Tasted Friday, September 27, 2013 by octopussy with 574 views
The Burgundy merchant around my corner only got Bertheau in his portfolio last year (with assorted 2008s and 2010s), but this year is the first year he got the full range, which we got to taste. As an introduction, we also had two 2011 Santenays from Bachelet-Monnot and David Moreau, the 2011 Bourgogne Le Chapitre from Sylvain Pataille. And then in the end, we also opened two well aged Rieslings. I had only tried the Chambolle Village and the 1er Cru from Francois Bertheau before (from 2008 and 2010, the 1er Cru also from 2011) and was very excited to also try the rest of Bertheau's wines.
I adore the Bachelet-Monnot whites, but I also like their reds, especially given their user-friendly price. I had bought the Santenay Charmes in 2009 and 2010. The 2011 wasn't as good though, it was a bit muted and somehow the fruit didn't seem to be as lively and fresh as it was in the two previous years. In our group, most preferred the Bachelet Monnot Santenay Charmes over the Santenay S from David Moreau. Even though they are a bit oaky and very fruit forward, I do like the David Moreau Santenays very much. The Santenay S seems to be shutting down already. Three months earlier it was much more lush and open.
I was told that except for the Marsannay L'Ancestrale, Sylvain Pataille considers his Bourgogne Le Chapitre from a vineyard already close to Dijon his best red. I tend to agree as I like this wine very, very much each year and maybe also even better than the Marsannays. This is excellent also in 2011 and I may even prefer the 2011 over the 2009 and 2010, but that could change again over time. In any case, this is a must-buy wine for me each year.
Three months earlier, the Tardy Chambolle-Musigny Les Athets was sort of disjointed, but it had only been delivered two weeks before, so this may have been due to transport shock. Now, it was much more balanced, but still not 100% harmonic. I bought a bottle of it, but will need to let it sit for at least 6 to 7 years. The 2011 Bertheau Chambolle Villages is very different in style, much more delicate, more red-fruited, more elegant, but also harder to pin down.
The 1er Crus and the Bonnes Mares from Francois Bertheau were all excellent, stylistically consistent, all very delicate, fine, but also a bit fragile and hard to pin down. I liked the gentle oriental spiciness in the Charmes and the Amoureuses, but between the Amoureuses and the Bonnes Mares, I preferred the latter as it had a little more meat on the bone and was easier to like for me. Between the Charmes and the 1er Cru (mix of vineyards), I also preferred the latter. The Charmes was excellent, but somehow the 1er Cru did it for me, it has an excellent structure and balance and lots of finesse whereas in the Charmes, the acidity and tannins stood out a bit too much for me.
A friend of mine had also brought two aged Rieslings he wanted me to try, so we opened them in the end. The 1975 Steinberger Auslese was quite hard work with its very strong caramel and botrytis notes and the 1988 von Schubert Herrenberg Spätlese was our absolute favorite, so pure, so precise, so vibrant. It seemed like freshly filled, but also had sort of invisible age notes, the kind of effect of bottle age that doesn't impair freshness, but adds extra complexity. This is Riesling in its purest form and for me heaven on earth.
2011 Domaine Bachelet-Monnot Santenay Les Charmes
France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Santenay
Dark red. In the nose a bit muted, dark berries, slight reduction and sulphur notes. Not that great. Better on the palate, again a bit sulphuric, lean, tart with prominent acidity. Slightly metallic finish. Gets better and more balanced with air. Still, I liked the 2009 and 2010 of this wine much better.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2011 David Moreau Santenay Cuvée S
France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Santenay
Medium cherry red. In the nose, this is earthy and slightly oaky, yet quite transparent and clear. It's got some elegance and a very fine raspberry note. Some solvent in the back end of the nose. On the palate, it's light, slightly edgy and tart, oaky as well. Very good again in the finish. Just three months earlier, this wine was much more open and round. Seems to shut down already.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No