All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Expressive nose with ripe yet cool dark fruit, graphite minerality and a touch of green bell pepper. On the palate, superb coffee and nutty notes intertwine with luxurious dark fruit and a formidable wall of fine tannins. Excellent freshness and good length. Perhaps not the most complex Latour, but immensely drinkable. The highlight was the interplay between the nutty tones and the tannic backbone. Very Latour. Very classic. 96+pts.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive bouquet with dark fruit, minerality and subtle green bell pepper. Complex yet still somewhat reserved. On the palate, intense minerality leads, followed by fresh dark fruit and classical Pauillac structure. With air, nutty nuances and additional green notes emerge. Fresh, round and balanced, though clearly still evolving. Needs more time to fully reveal its depth. 94 to 95pts today.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Modest nose with hints of ripe fruit and green notes. The palate feels thin and overly reliant on oak, with harsh wood tannins dominating the limited fruit beneath. Some sweetness emerges with air, but the structure remains oak driven. Not a success.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive nose with dark fruit, graphite minerality and a surprising freshness, even floral hints lifting the bouquet. Beautiful delineation and impressive complexity. The palate shows dark and dark red berries with touches of coffee and toffee adding seductive warmth. Nutty notes appear with air. Not as deep as the nose suggests, yet the substance is clearly present. Fine structure, good freshness and no excess. A remarkably composed 2003 that feels more classic than expected. 96+pts.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Dark fruit, green bell pepper and pronounced minerality define the nose. The palate is firm, green and mineral driven, lacking the sweet fruit needed for greater harmony. Tannic and imposing, yet admirably fresh. Not a vintage to chase, though the liquid stone minerality is compelling. Around 90pts.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Highly expressive and intense, with a nose that feels almost 2009-like in its liqueur fruit and oak presence. Menthol freshness provides lift. The palate is rich and sweet, nearly excessive, though supported by freshness that keeps it from heaviness. Oak remains prominent. Hedonistic and powerful, yet slightly too ripe and hot for my taste. The substance is undeniable and time may bring greater harmony, but on this night it felt riper than the 2003.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Dense, dark nose marked by fruit, tannin and notable oak. The palate is cleaner and more open but lacks substance and charm. Wood tannins remain slightly harsh. 89 to 90pts.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive bouquet with dark fruit, green bell pepper and classic Pauillac minerality. Inviting and charming. The palate delivers ripe fruit balanced by minerality and green notes, evolving subtly in the glass. Ripeness and oak are better managed than in 2005. Slightly warm but enjoyable. On this night I preferred the 2010’s purity, even though it scored marginally lower due to its youth.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Still not fully open. Intriguing nose with darker fruit and strong minerality. The palate remains monolithic and youthful, with noticeable oak and significant ripeness. Tannins are of superb quality and balance is present, though freshness is good rather than exceptional. Difficult to judge today, but the substance is obvious and the long term potential considerable.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: A positive surprise. Slightly muted nose with fine dark fruit and Pauillac minerality. The palate is open and expressive, showing fresh dark fruit, herbs, earthy notes and integrated oak. Precise, clean and classic with a fine structural frame and excellent freshness. A sharp, elegant and highly satisfying Latour.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Fully open and beautifully layered bouquet with herbal notes, green bell pepper and pronounced minerality framed by ripe fruit. On the palate, coffee and classic nutty Latour tones add complexity. Superb delineation, perfect tannin quality and finely judged acidity. One of the stars of the evening alongside 1996 and 2003. Slightly pronounced fruit sweetness today, which should integrate further with age.
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Open nose with a broad fruit spectrum, yet somewhat monolithic. The palate is similarly fruit driven, ranging from fresh red berries to ripe dark tones, but lacking the mineral precision and complexity expected from Latour. Feels simple and somewhat ripe at this stage. The vintage is too strong to dismiss, and Latour always requires patience, but today this was not among the highlights. 92 to 93pts.
