All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is somewhat subdued, with just a faint trace of dark fruit surfacing. On the palate, a dense core of minerality and dark fruit dominates, though complexity is lacking. It feels closed and could use more depth and sweetness for balance. The tannins are fine, and the structure is sound. The frame is well-proportioned, though it remains tight and reticent.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A moderately expressive nose reveals ripe, sweet fruit at its heart, laced with minerality and herbal accents. On the palate, it is classically structured, defined by a wall of fine tannins and refreshing acidity. Despite this, the wine feels shallow and not fully open, with herbaceous and mineral elements overshadowing the fruit. Oak use is excessive, leading to astringent tannins that detract from harmony.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose leans slightly over the hill, showing the first signs of oxidation amid lingering black fruit and mineral tones. The palate performs better, with clear ripe black fruit, herbs, and minerality, offset by only faint oxidative and solvent hints. There is a touch of harshness in the wood tannins, though the overall structure holds. Still drinkable, this appears to be a flawed bottle rather than a systemic issue.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Initially muted on the nose, but with air, bretty notes mingle with shy dark fruit, gradually unfurling into expressive blue fruit aromatics. The palate mirrors this transformation, revealing fresh blue and black fruit with herbs and minerality. Though still lacking some charm and sweetness, and the tannins remain firm, this is clearly a wine with trajectory. It started at 92 points and ended up approaching 95. Superb and promising.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is restrained, dominated by oak tones. The palate offers more promise, presenting dark fruit, minerality, and hints of toffee cloaked in opulent wood. Still somewhat closed, with fruit struggling to emerge fully. Structurally, the wood tannins weigh heavily, though the underlying components are solid. A touch more fruit prominence would elevate it
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose falters slightly with acetone piercing through a dense, murky core. The palate is more compelling, marked by power and richness, though muddled at first. With time, clarity improves as dark and blue fruits emerge alongside prominent minerality and herbs. A touch more sweetness and purity would help, but the tannin structure is polished and freshness outstanding. Began at 85 points, finishing closer to 90. Promising.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is reserved, showing hints of blue and black fruit beneath a muted veil. The palate opens more readily, with generous dark fruit, though it carries substantial oak influence and grippy tannins. Slightly alcoholic and lacking full balance, yet it boasts a strong core of substance which stands as its highlight.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The bouquet is exquisite, a harmony of toast, burnt sugar, dark fruit, and fine minerality. It sings with sexiness and seduction. The palate mirrors this with equal grace—open and pixelated, deeply layered and full of sweet seductiveness, yet lifted by pristine freshness. Toast, coffee, burnt sugar, and a kaleidoscope of fruit are perfectly delineated. Balance is ethereal. It floats like a feather, nearly Burgundian in finesse. A clear Lafite, with a touch of Mouton allure.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is marred by alcohol and acetone. The palate shows some improvement but retains nail polish character. There is underlying substance that hints at better potential, though marred by imbalance.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A heady, luxurious bouquet of coffee, burnt sugar, toast, and dark fruit. The palate is intense and sumptuous, layered with richness and a silky texture that elevates the whole. Still youthful and concentrated, it shows classic proportions with full ripeness and a seductive edge. Long life ahead. Already a 97-point wine, with upside.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is flawed, marked by acetone. The palate is surprisingly intact, offering immense substance with cascading waves of fruit, minerality, and tannin backed by vibrant freshness. Yet the bottle is compromised. Hard to judge fairly.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Aromatics of dark fruit, a hint of toast, and a seductive touch remain slightly closed. The palate is elegant and finely tuned, showcasing dark fruit and lingering toasty notes that extend gracefully into the finish. Sexy and drinkable now, not complex but thoroughly enjoyable.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is shy but refined, offering dark fruit, gentle sweetness, and whispers of forest berries. The palate is a joy, weaving red, blue, and black fruit with subtle toast and minerality. The tannins are delicate, freshness superb. Still opening, not the deepest of wines, but wonderfully graceful.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: An enchanting nose reveals toasty notes wrapped in sweet fruit. The bouquet is irresistible. On the palate, vibrant fruit in every hue bursts forward alongside herbs, minerality, floral tones, and a touch of toast. Elegantly composed with great tension and finesse. Classic in spirit, yet modern in charm.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is subdued, with whispers of brett reported. Not much expression upfront. The palate compensates impressively with an array of fruit, toast, minerality, and considerable depth. Structurally impeccable, silky and seductive.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A touch of acetone on a quiet nose. The palate feels restrained and slightly coarse, though the fruit core shows promise. Currently lacks finesse, depth, and cohesion.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is deep, slightly bretty, and carries a hint of alcohol. The palate reveals enormous substance, laced with brett, herbs, minerality, and fine dark fruit. Despite the power, it retains an airy elegance. A compelling wine, though the brett may be overbearing. Not entirely clean, but captivating.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is restrained but clean, with dark and red fruit in subtle relief. The palate is intense and layered, delivering red and dark fruit, herbs, coffee, and Cos-like spice. Texturally elegant, a weightless silkiness. Excellent now, though likely not built for long-term cellaring. Peaked at 94pts with some downside risk.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is dense, dark, and mineral-laden, though still slightly reserved. The palate is explosive with fresh blue and black fruit, herbs, earth, and tobacco. Definition is razor sharp. With time, additional layers of coffee and toast unfold. Superb complexity and expression. Branon continues to impress. Outstanding
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose feels heavy and alcoholic, not inviting. The palate shows much more, with a striking entry and mid-palate of ripe fruit. Unfortunately, acidity dominates the finish, stripping away flavor. Tannin structure is adequate, but the imbalance undermines the whole.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: An intricate nose of forest berries, coffee, brett, and tobacco. The palate shines with sweet red berries, blue fruit, herbs, and minerality. Tannins are ultra-fine, structure flawless, and freshness exceptional. Silky and complete.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is closed and brooding. The palate explodes with energy: coffee, toast, burnt sugar, herbs, minerality, and tobacco in a layered, seductive style. Silky and structured, with firm tannins still integrating. Classic Pape Clément charm, showing both wildness and allure. A wine for hedonists.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is flawed, the palate likewise marred by nail polish and imbalance. Substance is apparent but masked. A disappointing showing.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Oxidized. Notes of bouillon dominate. Undrinkable.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is moderately expressive, brimming with vivid red fruit. The palate continues this theme, offering the most intensely red-fruited profile of all. Sugary and precise, with herbal and mineral complexity. Still youthful and tannic, tightly wound but highly promising.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Puisseguin Saint-Émilion
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is overly ripe, bordering on cooked fruit, with noticeable heat. The palate continues in the same vein, filled with overly ripe fruit and alcohol warmth, ending in astringency and a wood-dominated finish. Freshness is present but fails to compensate for the imbalance. Not a good showing.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Magnum. The nose is muted and lacks definition. The palate follows suit, offering little depth and poorly delineated aromas, with faint fruit, minerality, and oak. While freshness is acceptable, the wine finishes on astringent notes. Lacks character.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose opens with dominant wood and minerality, with ripe fruit and a trace of tobacco beneath. The palate is more engaging, revealing coffee and ripe fruit, but oxidation and harsh tannins creep in, resulting in a drying, wood-laced finish. A challenging wine.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A reserved nose with light menthol. The palate offers moderately ripe fruit, touches of coffee, tobacco, menthol, and minerality. However, intrusive wood tannins make for a drying, difficult finish. Some positive traits, but hard to enjoy fully.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Muted nose with faint wood. The palate is more generous with red and blue fruit, herbs, and minerality, yet finishes harshly on wood tannins. Drinkable, but fading. With air, the fruit recedes and tannins dry further. This era of Beauséjour Duffau often suffers from premature oxidation or drying structures, in my experience.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A quiet nose with ripe fruit and Christmas spice. The palate opens nicely with red berries, dark fruit, minerality, and oak spice. Well defined, fairly fine tannins, and more freshness than previous bottles. Lacks signs of drying tannins this time, but earlier bottles have shown oxidation. A solid showing tonight.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is tired, marked by oxidation and bouillon. The palate clings to life, though brutally extracted and lacking depth or clarity. With time it gains some focus, but the drying finish persists. A wine in decline.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Dominated by oxidation and strong Maggi notes on the nose and palate. There is substance, but it is buried beneath astringency and overpowering oxidized character. Technically drinkable, but thoroughly unenjoyable.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A dense, slightly alcoholic nose with hints of fruit. The palate starts beautifully with red and blue fruit, extending gracefully through the mid-palate into a long finish. Minerality and chocolate notes add detail. Not deeply complex, but well made and devoid of harsh tannins. Alcohol shows slightly and raises doubts about long-term cellaring, but still consistent and enjoyable.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A muted, woody nose. The palate improves with red fruit, herbs, and minerality, but an excess of oak results in a drying, hard finish. Still drinkable, and improves with air as fruit emerges. Rated 88pts tonight, but with extended air, it can show more. Previous bottles have offered glimpses of greatness.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Corked. Beneath the flaw lies potential and solid structure, but the wine is undrinkable.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose lacks expression, revealing only wood and minerality, with no fruit. The palate is brutally drying, with a trace of fruit and minerality barely visible. This has not aged gracefully
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Ripe fruit on the nose with coffee, a touch of oxidation, and green wood aromas. The attack is beautiful, with seductive red and blue fruit, well-defined and layered with coffee and burnt sugar. However, the finish clips off, revealing harsh tannins and persistent green wood notes. Started at 92pts, later fell to 89pts as those green elements took over.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Slightly muted nose, not sharply defined. The palate performs better, with ripe but controlled fruit, coffee, burnt sugar, and minerality. No greenness or harshness on the finish. Well-structured, finessed, and seductive. 93 to 94pts, and the standout wine from the right bank on this evening.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Oxidized nose and palate. The pedigree is evident beneath the flaw, but premature oxidation dominates. This is part of a troubling pattern I experience: multiple vintages I tasted (1994, 2003, 2004 twice, 2008, 2014, and 2015) have suffered from similar issues (either harsh, woody tannins or various degrees of premature oxidation).
