Jason's House
Tasted Saturday, November 12, 2022 by I'd Rather Be Drinking Wine with 107 views
A small group got together to share some wine and play some poker...the purpose was to introduce Marvin to some other friends. Joe brought his wife and James and Carrie came over, we were joined by two of my nieces, one who Marvin met at the two previous tastings and one of her sisters who was visiting from Miami. A fun night filled with some pretty remarkable wines!
OK....let me start by saying that how often can you go out to gamble and go home with what you came with? Doesn't that kind of make everyone a winner? My fault, we got so caught up on the wine, we forgot poker until the end of the night, and by then it was let's just open an Yquem! That's just like winning at poker, isn't it?!?! Cheers!
2006 Pol Roger Champagne Vintage Brut 92 Points
France, Champagne
A great start to a fun night....was suppose to be poker and wine, but somehow we never got to the poker part! This Champagne showed off the 2006 vintage, which was excellent. Lots of toast and tart apple, some citrus and some sea shell notes. The Champagne had nice acidity and fruit, and was drinking way above its price point, IMO. 92 Points. I don't see this improving much, but no rush to drink either.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2006 Billecart-Salmon Champagne Cuvée Nicolas François Billecart 94 Points
France, Champagne
This Champagne was very tasty and more intense than the 2006 Pol Rogers, but with a similar profile, i.e., Brioche/yeast, tart green apple and citrus with lively acid and lots of sea shell/saline minerality. A nice Champagne to sip on, and great addition to the tasting. Nice mousse too, and the lift and fruit had you coming back for another sip! A solid 94. No hurry on drinking these!
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2008 Louis Roederer Champagne Cristal Brut 97 Points
France, Champagne
A great Champagne! I liked this much better than the 2005 we had, but it is a matter of preference. I found this Champagne Champagne just had a little more of everything, i.e., more fruit, more acidity, more minerality and more mousse, with a more silky and creamy mouthfeel than the 2005, although the 2005 was still drinking remarkably well. To me, this showed the pedigree of the vintage. I do agree with another taster that it was slightly behind previous bottles, but still absolutely stunning. 2008 Cristal is my benchmark Champagne, and this was not quite up to previous other bottles. I am not sure if that is due to bottle variation or if this Champagne is getting ready to shut down some (or totally). Still, for now, and this bottle, a 97 point wine for me!
Read 2 Comments / Post a Comment / 6 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue