Chicago, IL
Tasted Saturday, November 22, 2025 by Nanda with 112 views
Tenth annual White Truffle and Nebbiolo dinner
Slow-ox for 8+ hours. This had an herbal green note as soon as it was opened that never dissipated. Good enough cherry fruit remains but it's burdened with intense green meanies. Palate is light weight and fully resolved.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Best in the 39, 43, 47 and 61 flight. Aromas have some port-like evolution but the palate is more clean with plenty of fruit remaining with good tar and dried florals. Fully resolved.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Crystalline red cherry fruit that is unfortunately laced with poop notes. It was drinkable to me, but half the table gagged with revulsion and trauma. Bring your diaper along for the ride!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Sadly an oxidized bottle.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Slow-ox for several hours and then double decanted off the sediment a couple hours before service. A gorgeous and classically Giacosa lifted aromatic of sweet red cherry and florals. While the palate is more mid-weight than the 88 Santo Stefano red label side by side, there is nothing is out of place. Picture perfect balance and persistence.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Double decanted and then slow-ox ~8 hours before service. Perhaps not as intensely aromatic as the 88 Gallina side by side, the palate here was so rich, round and robust while maintaining classic Giacossa poise. Fully mature though this can hold for a couple decades.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Corked.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Wow, one of the best white label's I've come across. While there is ripeness and sweetness to the fruit, it's so impeccably precise and fresh across the palate. Plenty of floral and asphalt nuances. Refined, silky tannins.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
More powerful and heavy-set (relatively speaking anyway) than the 1990 in the same flight. This sat in the decanter for 6-7 hours in the hopes it would become more expressive, which it did, but was still just a bigger wine than the 90 and the 88. Upside from here, and maybe it will resemble the 88 or 90 in a decade or so.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Remarkably fruit-forward (and even purple-hued) for a 60+ year old wine. Structure is now reasonably resolved and you're left with a fully mature Barolo showing solid but not significant evolution given how much fruit is remaining. Impressive in some ways, but just a little simple in other ways (if I'm being overly critical).
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
One of the wines of the night. Just the ideal amount of evolution with dried florals, dried herbs and tar notes while the fruit is still round and pleasurable. Plenty of stuffing left. At peak.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Marred by sharpie notes and a vintage/bottling that is super mixed given the VA.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Gorgeous potential here with fruit that is rich and concentrated buy shows a refined and elegant touch. Still fairly primary like so many 2004s. No harm drinking this now, but the best is a decade+ from now.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
Very hard to pick between this and the 1990 served side-by-side. Plump and still-fresh fruit has nice fresh floral and spice accents. Structure still has some grit but the fruit does its job to absorb and create balance. Slox-ox a couple hours before service and this kept getting better and better.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A tick better than the 1989 served side-by-side as I found one more gear of intensity and refinement on the 90. Plump fruit with plenty of evolution but still fresh with integrated but still gritty tannin. Slox-ox a couple hours before service and kept getting better and better.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Another disappointing bottle. Decanted for several hours but never opened up.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A baby, particularly compared to the 89 and 90 in the flight. This will be as good (maybe better) than the 89 and 90 some day, but that day isn't today. Still fairly brooding despite have excellent purity of fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Annoyingly this had just a trace of TCA. Fruit was otherwise so pure and silky. What could have been.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A monument of a wine and likely on my Barolo Mt. Rushmore when it eventually hits peak drinking. Even with a day's long decant, this wine isn't ready. It is however still delicious with waves of red cherry fruit that is marked with floral character. Structure is significant but not harsh. Fun enough now, but I suspect this will flirt with perfection in 15-20 years.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
~6 hour decant. A great 1996 that is just approaching it's peak drinking window. Lovely crystalline red cherry fruit. Upside as this gains a little more nuance.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
A quick double decant in the morning and the aromas were explosive from the get go. Classic Burlotto Monvigliero with intense whole cluster but so well integrated into the fruit with this much age. Palate is seamless and so very refined and long. Wow.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Relative to the 96 and 01 tasted tonight, this is still a bit boisterous and cagey. Don't get me wrong, it's delicious and has the trademark whole cluster of the house, I just think a few more years will bring it all together even better.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Color was dark/murky and the nose was a bit subdued. Probably not a perfect cork and therefore a bit oxidized.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
A baby but totally delicious with all the whole cluster uniqueness and plenty of packed cherry fruit. Nearly half the bottle was left on night two and it was so much better in terms of the elements being integrated. Tons of upside from here.
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
A fantastic vintage. Trademark whole cluster spice and olive notes with this cuvee but the fruit is so radiant and so purely cherry that the whole cluster is framed just right. A vintage that is youthful but delightfully seamless and a pleasure to drink.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
My favorite of the Roagna VV flight. This is a pleasure to drink and shows a great combination of old vines concentration with silky fruit, yet its still just getting started. Was terrific on night two. Loads of upside from here.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
More fleshy than the 08 side-by-side but also more youthful and brooding. This will be an terrific wine in a decade+.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Like the other three Roagna VVs, this drinks really well young with plenty of concentration and good silky fruit. While it drinks well now, it will be even better in a decade+. Same for the 12 Asili side by side.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Like the other three Roagna VVs, this drinks really well young with plenty of concentration and good silky fruit. While it drinks well now, it will be even better in a decade+. Same for the 11 Asili side by side.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2012 Vilmart & Cie Champagne Premier Cru Coeur de Cuvée 93 Points
France, Champagne, Champagne Premier Cru
Bright, radiant orchard fruit with judicious toast and brioche. Vibrant and energetic bead. Early peak drinking.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2004 Salon Champagne Blanc de Blancs Brut 96 Points
France, Champagne
Opened for about an hour before serving. A rich, decadent and powerful Champagne that is so very young. Having said that, plenty delicious with great energy and a lively palate. Upside from here.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2008 Dom Pérignon Champagne 94 Points
France, Champagne
I was able to have a glass of this on day two and it was still going so strong and the toasty reduction had integrated a bit more. A terrific vintage for Dom but one that will reward patience.
Post a Comment / 6 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2006 Krug Champagne Vintage Brut 93 Points
France, Champagne
This is more crisp and linear right now and I wonder if it's a stage or whether this will always be a more precise and less dense/broad vintage for Krug. A great bottle but other vintages have delivered more.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No