellow. Oaky. And a whiff of oxidation. Lovely elegance and balance on the nose which is interesting and complex, not too dense. First impressions on the nose took me to traditional Trebbiano (Valentini?) or white Rhone (Beaucastel?).
Mouthfeel is young and vibrant, wonderful herbal impressions, ripe yellow fruit, nutty hints of oxidation. Quite heavily oaked, though. Sufficient acidity. Beautiful wine, yet hard to determine where it's from and also where it's going. The controversy between the young, vivid impressions and the hints of oxidation is intriguing, yet worries me a little. 18/20
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue