Tasted Thursday, March 6, 2014 by LWI with 1,457 views
Wines were served by appellation, and we knew the content of the flight but not the order of the bottles. Premier crus and similar were decanted for about 6-8 hours, others a little less.
Blind. Deep fruit, some development, elegant smell; extreme length, but above this it is the intensity that carries the wine, almost peacock tail finish. Structured and fresh, well integrated tannins.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Blind. Deeply colored, sweet-and-sour and a bit one-dimensional smell, lots of dark berries; quite long, more dark berries in the mouth, somewhat extracted, simple finish.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Old drawer, champignon, cellar. Absolutely not right. Not corcked. 2 out of 2 misses with this wine, for different reasons.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Structured and subdued on the nose, very elegant on the nose; in the mouth it is very fresh, some bell peppers, pronounced but well integrated tannins. Most balanced and elegant. Extraordinary complex finish. Long life ahead.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Celllar, mushroom - and the cork became more evident after a while. Bummer. Beneath is a fresh wine with even some complexity forcing its way through the musty odors.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Tobacco, big fruit; It boasters a warm, earthy, and complex tastes. Still, very fresh, even some minerals, good tannins, structured, very good length. Not exactly a charmer, but a very good and food friendly wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Very detailed aromas of camphor and spice, intriguing, minerals/smoke, some xtoc notes – a nose to delve in; not quite as intriguing in the mouth, long, fresh, a bit lacking in the finish, moderate body only
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. deeply colored, lots of minerals and bonfire smoke on the nose, very fine indeed, dark fruited, something hints at this being a bit closed; warm in the mouth, very fresh and deep dark fruit, very nicely balanced, most full bodied.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Dark and more developed than others; warm mouth, wonderful finish, expansive, high extraction - but still on the fresh side.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Simpler than the others, decent length, warm and charming, fresh, Ok finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Corked
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Minerals and black currants, some smoke; violent fruit attack inn the mouth - well balanced with acid and tannins,lot fruit sweetness (but not sweet in any way), fresh and ling. Very intense. Wonderful wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Warmish presentation, verging on 'boiled', peculiar, some smoke and minerals, not very expressive, but a good West Bank wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Slightly exotic and fine-grained nose; dark berries, smoke, a bit on the extracted side, very convincing, powerful and structured.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Very good wine, but not too complex, slightly bretty, warmish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Corked. Very impressive wine beneath, sappy dark fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Wonderful sweet-and-sour deep dark fruit, some mint, minerals and black currants, smokey, very complex; Even better in the mouth, unbelievable length, fresh, still some tannins – but not overly so and they are well integrated. The most impressive characteristic was an absolutely stunning finish.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Very good nose, a lot to like, exotic, some old wood, hint of forest floor and bonfire; fresh taste, slightly sweet, some development, a bit short and lacking a bit in concentration.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Some brett, a bit exotic, both sweet and fresh in the mouth, moderate length, lacking in complexity.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Blind. Most primary, fresh black currents, some complexity on the nose; powerful and intense, fresh, a slight burned note, slightly warm fruit.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Blind. Developed color, warm on the nose mixed with some greenness; violent acidity, sweet fruit, peculiar, a bit short, tannic finish. A good mouth full.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Exotic and deep, spicy, some brett; the wine is not completely integrated, and there is a gap between sweet fruit and sweetness. Not overly complex.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Very dark. Sweet fruit, warmish, not the longest, drying finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Darkly colored; orange peel and marzipan, some roasted almonds, exotic spices; burned sugar, moderate acidity, moderate length, some alcohol, but a wonderful fullness and a very fine finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. Fresh, citrusy, intriguing nose with little botrytis, very clean wine, lacking a bit in intensity.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. The lightest in color, by far, in the flight. Curious soapy when first smelled, but this blew off. Varnish, not the richest, but very elegant, clean and well balanced, extreme finish. Wowsa. I suspected this to be the Yquem, and this was a much less developed bottle than previous ones.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Deeply spiced, varnish, fresh and long, on the comaratively sweet side, full yet elegant. A steal.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
We had our share of non-optimal bottles. Margaux, St. Julien and Pauillac impressed us. Some of the lesser wines performed very well. The freshness and structure were impressive across the board. The 1990 is a vintage were some wines have entered their drinking window, but the tasting should really be repeated in 10-25 years.
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

1990 Château La Fleur-Pétrus 88 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Blind. Dark fruit with some depth, otherwise a bit shy nose, a hint of spice; moderate length and fullness, good balance, drying finish, a bit bell pepper (some CF here?). Thought it was La Croix de Gay. Dissapointing.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
1990 Château La Conseillante 91 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Wonderful sweet-and sour smell, spice, deep fruit; Alas, only moderate body but good length, merely a hint of sweetness. Slim and elegant. There was a hint of TCA initially which grew in the glass and dominated the fruit after a while. Thus, there should be considerably better bottles out there.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
1990 Château Gazin Pomerol 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Blind. very ripe blackcurrant os the nose, clear/linear smalle; More rounded in the mouth, balanced and with fresh acidity and correct tannic finnish. Abundance of dark berries, although it is slightly on the extracted side it is still intense and food friendly.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
1990 Château La Croix de Gay 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Blind. Pronounced swet-and-sour smell, also a bit one-dimensional; good middle part of the tasting curve, moderate length, a bit simplistic.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No