1996 Château Latour Grand Vin 96 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Expressive nose with ripe yet cool dark fruit, graphite minerality and a touch of green bell pepper. On the palate, superb coffee and nutty notes intertwine with luxurious dark fruit and a formidable wall of fine tannins. Excellent freshness and good length. Perhaps not the most complex Latour, but immensely drinkable. The highlight was the interplay between the nutty tones and the tannic backbone. Very Latour. Very classic. 96+pts.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2000 Château Latour Grand Vin 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive bouquet with dark fruit, minerality and subtle green bell pepper. Complex yet still somewhat reserved. On the palate, intense minerality leads, followed by fresh dark fruit and classical Pauillac structure. With air, nutty nuances and additional green notes emerge. Fresh, round and balanced, though clearly still evolving. Needs more time to fully reveal its depth. 94 to 95pts today.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2002 Château Latour Grand Vin 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Modest nose with hints of ripe fruit and green notes. The palate feels thin and overly reliant on oak, with harsh wood tannins dominating the limited fruit beneath. Some sweetness emerges with air, but the structure remains oak driven. Not a success.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2003 Château Latour Grand Vin 96 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive nose with dark fruit, graphite minerality and a surprising freshness, even floral hints lifting the bouquet. Beautiful delineation and impressive complexity. The palate shows dark and dark red berries with touches of coffee and toffee adding seductive warmth. Nutty notes appear with air. Not as deep as the nose suggests, yet the substance is clearly present. Fine structure, good freshness and no excess. A remarkably composed 2003 that feels more classic than expected. 96+pts.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Château Latour Grand Vin 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Dark fruit, green bell pepper and pronounced minerality define the nose. The palate is firm, green and mineral driven, lacking the sweet fruit needed for greater harmony. Tannic and imposing, yet admirably fresh. Not a vintage to chase, though the liquid stone minerality is compelling. Around 90pts.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Château Latour Grand Vin 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Highly expressive and intense, with a nose that feels almost 2009-like in its liqueur fruit and oak presence. Menthol freshness provides lift. The palate is rich and sweet, nearly excessive, though supported by freshness that keeps it from heaviness. Oak remains prominent. Hedonistic and powerful, yet slightly too ripe and hot for my taste. The substance is undeniable and time may bring greater harmony, but on this night it felt riper than the 2003.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2006 Château Latour Grand Vin 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Dense, dark nose marked by fruit, tannin and notable oak. The palate is cleaner and more open but lacks substance and charm. Wood tannins remain slightly harsh. 89 to 90pts.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Château Latour Grand Vin 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Medium expressive bouquet with dark fruit, green bell pepper and classic Pauillac minerality. Inviting and charming. The palate delivers ripe fruit balanced by minerality and green notes, evolving subtly in the glass. Ripeness and oak are better managed than in 2005. Slightly warm but enjoyable. On this night I preferred the 2010’s purity, even though it scored marginally lower due to its youth.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2010 Château Latour Grand Vin 94 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Still not fully open. Intriguing nose with darker fruit and strong minerality. The palate remains monolithic and youthful, with noticeable oak and significant ripeness. Tannins are of superb quality and balance is present, though freshness is good rather than exceptional. Difficult to judge today, but the substance is obvious and the long term potential considerable.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2012 Château Latour Grand Vin 95 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: A positive surprise. Slightly muted nose with fine dark fruit and Pauillac minerality. The palate is open and expressive, showing fresh dark fruit, herbs, earthy notes and integrated oak. Precise, clean and classic with a fine structural frame and excellent freshness. A sharp, elegant and highly satisfying Latour.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2015 Château Latour Grand Vin 96 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Fully open and beautifully layered bouquet with herbal notes, green bell pepper and pronounced minerality framed by ripe fruit. On the palate, coffee and classic nutty Latour tones add complexity. Superb delineation, perfect tannin quality and finely judged acidity. One of the stars of the evening alongside 1996 and 2003. Slightly pronounced fruit sweetness today, which should integrate further with age.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
2016 Château Latour Grand Vin 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted (but opened a few hours earlier). Latour remains one of Bordeaux’s most structurally formidable and intellectually compelling estates. The signature was unmistakable throughout: liquid stone minerality, Pauillac graphite, walls of tannin and distinctive nutty inflections. The 1996, 2003 and 2015 stood out on this night, each expressing Latour’s DNA in a different but convincing way. Several young vintages showed still a bit closed and monolithic, showing that Latour is one of the few Bordeaux that truly demands decades and rarely flatters in its early years, a stark contrast to today’s trend of early accessibility. Tasted head to head with the corresponding vintages of Montrose, Latour got an average score of 93.3pts vs Montrose scoring 92.0pts.
TN: Open nose with a broad fruit spectrum, yet somewhat monolithic. The palate is similarly fruit driven, ranging from fresh red berries to ripe dark tones, but lacking the mineral precision and complexity expected from Latour. Feels simple and somewhat ripe at this stage. The vintage is too strong to dismiss, and Latour always requires patience, but today this was not among the highlights. 92 to 93pts.
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No