Recette
Tasted Sunday, March 1, 2015 by coremill with 634 views
Really good and very fresh, with zippy acidity and lots of Chablis mineral character. Preferred this slightly to the 09 Forest alongside.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Served next to the 04, I slightly preferred the 04. This is richer and riper and denser, very brothy and savory, touch of honey, the mineral edge is there but this is less racy and classic. Quite developed actually,I don't see this making old bones and if this bottle is representative this is not a wine I would hold for the long haul.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Very pretty. Mature soft baked apple pastry, some mushroom, touch of white chocolate and earth. Has reached that nice old champagne stage where the structure has mellowed and integrated. Lovely champagne, even if I'm not quite moved by it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A very nice Puligny. Ripe orchard fruit, nice Puligny floral character, not exactly racy but enough acidity to balance the ripeness of the vintage and a just a kiss of minerals on the back end. Delicious.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Very Nuitsy, with dark fruit and earth and iron. Has just a trace of 98 bitterness, but the tannins are well integrated and not drying. Shows less Vosne spice character than this vineyard sometimes does, and not as elegant as M-G wines can be, but still good. I'm not a big fan of the 98 vintage character, but I liked this.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Really lovely mature nose, with dark plummy fruit (showing the vineyard's Morey proximity) and lots of forest and earth and tea, almost an old woody character. Fully integrated and mature, structure is mostly resolved. Outshone a bit by what came after but I really liked this.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Very ripe plummy fruit, quite ripe for the vintage, with lots minty and spicy stem character and a light vanilla edge from the oak. Very Dujac. The nose is extremely expressive and absolutely wonderful. Still very young on the palate, medium bodied, the oak and the structure have not quite integrated yet and the tannins are a touch chalky. Very, very good now but needs more time in bottle, this may have been just a bit shutdown. Not nearly as mature or texturally refined at this stage as a recent 2000.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Really quite lovely. Certainly very ripe, with sweet, concentrated blackberry fruit, but without the overripe roasted quality that many wines have in this vintage. Rich and powerful but not heavy. Not super complex, but still excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Poured next to the 99, and both were outstanding, and quite similar. Super pure, ripe raspberries and spice, with the 02 just a little riper and fresher and the 99 a tad redder in character and more integrated. But they were clearly variations on the same theme, and both have an incredible textural refinement with lush, super-silky tannins. Both were an absolute joy and my co-WOTNs.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Poured next to the 02, and both were outstanding, and quite similar. Super pure, ripe raspberries and spice, with the 02 just a little riper and fresher and the 99 a tad redder in character and more integrated. But they were clearly variations on the same theme, and both have an incredible textural refinement with lush, super-silky tannins. Both were an absolute joy and my co-WOTNs.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
I was getting fatigued at this point, and wasn't able to give this much attention or get much of a read on it as I was focusing more on other wines. But I noted a red-fruit aspect that is unusual in 90s and was surprised at its freshness.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Slow-oxed about four hours. Fresh and nowhere near mature. Refined red fruit, medium weight, good midpalate sap, underlying earthy character, some chalky tannins and high 96 acidity. A really good wine that doesn't quite have the textural refinement of a high-end grand cru (yet?) and needs some more time to resolve the structure.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
At first, quite special, with mature, wonderful red fruit and lots of tertiary nuance, in a rich but totally integrated package. But with air the fruit faded and it picked up a slightly roasted quality. Someone referenced a coffee flavor and that made sense to me. It still kept the richness and textural distinction but as the flavor profile lost its fruit it started to seem slightly over the hill. Still an excellent wine, but this bottle was perhaps not quite hitting the heights that this wine is known for.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Just had a small taste of this at the end of the night. Weird stuff. Very volatiley/plastic-y, very oxidative, yellow fruit, the fortification shows some, but it didn't show much sweetness to me. I didn't especially like this but it did go well with a bite of cheese.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

1996 A. Margaine Champagne Blanc de Blancs Special Club
France, Champagne
Small pour of this. Very nice BdB. Green apple, lemon, doughy, chalky, drinks very clean. Not much tertiary development, still seems young for a 96.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
NV Jacques Selosse Champagne Brut Rosé
France, Champagne
Disgorged 25 October 2011. A little funky, touch of reduction? Orange/grapefruit citrus, light red berries, very earthy, very light bubbles, a vinous style of rose. Doesn't make much palate impact but then has sneaky, extraordinary length. Very interesting wine that I had trouble fully understanding.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No