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Reduction on the nose obscures everything beneath. The palate follows suit but opens slightly with time. The structure is good with fine tannins and freshness. While currently disappointing, there are no signs of harsh wood or oxidation, suggesting this may evolve positively. 90pts today with upside potential.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Nail polish and oxidation on the nose. The palate is equally compromised, with green, hard, woody tannins and masking solvent notes. Barely drinkable and very weak.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose shows oxidation and meaty notes. The palate is better, offering ripe fruit, seductive oak, and minerality, with only mild dryness. The fruit briefly conceals the flaws, but with time, nail polish and oxidative notes resurface. Still drinkable, but nearing the end. Drink up.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Bouillon and oxidation dominate both nose and palate. Substance lies beneath, but the wine is irreversibly oxidized.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is rich in ripe, dark fruit with alcohol showing. The attack on the palate is better, with blue and red berries, but the finish is harsh and drying. A wine that falls apart too soon.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is alcoholic and subdued. The palate is more expressive with sweet fruit, some coffee, and seductive texture. No green or harsh tannins. Simple, but quite good. Consistent with earlier bottles and likely among the best Troplongs before the recent stylistic change. 92 to 93pts.
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Lacks aromatic clarity and definition. The palate is extremely drying, confirming earlier impressions from a prior bottle. Not good.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Explosive nose of spices and saffron, lifted by brilliant freshness. The palate is a tour de force of apricot, quince, pear, saffron, and sea salt. Complex, perfectly defined, and in superb balance. Easily the wine of the second night, outperforming all right bank reds and even surpassing Yquem in openness and charm. 96 to 97pts.
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is slightly closed. The palate opens beautifully with caramel, sugar, pear, and saffron. Sweet and lush, though perhaps a touch too rich and lacking the piercing freshness of the Nairac. However, its immense substance suggests it may surpass Nairac in a few decades. 94pts.
