LionGaucho
Posts: 220
Joined: 6/1/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: fingers Does everyone accept the definition "Old World = Europe" & "New World = everywhere else"? I think the line continues to increasingly blur. From my experience, there's really not much susbstitute for Burgundy, Loire, or Champagne. Italian varietals and winemaking are also certainly distinguished, but there are an increasing number of California producers coming very close to those profiles, too. And with all of the excellent Bordeaux blends coming from Southern Hemi and USA, I don't think the Bordeauxlytes can claim any supremacy since "Judgement of Paris". When it comes to style, I keep hearing about European wines made in a New World style and vice versa - New World territory producing OW style . So is it geography or performance? I often think the snob says, "If I like it, it's Old World. If I don't, it's New World" regardless of where it's from. Nice post, especially the last line. I'm tending to find the more traditional or restrained New World producers and the more modern Old World producers meet in the middle. This is the information age and all of the techniques and methodologies are known by all. I do think there are big differences in the fruit itself from say California to traditional French regions like Burgundy. Aside from younger vine age, there is no rain during the growing season, irrigation is often necessary, minimally irrigated vines tend towards low yields, there's a large diurnal flux, grape clusters need a good canopy and vines are widely spaced in California. For Burgundy, take everything above, and make it the opposite. Dry farmed, closely spaced vines, no canopy, large yields without dropping fruit, etc., etc. So I tend to think there are certain terroir differences that are accentuated when the winemaking is done in a transparent manner. I actually think there is great potential to apply a true Bordeaux or Burgundian style in California, but consumers here generally want wines that drink well young. There is no motivation to make a wine that ignorant consumers will shun because of its massive, age-worthy structure. That said, for now, I tend to find these modern Old Worlds and traditional New Worlds right up my alley. If you can find Cali winemakers who came from the Tchelistcheff school prior to the "we need 28 Brix for phenolic ripeness" movement, these are real wines, different but of comparably quality to the Old World. Conversely, scientific knowledge has advanced greatly and knowing how to get ripe, concentrated fruit in cool rainy climates has probably evened out vintage variation in the Old World. There are still issues with misapplication of oak and excessive ripeness, but modernity is not all bad.
|