YH Beijing, SF
Tasted Sunday, November 9, 2025 by ohne_musik with 108 views
A terrific bottle. Nose is in the perfect place, with peony/black flowers. Palate is crancherry acidity, with some evolved notes of old books and cassis, but the overall impression is one of sappy freshness, and a wine that is still climbing towards its peak. Really lovely St Estephe stoniness and gently grippy tannins on the finish. Noses ahead of the '00 for WOTD, but just by the smallest of margins.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
A terrific wine that on all accounts is a powerhouse, but just a step behind the 89 in terms of balance and excitement. Part of this is the vintage, as I prefer 89 to 90 stylistically at most estates. This is more open, richer and more evolved than the 89, with bigger fruit and structure. Cassis, tobacco, and black tea make it feel a bit more evolved than the 89. Super clean bottle though - nary a trace of brett!
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Disappointing relative to expectations. Nothing overtly wrong, maybe has not seen the best storage (private cellar purchase from K&L), but slightly muddled nose of red fruit and flowers. Palate is rich, black plummy fruit drying out a bit. Simply outclassed by the other wines on the table.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Excellent showing, making up for the '90. This felt far younger (10+ years), with driving acidity, red fruit, with hints of asian spice and dried flowers lingering long after the swallow. Still some 86 tannins on this, but the aromatics and vigorous fruit put everything in balance. Very classy wine.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Classic 95 wine, and I appreciate it for what it is. A touch austere and reserved, without the generosity of fruit and amplitude of the bigger years. That said, there's some really lovely delicate floral notes to accompany the restrained cherry fruit, accompanied by plenty of crushed rock. A bit tight and tannic but opens up over the course of lunch. I think a better wine on its own than in a flight of heavy-hitting years.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Classic old school St Estephe at peak! Lovely purple fruits (cassis, mulberry), pipe tobacco and worn leather. Midweight density, and doesn't quite hit the highs of the '00, but zero complaints about this wine - it's flat out delicious.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Focused and abundant bouquet of cherries, violets, a bit of vanilla, and just a touch of heat on the nose. The complete package in the mouth - vibrant acidity, a panoply fruits ranging from redcurrant to cherry, orange peel, blond tobacco, chalk and crushed rock. Super fine tannins that have more in common with modern-era (2016+) Montrose than the Montrose of yore. This is super classy and refined, like the young Audrey Hepburn.
The overall impression is strikingly similar to the 89, just a decade younger, with finer tannins and ever so slightly larger scaled. While this is more ready than the other 2000s we've tried recently (PLL, PB, LMHB, etc), it still is just hitting its stride and may eclipse the 89 with another decade or two.
Read 3 Comments / Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Pleasantly surprised by how well this showed - a much more complete wine than the bottle I had a few years back. Red fruit, flowers and wet stone on the nose. Intensely stony on the palate, with pretty (borderline seductive) red fruit, good density, and is punching in a different weight class than the 96.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
This wine shows a strong kinship to the 2000, but comes across as more extracted and tannic - to the extent that there's maybe a bit of unwanted astringency. It could be that this hasn't fully emerged from adolescence (which is surprising given how accessible other '01s have been), but it doesn't feel as balanced as its older siblings. Still, it's good juice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2020 Château Lafleur Les Champs Libres 93 Points
France, Bordeaux
Lovely focused nose that feels more like chablis or one of the new school Vouvray producers like Guiberteau or Bernaudeau. Linear, compact, coiled, and bristling with tension. A bit of struck match reduction, followed by white flowers and bright lemon fruit draped around a vibrant core of savory minerals. Elevated acidity married to textural richness and substantial heft. Drinks well now (especially after a few hours of air) but one suspects it will gain complexity with a decades or two sideways. 93+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
1989 Château Meyney 93 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Estèphe
Love this! A great way to start the lunch, whetting the palate for the bigger wines to come. This is old school cru bourgeois at its best -- clean on the nose, a very complete wine, with beautiful red fruits, juicy acidity, and a bit more structure than the 88. Very clean, not a whiff of brett.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
1988 Château Meyney 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Saint-Estèphe
Classic old claret. Showing a beautifully tertiary nose, with smoky mineral, pressed flowers, old library books, a touch of leather. Palate feels just a bit tired, with the mixed red and black fruit fading a touch; ultimately it lacks the balance and density that take the 89 to the next level. 88 palate, 93 nose.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No