2005 Château Branaire-Ducru 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Julien
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is somewhat subdued, with just a faint trace of dark fruit surfacing. On the palate, a dense core of minerality and dark fruit dominates, though complexity is lacking. It feels closed and could use more depth and sweetness for balance. The tannins are fine, and the structure is sound. The frame is well-proportioned, though it remains tight and reticent.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Lagrange (St. Julien) 91 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Julien
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A moderately expressive nose reveals ripe, sweet fruit at its heart, laced with minerality and herbal accents. On the palate, it is classically structured, defined by a wall of fine tannins and refreshing acidity. Despite this, the wine feels shallow and not fully open, with herbaceous and mineral elements overshadowing the fruit. Oak use is excessive, leading to astringent tannins that detract from harmony.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Léoville Barton 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Julien
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose leans slightly over the hill, showing the first signs of oxidation amid lingering black fruit and mineral tones. The palate performs better, with clear ripe black fruit, herbs, and minerality, offset by only faint oxidative and solvent hints. There is a touch of harshness in the wood tannins, though the overall structure holds. Still drinkable, this appears to be a flawed bottle rather than a systemic issue.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Léoville Las Cases 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Julien
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Initially muted on the nose, but with air, bretty notes mingle with shy dark fruit, gradually unfurling into expressive blue fruit aromatics. The palate mirrors this transformation, revealing fresh blue and black fruit with herbs and minerality. Though still lacking some charm and sweetness, and the tannins remain firm, this is clearly a wine with trajectory. It started at 92 points and ended up approaching 95. Superb and promising.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Calon-Ségur 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Estèphe
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is restrained, dominated by oak tones. The palate offers more promise, presenting dark fruit, minerality, and hints of toffee cloaked in opulent wood. Still somewhat closed, with fruit struggling to emerge fully. Structurally, the wood tannins weigh heavily, though the underlying components are solid. A touch more fruit prominence would elevate it
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Clos Manou 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose falters slightly with acetone piercing through a dense, murky core. The palate is more compelling, marked by power and richness, though muddled at first. With time, clarity improves as dark and blue fruits emerge alongside prominent minerality and herbs. A touch more sweetness and purity would help, but the tannin structure is polished and freshness outstanding. Began at 85 points, finishing closer to 90. Promising.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Corked.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Lynch-Bages 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is reserved, showing hints of blue and black fruit beneath a muted veil. The palate opens more readily, with generous dark fruit, though it carries substantial oak influence and grippy tannins. Slightly alcoholic and lacking full balance, yet it boasts a strong core of substance which stands as its highlight.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Lafite Rothschild 98 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The bouquet is exquisite, a harmony of toast, burnt sugar, dark fruit, and fine minerality. It sings with sexiness and seduction. The palate mirrors this with equal grace—open and pixelated, deeply layered and full of sweet seductiveness, yet lifted by pristine freshness. Toast, coffee, burnt sugar, and a kaleidoscope of fruit are perfectly delineated. Balance is ethereal. It floats like a feather, nearly Burgundian in finesse. A clear Lafite, with a touch of Mouton allure.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Pontet-Canet 88 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is marred by alcohol and acetone. The palate shows some improvement but retains nail polish character. There is underlying substance that hints at better potential, though marred by imbalance.
Read 5 Comments / Post a Comment / 5 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Mouton Rothschild 97 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A heady, luxurious bouquet of coffee, burnt sugar, toast, and dark fruit. The palate is intense and sumptuous, layered with richness and a silky texture that elevates the whole. Still youthful and concentrated, it shows classic proportions with full ripeness and a seductive edge. Long life ahead. Already a 97-point wine, with upside.
Read 3 Comments / Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Latour Grand Vin Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is flawed, marked by acetone. The palate is surprisingly intact, offering immense substance with cascading waves of fruit, minerality, and tannin backed by vibrant freshness. Yet the bottle is compromised. Hard to judge fairly.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château d'Issan 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Aromatics of dark fruit, a hint of toast, and a seductive touch remain slightly closed. The palate is elegant and finely tuned, showcasing dark fruit and lingering toasty notes that extend gracefully into the finish. Sexy and drinkable now, not complex but thoroughly enjoyable.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Brane-Cantenac 93 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is shy but refined, offering dark fruit, gentle sweetness, and whispers of forest berries. The palate is a joy, weaving red, blue, and black fruit with subtle toast and minerality. The tannins are delicate, freshness superb. Still opening, not the deepest of wines, but wonderfully graceful.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Margaux 96 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: An enchanting nose reveals toasty notes wrapped in sweet fruit. The bouquet is irresistible. On the palate, vibrant fruit in every hue bursts forward alongside herbs, minerality, floral tones, and a touch of toast. Elegantly composed with great tension and finesse. Classic in spirit, yet modern in charm.