thomasjacques
Posts: 46
Joined: 11/18/2015 Status: offline
|
I hear you and I am not a fan of "hybrid" producer names either. I looked up the french "Registry of Commerce", and I could not find a company incorporated under that name in the Jura department (postcode 39*). On the other hand, Mr. Dominique Grand is indeed registered as an "Individual entrepreneur" (sources : here and here). So apparently "La Maison de Rose" is a brand name for the domaine, not a legal company name. Now generally speaking, should legal entity names be your north star for the Producer field ? Here is an interesting case, also of a producer that is more significant to the community (3800 bottles in Cellars vs 20) : Domaine du Coulet (Matthieu Barret). Looking again at the "Registry of Commerce" I can see 3 legal entities : - Monsieur Matthieu Barret - registered "individual entrepreneur" - in the business of growing fruit and making wine - Matthieu Barret SARL - commercial entity - in the business of selling wine (both negoce and domaine wines, since you get only one invoice when you go and buy both) - GFA du Domaine du Coulet - "groupement foncier agricole" - in the business of owning and renting land (presumably to Monsieur Matthieu Barret) So which entity should count as the Producer ? The one owning the land, the one making the wine or the one selling it ? In my opinion, the pragmatic choice for CT is to use whatever name the producers themselves want to be called. In the case of La Maison de Rose, it's quite clear they use both the winemaker's name and this brand name they have come up with. Only my 2 cents obviously. If you decide to stick to "Dominique Grand", can you please at least remove "La Maison de Rose" from the Designations ?
|