Bordeaux Siblings
Moss, Norway
Tasted June 1, 2012 by LWI with 1,228 views
Introduction
So many of the good Bordeaux vintages come in pairs. We tried some of them. Each sibling pair was tasted semi-blind, knowing the castle and the vintages to choose from, but not the order.
Flight 1 (2 notes)
Flight 2 (2 notes)
Flight 3 (4 notes)
Red
1982 Château Gruaud Larose
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Julien
A wonderful complex nose; both powerful and elegant at the same time, beef juice, bonfire, dry, perhaps a tad short. Nose a little better than the mouth. There should be better bottles.
Red
1983 Château Gruaud Larose
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Julien
Quite tight, but with warm fruit, forest floor. Fine wine but not on par with the 82.
Red
1983 Château Palmer
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
Wonderfully rounded, complex, a warmish fruit. Perhaps not an optimal bottle.
Red
1982 Château Palmer
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
Decent, but a little short, not really remarkable in any respect.
Flight 4 (1 note)
Flight 5 (8 notes)
Red
1986 Château Cos d'Estournel
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe
Dark berries, forest floor, some bonfire, a bit high in alcohol? However, ends a bit too soon, tight, and dry. Not exactly charming, but a lot structure: 'claret'.
Red
1985 Château Cos d'Estournel
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe
A little burned taste, tight, some green elements, fresh, correct, and could have been more concentrated.
Red
1985 Château Margaux
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
Cork was moldy and broke into many pieces. Champignon, forest floor, mature berries, complex, elegant, some sweetness. Although a very good wine, it was too developed, stored incorrectly?
Red
1986 Château Margaux
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
Very fresh and elegant, some graphite, fine acidity, bright fruit, minerals. Development still ahead.
Flight 6 (8 notes)
Red
1990 Château Pichon-Longueville Baron
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Primary fruit, but some tertial aromas settling in as well. Slight lack of concentration in the mid palate. Very fine lenght. Lovely wine.
Red
1989 Château Mouton Rothschild
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Classic, tobacco and underbrush, mature fruit. Very lovely, but a bit short, slightly astringent.
Red
1990 Château Mouton Rothschild
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Good deep fruit, coffee, tobacco, underbrush, up front and not particularly subtle. Sweet and 'what you see is what you get'.
Red
1990 Château Montrose
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe
A hint of burned wood, powerful, a bully, loads of extraction, some sweetness, long. Again, lots of everything. A close sibling to the 89 tasted alongside.
Red
1989 Château Montrose
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe
Classic notes, very powerful, dark berry fruit, some bonfire, black currents, graphite. A lot of everything, including tannin, primary, enormous concentration, but lacking in elegance. Still, I am utterly impressed.
Flight 7 (4 notes)
White - Sweet/Dessert
2001 Château Suduiraut
France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Sauternes
Finely spiced, bonfire (!), a surprising bitterness in the finish, opulent, much further developed than a bottle some years ago, and I suspect that this has been stored a bit too warm.
White - Sweet/Dessert
2001 Château d'Yquem
France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Sauternes
A little reticent on the nose, however leaves little doubt concerning which wine this is. Multifaceted, lightly spiced, elegant, fresh, very long. However, slightly less impressive than a bottle a few months back. Too warm storage?
White - Sweet/Dessert
2001 Château Rieussec
France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Sauternes
Some burned notes, heavy, almost massive, macrons, some complexity, though. I can see why some people like this – more than me, and I partly adhere to that, but the acidity is too low to make my day (night that is).
Closing
Biggest surprise: Cos 86, partly Margaux 86 and la Tour Blanche 2001. Some dubious bottles, particularly Margaux 85, and Gruaud 82 (both mine). I guess all of us were eager to taste the Montrose 90 and the 89 alongside. To me they were almost twins, not mere siblings, and very little differentiated them. Perhaps the 89 was a bit more elegant. One of the participants described these as ‘Winter Wines’, and I can relate to that. Imagine yourself by the fireplace after a long day in the snow, having some hearty food with your companion. This is a wine for that occasion. The Lafite 86 (in 30 years time) or the Margaux(in 15 years time), however, are the wines for an elegant haut cuisine.
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.