The Medlar, London
Tasted Thursday, May 2, 2013 by SimonG with 691 views
A pale (or rather, a darker) imitation of my last coupled glorious bottles of this. Quite a full gold. A little volatile and advanced on the nose. Quite rich, full. Nicely dry. Evolved but just about holding on. Good with the crab raviolo. Some heat coming through on the finish. ***
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Again, full gold. Slightly medicinal, honied nose. A pinch of herb. Dense, quite full, mineral edge. Full and long. More mineral through the mid-palate than the Lafon. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Pale gold. Nicely fresh nose, a touch of flint and smoke. Rounded, quite fat across the attack. Richer than the Sauzet initially tough it des tighten up after an hour or so, focussing and becoming more mineral. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Mid to full garnet. Sweet and savoury nose with an earthy depth. Almost a touch of orange peel. Sweet, mature. Very harmonious. Not tremendously complex but enough to keep this interesting. Lovely. Sediment is very minty. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Full garnet, almost dull ruby. Looks far younger than the Faiveley alongside. Tighter and more focused on the nose. A touch of orange juice. More focused on palate too. Redder fruit. Quite dry on the finish. Hasn't quite got the fruit to cover the acidity and relict tannin. Getting a tad astringent with air. Looks younger in the glass than the 98 Giradin CdlR. ***
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Cloudy. Mid garnet. Very sweet nose. Decay. Muddy. Prominent acidity. Some tannin in there too. Really don't think this is right. Out of condition. Volatile too.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Corked.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Red fruit. Quite tight and inexpressive initially. Bright red fruit and good acidity. Lean, a long distance runner as is the GE. A family style here. Needs time. Very much in the mineral, elegant mould. **(**)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Similar to the Vougeot, a little richer on the nose. Similar bright red fruit and vibrant acidity. Another long distance athlete. **(**)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Served blind. Sweeter, and a little richer in the caramel vein. Quite mellow and rich, some caramel across the middle. Fat and leggy. Fragrant, quite lifted. A softness to it. Well disguised for a burgundy, though to be fair it is made from the lees at the bottom of the barrel. A non-commercial blend of Chambertin and Charmes dregs. Fun but atypical. ***
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Deep ruby. Very dense. Polished and glossy. Modern. Full and rich. A touch of TCP on the nose. Not my thing but clearly making a statement. *** to **** depending.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Corked.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Lighter than the Arnoux. Full garnet. Very fragrant, floral, a little wild. Beautifully rounded and fragrant. Just on the right side of lush. Lovely. ****1/2
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Slightly lighter garnet, more evolved, a slightly minter nose. Nicely evolved. A little leaner than the Charmes. More trim. Elegant and long. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Served blind. Bien Nacido vineyard, Jill's Cuvée. Pale mid garnet. Quite evolved on the nose. Slightly sweaty, cabbages. Sweet fruit and a touch of caramel on the nose. Reminds me of an 89 Cathiard Aux Reignots on the palate, perhaps with a touch more caramel. Very nice indeed and very Burgundian. ****
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Mid ruby. Red fruit, a touch of mint, nicely focused and bright. Good red fruit. Focused without being in any way angular. Opens through the mid-palate. Quite long. Fresh finish. Lovely and showing well in the company. A long. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

1998 Pol Roger Champagne Blanc de Chardonnay 90 Points
France, Champagne
Nicely rich, creamy, slightly appley bready nose. A little spice and ginger sitting behind it. Quite rich and rounded through the front of the mid-palate. Finishes a little short with a nicely refined touch of honey. ***1/2
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No