KPB
Posts: 4658
Joined: 11/25/2012 From: Ithaca, New York Status: offline
|
One thing I find striking right now is how similar and even monolithic many of the wines from the high end of Napa ratings turn out to be. I've been able to visit Vine Hill Ranch, Bond, Promontory, Ovid, Verite. (although Verite isn't truly a Napa Winery) and have tasted tons of others: Harlan, Colvin, Futo, Hundred Acre, Bryant Family, Dominus, Opus One, Kapcsandy, and if I counted past vintages too as opposed to just recent ones, I could add maybe twenty to that list just in Napa. Yet while many are super expensive, few really work for me. So many of the wines turn out to be ponderous and dull, concentrated to the point of seeming thick and syrupy, overly oaked, too high in alcohol. A few have strange palates, like the Colgin and Kapcsandy wines (to my taste, obviously. Your reaction may differ!) So while I actually really love Bond St Eden, Vecina, and Pluribus, and now I'll add VHR, and perhaps Verite Le Desir and La Joie, many of the others leave me puzzled. I bought a bottle of the 2014 Ovid Cab Franc wine for my daughter's birthday, and I know she will love it, but I don't know that I would rush to buy it in every vintage. They do love oak at Ovid... would that dominate in other vintages? I've certainly had great Montebello from Ridge... but I've also had heavy, hot bottles very much in the monster cab model. So I think vineyard certainly matters, a lot. But "there is many a slip twixt the vine and the lip." So in this are a cluster of wineries located within a stones throw of one-another, yet only a few are wines I would buy without hesitation.
_____________________________
Ken Birman The Professor of Brettology
|