Impromptu White Burgundy Tasting

Lake Elmo
Tasted Saturday, February 28, 2009 - Sunday, March 1, 2009 by vanpe003 with 635 views

Introduction

So, I was downstairs trying to reorganize some wines, and tipped over a box that had a bunch of '05 375ml btls, all white burgundies. So, I asked G. "hey, you up for a quick tasting", and I didn't have to wait long for the response. It was a good day for these, as we'd been stuck in a "red rut" for the last couple of weeks. While none of these wines were life-changing at this point, they were all quite good. Better yet, they were all picked up on the secondary market where somebody, for whatever reason, was in a big hurry to dump them at bargain prices. All of these burgundies are very nice wines for the price.

Flight 1 - The Whites (5 Notes)

Nothing much to add here, though it was quite a funny experience with the Kanu Chenin Blanc. I had mentioned to my wife that I was pulling some white burgundies from the cellar for the afternoon. I also stumbled across the bottle of Kanu and figured I might as well open it, hate it, and pour it out. Suffice it to say it didn't work out that way!

  • 2005 Kanu Chenin Blanc 88 Points

    South Africa, Coastal Region, Stellenbosch

    (3/1/2009)

    Opened this up as part of a mini-housecleaning, with every belief it would go down the sink. How wrong I was. This is much better than a bottle I had 18 months ago, with a smoothness and body that suggests something other than South African Chenin Blanc. The high acidity from last time around has completely integrated. This one fooled G., who knew I had some white burgundies in the fridge. Yes, this is that good!

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2005 Domaine Louis Michel Chablis 1er Cru Montmains 89 Points

    France, Burgundy, Chablis, Chablis 1er Cru

    (3/1/2009)

    Once again, similar to prior outings, though this time I'm enjoying the nuttiness more, worrying about it less. Comes across as creamy. Still not a typical Chablis, at least in my experience.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2005 Domaine Matrot Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru Les Chalumeaux 90 Points

    France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru

    (3/1/2009)

    When tasted against the other wines opened today, it becomes more obvious that this is still quite a bit too young. I would look to hold remaining bottles for 12 months to let some of it's acidity resolve. While I think this could be the best wine for the long term of those opened today, it does not show all that well today for my palate.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2005 Domaine / Maison Vincent Girardin Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru Abbaye de Morgeot Vieilles Vignes 91 Points

    France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru

    (3/1/2009)

    Similar to prior notes, though this time the oak is joined by a noticeably sweet perfume on both nose and palate, particularly immediately on opening. A hint of nuttiness comes as the wine evolves the glass. I really enjoy this style, and most of the wines I've had from Girardin. This does pale against the Folataires, which is more resolved and balanced at this point in its life. There is more than a 1 pt difference between the two at this point in their lives, but I can't figure out which one I've over/under rated.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2005 Domaine / Maison Vincent Girardin Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru Les Folatières 92 Points

    France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru

    (3/1/2009)

    The best white of the day, this has a remarkably integrated palate for this early in its life. Very, very well balanced. Great fruit, integrated acidity, light but not distracting oak. While I'm sure this will improve with some additional age, I'm really impressed with how well it's drinking now.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

Flight 2 - The Reds (2 Notes)

A bit of house cleaning here, though the Laughing Magpie is actually quite a nice wine. The "2 Worlds" would've been fine on a different day, on its own. Nothing wrong with it, but nothing special either.

  • 2003 Quinta do Alqueve (Pinhal da Torre) Tejo 2 Worlds Reserva 86 Points

    Portugal, Ribatejo, Tejo

    (3/1/2009)

    Another one of those wines that I'd be perfectly happy to have as a glass pour at a bistro. More acidity than I would like to see in a wine made of 50% cab.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2001 d'Arenberg The Laughing Magpie Shiraz-Viognier 91 Points

    Australia, South Australia, Fleurieu, McLaren Vale

    (3/1/2009)

    I really enjoy this, though truth be told, it probably suffers a bit from not being adequately prepped (stored upside down, should've allowed a week or so for the sediment to settle back to the bottom). That said, this is a nice bottle of wine that appears to be at its peak. Medium bodied, it's nicely balanced on the palate, with a nice amount of food friendly structure/acidity still remaining.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

Flight 3 - Earlier in the Weekend (6 Notes)

Some reds were opened yesterday. Of these, there were a few disappointments, including the Twisted Oak and the obviously flawed '94 Phelps. The Twisted Oak was actually the greater of the two disappointments. I get used to a corked wine once in awhile, which was the case with the Phelps. The Twisted Oak wasn't flawed. It just underperformed against what I had come to expect from this winery. The winners of this group were the Thea's, the Hess, and the Insignia.

  • 2003 Twisted Oak *%#&@! 87 Points

    USA, California, Sierra Foothills

    (2/28/2009)

    Opens up seemingly rich, but somehow closes down 5 minutes later with a thinner than expected palate. Will revisit this one later. Disappointing after the other Twisted Oaks I've had. Update: better the second day, but a medicinal note on the palate that's not to my taste.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2003 Laetitia Winery Pinot Noir Reserve 89 Points

    USA, California, Central Coast, Arroyo Grande Valley

    (2/28/2009)

    Notes of sour cherry on the nose. After 30 minutes, nicely balanced on the palate. Maybe a touch of bitterness on the finish, but nothing too overt. Relatively full bodied and silky, but not particularly sweet or cloying. Given the weight, I'd probably normally prefer something with a bit less in terms of "sour".

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 2004 Lemelson Vineyards Pinot Noir Thea's Selection 91 Points

    USA, Oregon, Willamette Valley

    (2/28/2009)

    Initially seems closed, both on nose and palate (88pts). Will need to revisit later. Update: after an hour or so open, this gets back to where it should be. Lush both on nose and palate. Reminds me as much of a well-behaved Cali pinot as it does one from OR. Update: even better the second day.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 1994 Joseph Phelps Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley Flawed

    USA, California, Napa Valley

    (2/28/2009)

    Damn. Corked. Badly. Underneath seemed to be a nice texture.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 1995 The Hess Collection Cabernet Sauvignon Mt. Veeder 91 Points

    USA, California, Napa Valley, Mt. Veeder

    (2/28/2009)

    Sweet leather on the nose. On the palate - normally I don't like the tarry note I find in this one, but it is so slight, and slow well integrated into the rest of the palate (a kind of chocolate smoothness) that it gives character in this situation. Almost reminds me a bit of a brunello.....

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

  • 1986 Joseph Phelps Insignia 92 Points

    USA, California, Napa Valley

    (2/28/2009)

    Spicy cedar reminds me of a men's cologne, joined by aged cab fruit on the nose. Spicier and brighter than many its age. The same can be said for the palate, which is still focused and lively. I'll come back to this later in the day. Not as good as the '86 Heitz Martha's, but better than most of the '86 Mondavi Reserves. UPDATE: doesn't really get any better with air at first, but after 4-5 hours this does change in character in positive way, with more body on the palate. I wanted to see what this was like to see if I should buy a couple more. I'm on the fence. Maybe at the right price.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No

×
×