Anakena Ona White Blend

CellarTracker Main Site

Anakena Ona White Blend

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Cellar Talk] >> Wine Data Errors & Corrections >> Anakena Ona White Blend

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Anakena Ona White Blend - 11/20/2007 6:49:22 PM

iByron

Posts: 305
Joined: 5/21/2007
Status: offline

Anakena Ona is a "premium" designation from Anakena Winery in Chile. Per the Anakena website:

"ONA comprises two blends, one red, one white, an extraordinary Syrah and an exquisite Sauvignon Blanc."

They actually make three red blends, two of which have records in CT (266422 & 354059) with designation "Ona [component varietals]," which is how it appears on the label and web site.

The white blend then should appear likewise, "Ona Viognier Riesling Chardonnay." There are records for 2004-2006 and I've made edits to the 2005 record (263118).

Question: What is the standard for entering these designations which indicate the blend? I notice that most Australian Shiraz/Viognier blends are entered "Shraz - Viognier" (space, dash, space) while the Lanquedoc Roussillon Viognier/Muscat blends are entered "Viognier-Muscat" (no spaces). Meanwhile the two red ONA blends are entered without dashes at all. Yeah I know that's a bit anal, but if there's a protocol, I'd like to follow it.

BTW, Anakena also spells ONA in all caps. I didn't in my edit, as the other records don't, but just calling it to attention.

Byron

Post #: 1

RE: Anakena Ona White Blend - 11/21/2007 9:23:54 AM

Eric

Posts: 17326
Joined: 10/10/2003
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

Got the white. Enter 'em the way they appear on the label.

_____________________________

Cheers!
-Eric LeVine

http://twitter.com/cellartracker
http://facebook.com/cellartracker

(in reply to iByron)

Post #: 2