Echinosum
Posts: 604
Joined: 1/28/2021 From: Buckinghamshire, UK Status: offline
|
I don't think you can/should be able to claim for a wine being corked, because it is - mostly - a bottle by bottle risk. But what about more pervasive wine faults that would affect a whole barrel, or the whole production of that wine? I recently had a half case of wine which all suffered from terrible mousy taint, they were undrinkable. It evidently doesn't affect all bottles of that wine, because there are 31 tasting notes on CT for that wine, and no one else had a flawed bottle. And in fact I had two half-cases, and the other one was fine. Some wines they "equalise" them by mixing it all up in a large tank when bottling. Others evidently are bottled barrel by barrel, or in multiple batches, and I can only think that is what happened here. Being corked can sometimes be more pervasive. I have a case of Climens 1995, and a lot of the bottles are perceptible corked, maybe a third, and this time it is not just me finding that. I suspect a barrel problem rather than individual corks. But it is odd how it varies by bottle. Even those where I can't say it's corked, it's still very disappointing for a wine of that reputation in what is supposedly the 2nd or 3rd best year of the 90s. Apparently that can be the result of a low level of TCA. Would this be a case for compensation? Or should people look at the publicly available tasting notes for the wine and buy knowing that it is its record?
_____________________________
A discriminating palate can be a curse.
|