Tasted Tuesday, March 31, 2026 by RAD with 28 views
This evening I was in the mood for some Chardonnay, and I’ve got numerous bottles that I’ve yet to try. So I selected five (because Coravin), and I wanted to do more (because anything worth doing is worth overdoing)—but discretion being the better part of valor…
Two of these wines were Old World, and the other three New. One of them was a “ringer”—an inexpensive QPR wine snuck into the mix. I let the wine air in their respective glasses for 15-20 minutes before dinner; jotted a couple of quick notes on each; enjoyed them with dinner; and then completed more detailed reviews a couple hours after opening.
The most interesting takeaway this evening was watching how much wines can evolve over the course of an evening. We all know this and have experienced it; but tonight it was particularly acute. I’ve always advocated context—tasting a wine by itself (even with food) lacks important context—but tasting multiple wines together, AND letting them evolve, is enlightening.
The “ringer”—the Domaine Lafage Novellum—held its own. Each of the wines paired well with homemade Chicken Piccata. The “base” Rhys Santa Cruz Mountains continues to impress, in both Chardonnay and Pinot Noir. My experience with the Anderson Valley bottling with both grapes hasn’t gone quite as well, though this one, like the others, did improve with air.
#1: 2023 Rhys Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains
#2: 2022 Hartford / Hartford Court Chardonnay Seascape Vineyard
#3: 2023 Rhys Chardonnay Anderson Valley
#4: 2022 Faiveley Chardonnay Bourgogne Blanc
#5: 2023 Domaine Lafage Chardonnay Novellum
2022 Faiveley Chardonnay Bourgogne 89 Points
France, Burgundy, Bourgogne
Stabbed with the Coravin. Reluctant nose with floral, saline, chalk, and very light citrus notes. Light on its feet, with oyster shell—how these shells made their way to Burgundy is another topic—along with a gentle viscosity and a touch of lemon, with a chalky, minerally finish.
The most Old-World of the bunch (there was only one other one). A contemplative wine, because Faiveley. What’s going on here? Tasted blind, I might have been less charitable. Not that there’s anything bad: it’s just “meh” to the nth power (you pick the n). Despite the less-than-stellar descriptors, one can coax some complexity. Objectively, however, not a good value (I paid just under $29, and wine-searcher shows $35); you’re paying up for the Faiveley name.
Nothing off-putting, and no hard edges; but restraint plays best at the top of the lineup rather than the bottom. #4 of 5 in tonight’s tasting.
Paired well with homemade chicken piccata.
13% ABV.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No