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Palmer 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is subdued, with whispers of brett reported. Not much expression upfront. The palate compensates impressively with an array of fruit, toast, minerality, and considerable depth. Structurally impeccable, silky and seductive.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Rauzan-Ségla 88 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A touch of acetone on a quiet nose. The palate feels restrained and slightly coarse, though the fruit core shows promise. Currently lacks finesse, depth, and cohesion.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Luchey-Halde 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is deep, slightly bretty, and carries a hint of alcohol. The palate reveals enormous substance, laced with brett, herbs, minerality, and fine dark fruit. Despite the power, it retains an airy elegance. A compelling wine, though the brett may be overbearing. Not entirely clean, but captivating.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Malartic-Lagravière 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is restrained but clean, with dark and red fruit in subtle relief. The palate is intense and layered, delivering red and dark fruit, herbs, coffee, and Cos-like spice. Texturally elegant, a weightless silkiness. Excellent now, though likely not built for long-term cellaring. Peaked at 94pts with some downside risk.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Branon 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is dense, dark, and mineral-laden, though still slightly reserved. The palate is explosive with fresh blue and black fruit, herbs, earth, and tobacco. Definition is razor sharp. With time, additional layers of coffee and toast unfold. Superb complexity and expression. Branon continues to impress. Outstanding
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Haut-Bailly 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose feels heavy and alcoholic, not inviting. The palate shows much more, with a striking entry and mid-palate of ripe fruit. Unfortunately, acidity dominates the finish, stripping away flavor. Tannin structure is adequate, but the imbalance undermines the whole.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Smith Haut Lafitte 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: An intricate nose of forest berries, coffee, brett, and tobacco. The palate shines with sweet red berries, blue fruit, herbs, and minerality. Tannins are ultra-fine, structure flawless, and freshness exceptional. Silky and complete.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Pape Clément 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is closed and brooding. The palate explodes with energy: coffee, toast, burnt sugar, herbs, minerality, and tobacco in a layered, seductive style. Silky and structured, with firm tannins still integrating. Classic Pape Clément charm, showing both wildness and allure. A wine for hedonists.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Les Carmes Haut-Brion 84 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is flawed, the palate likewise marred by nail polish and imbalance. Substance is apparent but masked. A disappointing showing.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château La Mission Haut-Brion Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Oxidized. Notes of bouillon dominate. Undrinkable.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Haut-Brion 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is moderately expressive, brimming with vivid red fruit. The palate continues this theme, offering the most intensely red-fruited profile of all. Sugary and precise, with herbal and mineral complexity. Still youthful and tannic, tightly wound but highly promising.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 La Mauriane 83 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Puisseguin Saint-Émilion
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is overly ripe, bordering on cooked fruit, with noticeable heat. The palate continues in the same vein, filled with overly ripe fruit and alcohol warmth, ending in astringency and a wood-dominated finish. Freshness is present but fails to compensate for the imbalance. Not a good showing.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Dubois-Grimon 84 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Magnum. The nose is muted and lacks definition. The palate follows suit, offering little depth and poorly delineated aromas, with faint fruit, minerality, and oak. While freshness is acceptable, the wine finishes on astringent notes. Lacks character.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Bellevue Mondotte 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose opens with dominant wood and minerality, with ripe fruit and a trace of tobacco beneath. The palate is more engaging, revealing coffee and ripe fruit, but oxidation and harsh tannins creep in, resulting in a drying, wood-laced finish. A challenging wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Pavie Decesse 86 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A reserved nose with light menthol. The palate offers moderately ripe fruit, touches of coffee, tobacco, menthol, and minerality. However, intrusive wood tannins make for a drying, difficult finish. Some positive traits, but hard to enjoy fully.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Beausejour (Duffau Lagarrosse) 82 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Muted nose with faint wood. The palate is more generous with red and blue fruit, herbs, and minerality, yet finishes harshly on wood tannins. Drinkable, but fading. With air, the fruit recedes and tannins dry further. This era of Beauséjour Duffau often suffers from premature oxidation or drying structures, in my experience.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Canon 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A quiet nose with ripe fruit and Christmas spice. The palate opens nicely with red berries, dark fruit, minerality, and oak spice. Well defined, fairly fine tannins, and more freshness than previous bottles. Lacks signs of drying tannins this time, but earlier bottles have shown oxidation. A solid showing tonight.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Figeac 84 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is tired, marked by oxidation and bouillon. The palate clings to life, though brutally extracted and lacking depth or clarity. With time it gains some focus, but the drying finish persists. A wine in decline.
Post a Comment / 5 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Clos Fourtet Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Dominated by oxidation and strong Maggi notes on the nose and palate. There is substance, but it is buried beneath astringency and overpowering oxidized character. Technically drinkable, but thoroughly unenjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Angélus 93 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A dense, slightly alcoholic nose with hints of fruit. The palate starts beautifully with red and blue fruit, extending gracefully through the mid-palate into a long finish. Minerality and chocolate notes add detail. Not deeply complex, but well made and devoid of harsh tannins. Alcohol shows slightly and raises doubts about long-term cellaring, but still consistent and enjoyable.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 5 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Ausone 88 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: A muted, woody nose. The palate improves with red fruit, herbs, and minerality, but an excess of oak results in a drying, hard finish. Still drinkable, and improves with air as fruit emerges. Rated 88pts tonight, but with extended air, it can show more. Previous bottles have offered glimpses of greatness.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château L'Evangile Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Corked. Beneath the flaw lies potential and solid structure, but the wine is undrinkable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Clos l'Église (Pomerol) 82 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose lacks expression, revealing only wood and minerality, with no fruit. The palate is brutally drying, with a trace of fruit and minerality barely visible. This has not aged gracefully
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Trotanoy 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Ripe fruit on the nose with coffee, a touch of oxidation, and green wood aromas. The attack is beautiful, with seductive red and blue fruit, well-defined and layered with coffee and burnt sugar. However, the finish clips off, revealing harsh tannins and persistent green wood notes. Started at 92pts, later fell to 89pts as those green elements took over.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château L'Eglise-Clinet 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Slightly muted nose, not sharply defined. The palate performs better, with ripe but controlled fruit, coffee, burnt sugar, and minerality. No greenness or harshness on the finish. Well-structured, finessed, and seductive. 93 to 94pts, and the standout wine from the right bank on this evening.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Pétrus Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Oxidized nose and palate. The pedigree is evident beneath the flaw, but premature oxidation dominates. This is part of a troubling pattern I experience: multiple vintages I tasted (1994, 2003, 2004 twice, 2008, 2014, and 2015) have suffered from similar issues (either harsh, woody tannins or various degrees of premature oxidation).
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Lafleur 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Reduction on the nose obscures everything beneath. The palate follows suit but opens slightly with time. The structure is good with fine tannins and freshness. While currently disappointing, there are no signs of harsh wood or oxidation, suggesting this may evolve positively. 90pts today with upside potential.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Pavie 80 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Nail polish and oxidation on the nose. The palate is equally compromised, with green, hard, woody tannins and masking solvent notes. Barely drinkable and very weak.
Read 2 Comments / Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Péby Faugères 84 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose shows oxidation and meaty notes. The palate is better, offering ripe fruit, seductive oak, and minerality, with only mild dryness. The fruit briefly conceals the flaws, but with time, nail polish and oxidative notes resurface. Still drinkable, but nearing the end. Drink up.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Pavie Macquin Flawed
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Bouillon and oxidation dominate both nose and palate. Substance lies beneath, but the wine is irreversibly oxidized.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 La Mondotte 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is rich in ripe, dark fruit with alcohol showing. The attack on the palate is better, with blue and red berries, but the finish is harsh and drying. A wine that falls apart too soon.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Troplong Mondot 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is alcoholic and subdued. The palate is more expressive with sweet fruit, some coffee, and seductive texture. No green or harsh tannins. Simple, but quite good. Consistent with earlier bottles and likely among the best Troplongs before the recent stylistic change. 92 to 93pts.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Valandraud 82 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Lacks aromatic clarity and definition. The palate is extremely drying, confirming earlier impressions from a prior bottle. Not good.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château Nairac 96 Points
France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Barsac
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: Explosive nose of spices and saffron, lifted by brilliant freshness. The palate is a tour de force of apricot, quince, pear, saffron, and sea salt. Complex, perfectly defined, and in superb balance. Easily the wine of the second night, outperforming all right bank reds and even surpassing Yquem in openness and charm. 96 to 97pts.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2005 Château d'Yquem 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Sauternes
All wines tasted blind, not decanted. Left bank is quite good, right bank is a disaster waiting to happen. A few observations: 1) Left bank 2005s are good to very good, with ripe yet fresh fruit, real substance, and the classic structure that defines the vintage. 2) Most are just entering their first drinking window but remain youthful, with no tertiary development yet. 3) Top wines were Lafite (98), Mouton (97), Margaux (96), and Branon (95). Sadly, Latour and Mission were faulty. 4) Of 22 right banks, only 5 scored 90 or above. Eglise Clinet led with 94pts. The Parker-era style (too ripe, too extracted, heavily oaked) combined with Merlot’s fragility, does not age well. As the opulent fruit fades, what remains are harsh wood tannins and wines prone to premature oxidation. Many tasters today still enjoy these wines because decanting brings out the opulent fruit that masks structural flaws. But our approach offered a glimpse into their future: once that fruit fades with age, as it inevitably will, there will be nothing left to hide the dry tannins and unbalanced frames. Fortunately, that style has falling out of favor in the past decade.
TN: The nose is slightly closed. The palate opens beautifully with caramel, sugar, pear, and saffron. Sweet and lush, though perhaps a touch too rich and lacking the piercing freshness of the Nairac. However, its immense substance suggests it may surpass Nairac in a few decades. 94pts.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No