Tasted Thursday, December 4, 2014 by SimonG with 536 views
A tasting at home for some friends and colleagues from work. This year I chose a series of varieties, and three examples of each with a cheaper, middle and more expensive option in each flight with the aim of seeing which people preferred. Served blind in threes by (declared) grape variety, in random price order.
A pretty clear progression qualitatively. Preferences varied with the stylistic rather qualitative differences.
The more expensive and the middle wines stood out here. I preferred the Fourrier for a bit more mineral cut, but most liked the smoothness and seemingly lower acidity of the Farrago.
Another clear correlation between price and quality.
Not much between the cheapest and middle wines, but the more expensive Nada a clear step up.
The Imperial stood out for its complexity, helped by maturity. Qualitatively, not much in it between the middle and cheapest options.
Really toothsome, food-friendly showing for the generic wine, and a clear step up to the other two, with a bit more left bank complexity coming through in the Tertre which really divided opinion. Not one for new world Merlot drinkers perhaps.
This didn't go strictly with price, though the Swiss franc probably skews things a bit.
NV Sainsbury's Champagne Blanc de Noirs Brut 89 Points
France, Champagne
Magnum. Now getting close to 24 months post-purchase ageing and this is really singing. Stunning value at the £22.50 paid. Fresh and bright still, showing a little richer with air than the mag opened back in January. Really comes in to its own by about day three! Smooth, creamy and a lovely precision and freshness. ***
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No