backstreet wine salon
Tasted Thursday, April 30, 2009 by jeff nowak with 1,149 views
tannic and full of mature notes, especially tea, but lacked nuance.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
nicely composed, mature notes, especially in the first hour. the wine went bye-bye after that.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
evolved, unable to coax much out of the glass.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
huge step up from the 88. this wine has deep concentration and beautiful fruit. drink or hold.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
green and somewhat bitter acid. a dud, especially within context.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
seemingly in transition, and couldn't run with the rest of the 99 firsts. hold.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
a spoofilated attempt to get something out of not much. overtly tannic, and i'm not optimistic about it's ability to develop.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
a beautiful young bordeaux that reminds me how special the 03 vintage should become. a home run for the house.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
quite fetching. smooth tannin and boldly concentrated fruit. interesting vintage.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
soft and reserved, no distinction.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
showy, even at this young age. outstanding balance, and expression of fruit. tannic, for sure, but those tannins are very well tuned/silky. this is a blockbuster for the house. will improve.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
i've had this enough to know it's a legend in the making. one of the few bottles that went thru some prep via decanting. weird, almost bitter out of the gate. it settled down and peeked out from under the hood. this ferrari needs to be garaged for a while.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
one of the few wines in the tasting that i just didn't care for. i'll chalk it up to a bad bottle, but not flawed in the specific sense.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
lots of discussion about whether or not this was corked; not readily apparent to me. seemed to follow the vintage theme of being transitional.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
looks like i'm not a fan of the 01 first growths. very tannic, consistent with a wine where the fruit won't catch up.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
rich and excellent balance of fruit. showed some traditional power and grace/femininity. underrated vintage.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
left bank wine of the vintage/finest first growth? i certainly think so. didn't show the awkward aspect of other 99s. savory.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
expressive, fine tannin, still developing. drink or hold.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
more firmly structured than the 83 pichon, but not as keenly balanced. this was a bit harsh, in fact. not a wine i would hold or seek out.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
a total brett bomb to me, although i didn't hear this complaint from others.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
as this flight progressed, i wasn't embracing the mid 80s latour ethos. little to distinguish itself here. a very average wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
finally, a latour to enjoy. nice structure, needs air/decanting, the most backward of the 98s.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
i felt this was a fabulous young bordeaux, and i might have been too hasty in calling out the margaux as vintage first growth top dog. in fact, i will annoit the latour because it has a more interesting complexity with more to develop as it ages. super wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
i am unaware of tasting this wine in any vintage prior, so i spent more time with it. dried fruits, honey-tinged. seemingly botrytis challenged, and rather softly delineated. solid, but not impressive.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
pleasing wine, consistent with previous thoughts. suffered next to the 01.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
from magnum! showy for the format. seemingly bulletproof to time and/or format. no additional useful thoughts on this wine which i've now had countless times.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2000 Dom Pérignon Champagne 90 Points
France, Champagne
i guess they'll just declare every year now, huh? not a bad wine, but very light, and not a lot of complexity. certainly fresh...and routine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Château Margaux Pavillon Blanc 93 Points
France, Bordeaux
lovely focus and balance. semillion takes charge.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No