Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Red

2016 Kosta Browne Pinot Noir Bootlegger's Hill

Pinot Noir

  • USA
  • California
  • Sonoma County
  • Russian River Valley

Back to wine details

Community Tasting Note

  • msuwine wrote: 93 points

    November 4, 2019 - I’ve been a fan of the Cirq label from its outset, since it offers a more restrained version of the Kosta Browne single vineyard wines - powerful, but not as sweet. Although Kosta Browne is taking over the Bootlegger’s Hill vineyard in 2017, I decided to taste these two 2016 versions side-by-side: one from Kosta Browne (the heir apparent) and one from Cirq (the departing winery). Given this brief intersection in time, were the wines that different?

    Um, no - not really. They are each juicy, lively, and nuanced - right down the middle of the modern Pinot line, with ripeness but also typicity. I’ve lately found many KB wines to be rich and saccharine, but this was not the case here. I liked the Cirq better, since it had a more floral, intense, pure, and settled profile, but each is good - and hard to distinguish from each other. Onto the details:

    - Color. Both offer bright cherry, almost translucent profiles, with the Cirq being slightly more dark.

    - Body. Each had a similar mouthfeel, though the Cirq was the more heavy of the two. Each was medium in body, with few teardrops on the glass and a pleasant lift at the end. (The Cirq was 14.5% alcohol, the Kosta Browne 14.1%.)

    - Nose. The Cirq was more reticent, with notes of cranberry, dried herbs, and gravel. The KB was more pungent and fruity, with notes of sour cherry and rosemary. Both have an herbal and gravy tilt, but the KB offers more fruit.

    - Taste. The KB was more candied, though only slightly moreso. Each offered lovely notes of dried cranberry, sour cherry, menthol, and herbs. This was the hardest metric on which to tell them apart.

    - Finish. The Cirq was a little lighter in the exit, with a more lifted tone. The KB, in contrast, was a bit more sweet.

    These wines are virtually identical, so to taste one is to taste both (and don't buy both! ... like, um, a friend of mine). I opened each too early, but I think they will be plenty impressive in 2021 or later. In the interest of splitting no further hairs, I’d put the KB as a 93 and the Cirq as a 93+ at the moment. Both have real upside, though, so give them some time and see what happens.

    6 people found this helpful 4,120 views

4 Comments

  • brouigu1 commented:

    11/5/19, 6:29 AM - Nice well thought out review. I too have been a fan of Cirq & KB wine and bought into the KB version of these vineyards. I also considered doing a side by side but now I may not after reading your thoughts. Thank you for a well crafted summary of the two wines.

  • Andrew H commented:

    1/9/20, 10:18 AM - +1 to the previous comment - thanks for doing the side by side and providing a detailed, careful comparison.

  • air guitar & pinot noir commented:

    4/24/20, 9:50 PM - Well done MSU Wright. Comprehensive review and thoughtful comparison between these two. I hope to have a more controlled and measured tasting in the future.

  • jclary commented:

    6/7/20, 7:38 PM - We did the exact same tasting, and our conclusions exhobyours exactly. Wish our notes did as well but you are far more descriptive and detailed. Well done.

Add a Comment

© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close