La Trompette, London
Tasted Thursday, October 16, 2014 by SimonG with 697 views
Blind. Beautifully sweet and fragrant initially, then it tightens up. Becomes a bit dusty on the nose. Quite a full dense ruby in colour. Grippy. Needs time. The nose very dusty after it's initial charm. Far more surly than a lovely bottle last year. **(**) ?91
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Paler, more of a garnet. Quite floaty and fragrant. Lighter with soft spice. Good acidity and a bit of gentle decay. Easy going but none the worse for that. ***
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Deeper colour again, quite dense. Spicy and dark-fruited on the nose. Good acidity. Dense and quite plush fruit. Still some dry tannin on the finish. Quite long. ***(*) ?91
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Full garnet to a muddy ruby core. Spicy. Some evolution and a little VA. Soft velvet with a broken glass spine. Then it tightens further and becomes dry and surly. One for the masochists. Bare *** with fingers crossed. ?86
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Paler. Quite light and bright sweet fruit. A touch of confiture. Chambolle fragrance. A little easy and simple in the greater scheme of things, but not very 95 and not a surly brute, so very drinkable. top *** 89 Shows more simply than previous bottles from the case.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Again, a touch of lift here. Deeper colour. Full and quite dense ruby. Good fruit on the mid-palate with a little dryness on the finish. Nose a bit dark and muddy. Sweetens up with air, but still needs time. Could be really quite pretty. **** 92
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Dark ruby. Very dense. Licorice. Very dense and chewy. It does lighten a little, but also develops a beef stock nose. Not showing much charm. ***(*) ?91 in time.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Full, slightly smoky. Quite a dense ruby. Nicely fragrant with a density to the fruit. Quite plush through the mid palate with a slightly dry finish. Nicely dense. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Another dense, quite plush, dark, red-fruited nose. Very smooth. Again, just a touch of dryness on the finish. Started off quite showy but can't quite keep it going. Not sure. ***1/2
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A little mute on the nose with a touch of dust. Dense, quite dark fruit. Reasonably plush but again, it tightens up. ***1/2
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A full on, extracted, herbal nose. With air it lifts and shows a hauntingly pretty fragrance. Quite full and round on the palate. This is really growing on me. Breathes-up well. Lovely. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Nicely petrolly nose. Very intense.beautiful balancing acidity. ****1/2
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Far fuller in colour, mid amber. Very barley sugar on the nose with a peachy sweetness. Heavier and fuller. Sweet but some balance here. **** 92
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Deep orange, almost brown. Didn't really get a chance to taste this.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
On the whole, very 95. Not particularly pretty or gracious, though some decent, if not top flight, bottles. The GCs showed their breeding, the premiers were more variable. Thanks to F for herding, and to all for their bottles and company.
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

1995 Pol Roger Champagne Vintage Brut
France, Champagne
Mid straw. Quite a full, rich, slightly oxidative nose. A touch of ginger and mushroom. Palate a bit flat and one dimensional. Almost a little shrill. Problematic, possibly corked. Apparently this cleaned up and filled out on the palate after a couple of hours, so maybe just needed to relax in the glass. NR.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
1996 Pol Roger Champagne Vintage Brut 92 Points
France, Champagne
Similar colour. A touch more honey on the nose. A little more energy too. Rounder and a little richer on the palate. In good condition. Decent zip on the finish. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
1998 Benoît Lahaye Champagne Grand Cru Brut Millésimé 91 Points
France, Champagne, Champagne Grand Cru
Lots of CO2 on the nose. Seems very fresh. Nice and linear. Lovely minerality and fresh acidity on the finish. Nose develops to show a touch of yeast, and curiously, ripe avocado. Very decent in a contrasting style to the Pol. ****
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No