PinotPhile
Posts: 3728
Joined: 3/16/2014 From: Southern CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hankj quote:
ORIGINAL: PinotPhile quote:
ORIGINAL: midpalate at ~150 bottles now. I'm aiming to get below 100, but that's been the goal for ~2 years, and the count has remained in the 120-160 range that whole time. Huh. I looked at what records I had from my pre-CT days. It appears that I hit the 100 milestone late 2013 or early 2014. Records are better now, and holding at the 110-130 range if all bottles of wine possessed are counted. Even the daily drinkers. In multiple locations, granted, but that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I am not in the least skilled at moratorium. I "target" remaining below 130. Now 117. Maybe I don't have a problem..... Cheers! Can I ask either/both of you why you're striving for "small" cellars? It seem many if not most here are going for thousands of bottles, a minority like me are plunking away slowly accumulating hundreds. And the smallest minority like you two seem to aspire to "just" double digits. What's the rationale behind going small? From the perspective of someone who basically had 50 bottles or less for years, I am no longer "small". That said, in no particular order: Strong frugality ethic. Desire to avoid any offsite storage. Bit of a neat freak. Enjoy the research and careful selection of "forced choices" within a budget. Oh, and strong frugality ethic. I do occasionally splurge on a case, but that is rare. Fortunately, CT makes room for all of us. Last year, I met a collector who had no idea whether he had 6000 bottles or 10,000 bottles, but knew it was within that range. I wondered what he will actually DO with all that juice. Considering he was at least 60 years old. Do not want to have anything like that problem. Cheers!
|