Tasted Saturday, September 27, 2025 by bsumoba with 123 views
Blind. Juicy Napa fruit bomb that was once a style I liked but now feels manipulated, over extracted and meant to sell wine than to display the terroir or the winemaking style
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. #3 in the blind. A little astringent at first but some swirling, opened it up. Unfortunately, this got lost in the blind.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. My #4 in the blind. A bit like Napa juice but not going completely into the fruit bomb world.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Blind. WOTN in the blind. The most approachable now and would be IMO, a crowd favorite. Will it hold up over the years? I would say no…but I think many of the 22s might be that way as well.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Blind. Took #2 in the blind. Well balanced but clearly has some stuffing to go long. This is great juice, but like many wines in my cellar, needs time.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
nonblind. Maybe the most complex of the group but was pulled after the blind. May have received top honors if it did. Nose was super interesting in a good way. Great juice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
As I was pouring this wine into my glass, I was a bit hesitant because the experiences I have had so far with Chave have left me with tons of funk (brett?) that I am quite sensitive to. I was almost beginning to think this is Chave’s style. I go back to thinking about the “Somm” series where some very well known winemakers often called Chave their “IT” wine. I just couldn’t quite understand. This bottle has given me some hope again. This was beautiful! Tons of complexity, hints of fruit, earth, maybe just a tinge of funk that I was perfectly fine with. Loved it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
First La La. It is true, these Guigals just need lots of age on them. I was concerned that I was going to get a ton of terroir and bacon fat but there was tons of fruit, probably due to its youth. One more bottle in hand and I’ll take other’s advice and wait another 10-15 years to try again.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Super interesting nose. Very interesting, complex and fun to drink. This is what I feel like a bottle like this should taste like as it develops over time.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Got a bit lost amongst the group. Next to the Turque and Chave, it almost felt like I was drinking nothing. Just felt muted. Round 2 a few hours later, some fruit showed up and not all was lost on this bottle.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
My review was a different of this wine. On my palate I got a bit of bitterness and felt like overall it was just a bit over the hill for me. That being said, it felt like a well kept bottle that provided some interesting notes of butterscotch and dried tea leaves.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
This bottle is one of those wines that in the right crowd with the right outside temperature, would just be a great refreshment. On its own though, it came off as a bit overdone.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Against the 20 Fathem, I liked this much more but still followed a similar path for me in terms of interest. On its own, it also felt a bit overdone and it felt like it was trying to appeal to a side of me that if I had this I would chill the hell out of it, I would be bringing to a pool party on a hot day and I would just enjoy.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
no new notes other than this is a great vintage and not just because i have a case of it or that it is my 2nd born birthyear wine.
I think this is destined to be a great one.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.


2012 Dom Pérignon Champagne 95 Points
France, Champagne
Cristal v Dom Perignon Flight! – Okay this wine is getting better. As mentioned, I kept poo poo’ing this wine but it is starting to grow on me. 2 more bottles in the cellar. I will try as hard as I can to wait for 2030.
Post a Comment / 5 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2012 Louis Roederer Champagne Cristal Brut 96 Points
France, Champagne
Cristal v Dom Perignon Flight! Another good showing from Cristal. Not my favorite vintage. Cristal though, is a style that I very much like and understand why this house is just good year in, year out.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2013 Dom Pérignon Champagne 96 Points
France, Champagne
Cristal v Dom Perignon Flight! – 2nd time with 13 and this was showing much better after a couple years. Not surprising though because it feels like I really like Dom with age on them and as each year that passes, it gets better for my palate. I can’t wait to drink the 08 and 98 in my cellar.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2013 Louis Roederer Champagne Cristal Brut 98 Points
France, Champagne
Cristal v Dom Perignon Flight! Well what can I say, 13 Cristal for the win! This was not surprising and just bested all the other bubbles on the table. If one were to keep some Cristal in the cellar, it would be the 13 and the 08.
Probably WOTN in general for this day
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No