Seasonal
Tasted Friday, April 24, 2009 by Keith Levenberg with 654 views
A few years ago Matt Kramer wrote of Kathryn Kennedy's 1990 Santa Cruz Mountains cabernet that it "has the questionable distinction of having reported the lowest yield I've ever heard of in California: one-quarter ton per acre." The back label of the 2007 Rhys Horseshoe Ranch discloses an even lower yield of 0.20 tons per acre. This might have been my favorite of the pinots today. The aromatics are closed, but it's a serious step up from the Family Farm on the palate; in fact it tastes the way the Family Farm smells, like it's packed with crushed stones. Super-silky in texture, too, a grand cru performance.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Enticing scent of crushed stones. Somewhat reminds me of the style of a lot of '06 Burgundies I've experienced lately in that there is a slightly candied edge to the fruit but the material is nevertheless airy and not as glossy as the flavor tends to connote. The tannins are nice and silky although the alcohol (which is pretty low by the numbers) feels a bit firm on the back end. Overall though, way more interesting and sophisticated than the declassified Family Farm juice in the '06 San Mateo.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Closer in style to the two '07s than to any of the three '06s from the Alpine Vineyard. In fact very similar in profile to the '07 Horseshoe Ranch although there's an extra something going on that tastes almost smoky. Extremely feminine and pure silk in texture, lean in the best way. An Audrey Hepburn wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A sea change in style after the Home Vineyard. The density and inkiness are almost a shock to the system. Like my last experience with this wine a few months ago, the scent is practically a textbook in whole-cluster aromatics.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Not a huge difference vis-a-vis the standard Alpine. Seems a bit more tannic on the palate and a bit sweeter in scent, not a candied sweetness but the effect is to smooth out some of the standard Alpine's stalkiness. An obvious sibling to that wine, though, in terms of density and mouthfeel. In fact there doesn't seem to be a hell of a lot of difference right now among the three of them.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Hard to tell if this is less tannic than the standard Alpine and the Hillside version or if it simply a bit more concentrated and the inkiness of the fruit is simply covering it up. Eventually, and it takes a while, the stoniness becomes more apparent, but there is still a lot of primary fruit on the surface. I know the C.W. has this as the star of the 2006 lineup, but sadly I still preferred the Home for its gentler touch.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
I was surprised to like this as much as I did. Very round and plump with a sap to it that makes it practically sumptuous. Way better than the regular Sonoma Coast.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Seems weightier than it did before, but also juicier. At this point, it needs more polish. Having the '07 Family Farm to compare it with confirms that declassifying this was the right thing to do.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Smells stemmy, and tastes a little shrill in its acidity.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Really nice to come back to this after the disappointing Sonoma Coast and San Mateo. This is much closer in style to the really attractive Chileno Valley, and it's showing more extra-vinous depth and savoriness than it did last year.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.
2007 Rhys Chardonnay Alpine Vineyard 91 Points
USA, California, Santa Cruz Mountains
Bigger and thicker than the 2006, not sure if that's simply because it's a year younger or because it's a more concentrated wine. Either way, this is just as bright with a chalky minerality contributing to its freshness. It keeps its size and scale as it sits in the glass but gains in detail. I originally preferred the 2006 but by the end this had pulled ahead.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2006 Rhys Chardonnay Alpine Vineyard 93 Points
USA, California, Santa Cruz Mountains
My gut impression on the first sip was that this might be the best-yet chardonnay from Rhys. Just a fantastic texture here. Grippy and with a density that almost feels gelatinous, but not in a flabby way, and it turns fresher and drier as you savor it. Like the '07 it gains in detail as it sits in the glass and eventually develops such a grinding traction to the texture that it's almost more like an Austrian riesling or gruner than any chardonnay you might compare it to. No sign at all of the butteriness it showed two months ago.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue