Rieslinghuis Tasting Room, Zandvoort, NL
Tasted Sunday, July 21, 2024 by Xavier Auerbach with 355 views
An extensive tasting of 16 vintages of Schäfer-Fröhlich's Bockenauer Felseneck GG (2007-2022). All wines came from the cellars of Rieslinghuis (Felix & David Warners) and were purchased directly from the estate through the years. The tasting flights were interspersed by the four courses of an excellent lunch prepared by David Warners with accompanying wines, also from Schäfer-Fröhlich. Vintages from 2015 until the present day generally performed at a very high level, there seems to have been a slightly weaker period from 2010-2014, and from the older vintages 2007 and 2009 (probably the winner overall) showed extremely well. A wonderful event, great fun and very instructive.
Lots of sponti aromas on the nose, very reductive, delightful juicy ripeness on the palate interplays with spicy minerality, extremely elegant and tightly wound but tranquil, playful elderflower finish.
Post a Comment / 7 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Crisper and cooler than the 2022, not as reductive, wonderful minerally energy, orange zest, very precise, tight and focused, spicy slate, intense and long finish, drier than the 2022.
Post a Comment / 9 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Still some reduction in the background on the nose, playful fruit, whiff of sucrosité, much livelier and refined than the bigger 2019, feels a lot younger too, riper than the 2021 but equally tight, crisp acidity, vibrant, great drive on the finish.
Post a Comment / 10 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Starting to show some evolution, hint of wax on the nose, ripe orchard fruit with a mango edge, concentrated and ripe palate, balanced and harmonious, generous and comfortable, piercing acidity, grippy bitters are finely textured, ripe but zesty citrus and mango on the intense and very long finish. Quite spectacular right now, a full organ wine.
Post a Comment / 11 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Like 2019 a very warm vintage but much less weighty and tropical, remarkably restrained and fresh, well-balanced ripeness, whiff of Pernod, very persistent finish, seems more monolithic at first but develops its complexity quickly in the glass, playful minerality on the long finish.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Not really convincing, very closed on the nose, there is a sense of herbaceous bitterness on the finish. Does not open up in the glass, even after several hours. In no way consistent with my earlier note from 2019, probably not a good bottle. Not rated.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Beautifully elegant, focused and precise, lifted and floral, citrus and orchard fruit, in a beautiful stage between youth and maturity, spicy minerality, zesty grapefruit, light on its feet, long and driven finish with a whiff of aromatic green herbs. Good future.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Mature and tranquil but underpinned by excellent acidity and spicy minerally energy, warmer style than the fresher 2016, slightly monolithic aromatically, not perfectly clean on the finish. Good wine, but lacks the excitement of the 2016.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
From a cool and wet vintage, light and dry, slightly stalky, herbaceous finish.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Lifted and floral, aromatic, seal wax and zesty citrus, whiff of botrytis, bright acidity but lacks a bit of energy and length on the finish.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
In a difficult phase or not a good bottle? Not easy to approach right now, putty on the nose, more expressive on the palate, almond stones, hint of walnut, the bitters are quite grippy. Not rated.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Warm vintage, slightly low acidity, crème pâtissière, creamy and spicy, attractive, ripe fruit is a bit warm but not overripe, fuzzy finish with some back-end heat. Ready. Different from the bottle tasted in 2022.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Much deeper colour than the 2009, not really harmonious, honey and spice, apricot, not perfectly clean, reflects its unbalanced growing season, honeyed finish. Like many 2010 GG's this was spectacular in youth, but it is now disjointed ( a fate which many share).
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
A spectacular bottle, much better than on the previous three occasions. So young and energetic, creamy lemon, flowers and spicy slate, the minerally freshness and acidity continues to hide the power and concentration even after 15 years, supremely precise and focused, everything in the right place, tightly wound, laser-like acidity, lemon zest, long and linear finish. Great future.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Juicy and fresh, surprisingly a riper style than the 2007, slightly grippy bitters, not really harmonious, honey.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Beautifully fresh and elegant, complete and precise, citrus and apple, vanilla cream, bright and youthful, flowing and elegant, floral and creamy, long and linear finish. An amazing 2007.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Showing beautifully in its maturity, develops very well in the glass, lovely tension and interplay between delicately honeyed, sweet fruit (orange, mango), and firm acidity, spicy depth, palpable minerality on the finish, not quite as detailed as the best Felseneck GG’s (but in better shape than the Felseneck 2008 today).
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Expressive nose, juicy peaches, flower honey, spicy depth, whiff of blonde caramel, wonderful freshness, intense and ripe but superbly elegant, delicately sweet, long and playful finish. At perfect peak.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
We had two different bottlings of Felseneck Halbtrocken today, AP24 and AP46. The label for this wine in the picture is consistent with AP24 (the label for AP46 is slightly different), so I will list this here, 12% ABV. Waxy and gently sweet, delicately spicy, a more refined and floral style than the deeper AP46, ripe acidity but lively, minerally core, harmonious, creamy and flowing finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
12.5% ABV. More power and depth than the #24 which accompanied it, honeyed fruit, bright acidity but a bit more muted aromatically, warm spices and apricot, finishes a bit blunt with noticeable bitters.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Energetic, youthful, light and bright, intensity but without weight, very minerally, grapefruit and blood orange, very good length. So precise.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A bottle from my private collection, completely out of scope, but fun to share with fellow Riesling enthusiasts. Level approximately 4.5 cm below the cork, which was extracted in one piece with the Durand. Extremely youthful colour for age, spiced peach, mint, delicately sweet palate, seal wax, impressive intensity and power, only slightly dry on the finish, citrus, very good persistence. Much better than the bottle in May 2024.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
An extra bottle from the Rieslinghuis' cellar. Super juicy and dancing, fresh and a bit of sucrosité, flowers and slate, apple and peach, concentrated, intensity without weight, citrus, flowing finish, excellent length. Supreme elegance.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

NV Emrich-Schönleber Weissburgunder Brut 89 Points
Germany, Nahe
Primary, lovely yellow apple fruit, uncomplicated, nice whiff of spice, pure and well made, ripe acidity, good length.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No