KPB
Posts: 4648
Joined: 11/25/2012 From: Ithaca, New York Status: offline
|
In the current market I would probably focus on 2005 and 2009, personally, although I happen to love some 2010 reds (despite the tendency of that vintage to push the limits on ripeness). The 2005 CnDP are fully mature now and some have really opened up and become stunners (Pegau, Marcoux, Janasse VV). But a few wines remain stubbornly tannic and probably won't improve. I always found this vintage puzzling -- no idea what made the tannins so fierce, and it was almost universal. I would jump to buy these if you run into good deals, but check recent TNs as a way to notice "issues". Mine are under KPB. 2006 was a minor vintage and just fine, but not thrilling. 2007 is definitely very ripe, rich, and for my palate, often unbalanced. I bought far too many of the 2007 wines and wish I had tried more of them before jumping in. On the other hand at the very top, wines like Pegau da Capo, you had actual 100pt wines in 2007 -- not a score I often hand out! 2007 won't be a source of bargains because the vintage was scored very high by WA. 2008 was ok, but again, nothing amazing. I've been really happy with the 2009 vintage -- I bought heavily in that vintage and they have really been lovely wines. I recommend these and they are drinking well. A bit more classical (== lighter, more balanced, more interesting noses), just maturing now. Great pricing too. 2010 is a complicated vintage (and those won't be cheap in any case). My broad sense is that the the vintage a bit on the overripe and heavy side. As they mature some of the less well-made wines are starting to seem a bit stewed (like Clos St. Jean, Usseglio Mon Aueil, Clos des Papes); you won't find TNs from me on those because I've tasted them and kind of rejected them as not my style. Yet there are some GREAT 2010 reds. As usual, Pegau delivered a great wine call it a triple if 2007 was a home run). Marcoux was very strong in this vintage, and Beaucastel. On the other hand, some of my normal favorites like Charvin seem to have found it hard to get balance in 2010 and seems a bit awkward to me. You don't often see 2011 in the market, it wasn't viewed as much of a vintage. I've only purchased a few bottles from 2011, and wouldn't say that I've formed a particularly positive impression. In fact most of what I bought was from the north, not CnDP. I don't have a lot of TNs from 2012 although we did visit the area a few times when these were being released and I've certainly drunk a fair number and bought 2 cases. I only have rather negative TNs from 2013, even from producers I often like. To avoid. In 2014 I mostly purchased northern Rhone reds. 2015 was sensational in the north, but prices are very high. As for the south, I've certainly consumed a few 2014 and 2015 reds and tasted a few 2016s. The usual suspects (for me: Pegau, Charvin, Marcoux, Beaucastel, Janasse VV) are all wines I would be fine with owning, if I wanted more wine in my cellar right this second. Don't have strong impressions on any of them yet and none has screamed "buy me!" the way the top 2010 wines did on release. And none has seemed infinitely seductive and appealing instantly, like that 2009 Pegau, either.
_____________________________
Ken Birman The Professor of Brettology
|