Tasted Wednesday, October 12, 2005 by psmith with 2,002 views
This was an even organized by Classics restaurant in Cleveland. Jen and I saw it as a rare opportunity to try some wines normally out of our price range. The dinner was well organized and of very high quality with great parings. Sommelier Manuel Nieves and Wilson-Daniels rep Brian Lynch were gracious hosts and gave a thorough introduction to the wines.
The evening started with a Champagne from the always wonderful Salon. Jen and I enjoyed a couple of glasses with great starters while waiting for the other 16 guests.
A great classic country French dish with an equally great wine. Those who question the very-good '01 Burgundy vintage should be forced to try this wine.
The wine chosen to pair with this dish, an '02 DRC Montrachet, was a star. I kept my 3-4 oz. glass until the very end of the night, over which it continued to evolve and grow.
Unquestionably the pairing, and dish, of the night. The subtle gaminess of the food complemented this dish wonderfully and brought out a sweetness in the wine characteristic of a far younger Echezeaux.
As good as the cheeses were, I felt it a shame to not taste the '02 Romanee Conti without food. I held my glass the remainder of the night over which this young wine developed layer upon layer of exotic complexity. While it's often said that it takes 20-25 years for Romanee-Conti to surpass La Tache in its greatness, it was clearly the star of the reds tonight.
A well crafted dessert, but a train-wreck of a pairing. DRC wines have a characteristic wonderful sweetness that's totally destroyed by the chocolate in this dish. I figured this would be the case and was sure to enjoy a full glass of the La Tache before having seconds and trying the dessert. This only further verifies my opinion that chocolate and wine are just not good bedfellows, if it must be done the wine needs to be sweeter than the chocolate.
An additional wine presented before the checks. I don't think Sauternes. works with chocolate either so I gave my desser back, skipped the coffee, and enjoyed the d'Yquem on it's own.
After the tasting ended at about 10:00, Jen and I were still perfectly coherent and looking for more to drink. A few other guests stayed for what turned into a blowout end to a great tasting, with Manuel playing the exceedingly generous host by pulling out wine after wine as glasses were emptied. In response to one guest's remark that he "hadn't had a good '00 Napa Cab" Manuel brought a blind wine which turned out to be a Jen-identified '00 Silver Oak Napa which I didn't get around to taking notes on. While it probably didn't change many opinions on the vintage (which I happen to think produced some very good wines), it was solid with cherries, oak, and a characteristic '00 green streak. Jen and I left at about 1:00 after polishing off a "palate cleansing" Krug Rose while the other headed out for even more. Thanks again to Manny for his generosity!
The wines were, of course, very young and none, with the possible exception of the '89 Echezeaux was showing it's full potential; however, this was a wonderful experience and, without question, the most memorable Wednesday night dinner I've ever been fortuante enough to participate in.
1995 Salon Champagne Blanc de Blancs Brut
France, Champagne
A young, light beer color with an ultra-fine bead. Elegant nose of white flowers and baking bread with some crisp, just ripe apples. Austere and youthful on the palate. Lighter bodied than I'm used to with Salon, but very round and integrated on the frount. Good length that exposes some heat on the finish. Loads of acidity, should age nicely. ***+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No