Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Rosé - Sparkling

2012 Louis Roederer Champagne Vintage Brut Rosé

Champagne Blend

  • France
  • Champagne

Back to wine details

Community Tasting Note

  • aquacongas wrote: 92 points

    August 31, 2020 - not blind
    Very accessible and easy drinking. Very balanced maybe a touch too "sweet". A good structure and length. I would prefer 2013 at the Moment 92

    2 people found this helpful 2,890 views

6 Comments

  • 2020 commented:

    9/3/20, 10:10 PM - Thanks for the TN. I have some of these and am curious where they are at.

    Which between the 12' and 13' of this wine do you think will age longer? Which is the better wine in the end? Thx!

  • aquacongas commented:

    9/5/20, 2:41 AM - Really I don't know. At this stage they are very similar. 2013 a touch more generous. Maybe 2012 the better wine. At least 10-12 years ahead

  • 2020 commented:

    9/5/20, 7:01 PM - Okay. ... These age well don’t they for a Rose?

  • aquacongas commented:

    9/6/20, 2:34 AM - yes, they do. between 10-20 years

  • RolfT commented:

    11/29/21, 1:42 PM - Opened a 2004 last year and it was still drinking as if newly released..

  • 2020 commented:

    11/29/21, 10:53 PM - @RolfT, no kidding. Wow, that’s impressive. Do you attribute it to high quality fruit or is it the wine making? How many years do you think it will go for then?

Add a Comment

© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close