BRR
Posts: 1846
Joined: 9/1/2009 From: Seattle, WA Status: offline
|
I popped a bottle of 2002 Cayuse En Chamberlin Vineyard Syrah last week and was floored. A short back story: I decided, on a lark years ago, to sign up for this mailing list of a winery I had started to hear buzz about, Cayuse. I had very little disposable income, so had absolutely no business buying anything. However, I went in for a case of Syrah. Then, the following year, I thought better of the sudden expenditure and didn't buy. Bye-bye mailing list spot. I drank most of them within the first two to three years, and liked them fine. Fast forward to last week, and I have one of each En Chamberlin, En Cerise, and Cailloux. I'm back on the list today and have ordered the '13 and '14, but don't plan to touch them anytime soon (when I actually get them). Folks have said that Quilceda Creek underwent a significant stylistic shift somewhere around the 1998 vintage in which they went away from a more restrained Cab to the modern, very concentrated, more oak-driven Cab. With this 2002 Syrah from Cayuse, I was absolutely shocked at how much luscious fruit was there. Sure, there was some funk, earth, meatiness in there, but the most notable thing about the wine was the gorgeous fruit. When I've been fortunate to taste a few more recent Cayuse vintages (thanks in very large part to the amazingly generous Seattle CT Offline Crew!), I notice more funk, earth, etc. and less overt fruit. So, my ultimate question is this: for you experienced Cayuse drinkers, has Christophe undergone any stylistic changes over the years? Has he purposely played up the "Rocks" character in his wines. Or, will this gorgeous fruit come out with age? Was there a "shift," even a minor one, akin to what QCreek did (meaning, a change, not what many consider to be a bad change in the case of Quilceda)?
_____________________________
Cheers!
|