Tasted Saturday, July 12, 2014 by odds with 723 views
It all started because I could not decide whether 2008 or 2009 should be opened first. When I called a friend, it turned out he had a similar problem just with the 2006 and 2007. From that point on, the way to a vertical was pretty much set. As more people joined, it became easier to extended the vertical and make it a wonderful night and a great learning experience. Thank you all!
So, we gathered on a Saturday night in a non disclosed location at the midst of Greenwich Village to reach some conclusions. Ten people, fifteen bottles, and three course meal. Let the wine go on the stage :-)
The overall votes were
Flight 1- Three for '03, seven for '04 (I voted '03 but at the end of the evening- once the '04 evolved, I would have voted '04)
Flight 2- four for '06, two for '07, and four for '08 (tie)
Flight 3- five for '09, three for '10, and two for '11
Flight 4- great NV :)
Flight 5- six for '09 special selection, two for '10 special selection, two abstains.
That said, the important lessons for me were that the EMH Cabs have a clear 'signature' line that goes across all the vintages, and that each of them can be a 'star' of the show on its own (and that I have now to go and see if I can find some '09 special)
2003 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat 93 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley
First thing- very interesting nose, feels the fresh and pepper(ish) background. More of the chocolate and a bit less of the rose/berries on the palate. Nice oak on the background. For me, it was a very nice long finish (medium long finish). Can be easily drank for five or six more years. maybe more in proper storage. But, why wait?
My WOTF, three votes for WOTF. (flight postscript to follow). 93 at tasting in the flight. 93-4 later in the evening.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat 93 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley
This one was learning experience in decanting.
On my initial notes- mature, nice finish, very lively. More fruit on the palate than the '03, less of the chocolate and minerals (which the '03 impressed me with). I was pretty certain that the lady would vote for this one but we weren't able to test it (see below)
Audience response to this one was WOW. Seven votes for WOTF. I did not say it was not, I said initially it was close to the '03 but the '03 was more impressive. I changed my mind later--
Post script: I meant to test it again at home late tonight [but the late 'draggers' and I have tried it again and again at NS until it was over. ]
The '04 opened up over the course of the evening and became a real WOW wine for me as well. All in, with longer finish, and the secondary tasting and minerals did open up. By the end of the evening, it was a brand new wine for me (I could have called it '04 special selection).
Vote at flight: 92. Vote later: 94. Well done, Merrill! If only I had a bottle of this one.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat 90 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley
It was very nice, but along with the black cat '03 and '04 on the same flight, it simply did not stand a chance. The nose did develop more as I got back to it later in the evening. But, I would say it this one is much stronger on the fruits compared with the '03/'04. I was waiting for those mineral tastes to develop but they showed up later in the evening. I guess more decanting for this one is necessary.
89-90 at 'flight' 90-91 later in the evening. I plan to drink it again in the future, and hopefully decant it more. I think this one has long life ahead. But compared with the other wines in the flight, it is not standing a fair chance.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No