cgrimes
Posts: 1571
Joined: 10/8/2007 From: Massachusetts Status: offline
|
Ok, here are 2 that I love for their self-acknowleged pretensiousness and sheer raw emotion. Here's a guy who really feels strongly about wine, and any deficiencies are a personal affront to his palate. Agree or disagree, I'd rather read his TN over mine any day 2002 Bodegas Caro (Barons de Rothschild/Catena) CARO "14.0% alcohol. mendoza, argentina. this is a collaborative effort with lafite rothschild, and is a cabernet + malbec blend. i guess i had heard about it, and i have certainly enjoyed wines from nicolas catena before; so when the costco wine guy raved about it, i tossed one in the cart ($27). now, i know what's happening here. you are saying to yourself, "****, my man, why would you take the advice of the costco wine slave? after all, you are a distinguished and respected member of the parker wine board, and thousands of people hang on your TN's whenever they are posted. surely, you don't need to experiment at the lower end of the food chain, especially after having bought some older vintage cheval blanc yesterday from boardmember alan weinberg." and you would be correct, karnak breath. this wine sucks. however, said costco wine slave was also kind enough to recently have called me personally in order to tell me that he had 3 bottles (750 ml) of 2001 d'yquem at $360 per, and would i be interested? and you would be right again, king tut sarcophagus breath. so, in order to be nice, i bought the caro. but that's it, he's used up all his bonus miles with this flight of the turkey. extremely tart upon opening, that has settled down into the 2 x 8 that it is. thin in the mid palate, and so blitheringly boring in the finish and mouthfeel, that all this has going for it is a mildly pleasant nose, and the fact that it probably isn't toxic. if this were $9, i'd still say don't buy, because i tasted the 04 mc manis cab yesterday, and it is WAY better. our fearless leader hasn't rated it, but WS has...91 points. OMG! blasphemy. apparently, this is what happens when 2 quality houses get together and try to manufacture a wine for the marketplace. truly shameful. not recommended (duh!). Here's another one: 2003 Dominus Estate 14.1% alcohol. napa valley. i don't know the blending of this wine, perhaps someone can enlighten me; and yet, i really don't care. i picked this up on the fly from costco for $93. i guess $93 is the new impulse buying level. it's not a wine i have been purchasing over the years, and this tasting only confirms that i've been making the right decision. we might as well run through the usual littany of normal responses when i trash an icon: you drank it too young you didn't decant it enough it will be better on day three you had a bad bottle you're an idiot this wine is as boring as a 20th high school reunion, and for $92, even a guy like me who doesn't give one rat's ass about QPR, has to say, "no mas!" you just can't put a famous winemaker's name on the label, and then barely go through the motions to produce something that a UC davis third year wannabe could make in the trunk of his corolla. no flaws, just no anything, except for dusty tannin, not enough fruit, and some insipid cassis. drinkable, but a major disappointment. (613 views) Hope you enjoyed!
|