Epic bubbles (blinded)
Zorg's place, Umeå, Sweden
Tasted January 24, 2015 by StefanAkiko with 732 views
Introduction
First a warm-up flight with a great lecture by Vintomas. Then completely blind flights where we all needed to answer two Q's before unveiling.
Q1: Is this a Champagne? YES/NO
Q2: Score it 50-100p
A great practice in trusting your senses, humility and let-go. Masterfully led by Hjalle.
Flight 1 - Warming up! (3 notes)
A great lecture by Vintomas and some fabulous wines to support his examples and comparisons.
Light blue, very appealing colour from a drop of blueberry juice.
Fruity but not quite hygienically sound nose.
Simplistic taste and a coarse mineral character of too much mud. The fruit has a distinctly artificial aspect and feels mushy.
As this was not a cheap wine, I think that the producer needs to stand in the shame corner for a while.
This is really delicious, but I don't see where the hype is coming from. (One guy gave it 100p before tasting it.)
Rich, deep, long and with an exceptional balance. Lacking complexity and added dimensions to merit a higher score. Admittedly, I was a bit underwhelmed.
Has the quality of both maturity and freshness holding hands.
One of the furthest-away-wines from meriting its QPR.
* To the many people who were involved in the chain of events that led to this btl finally being served in Umeå: THANKYOU ALL! You know who you are. *
This btl is at the later half of its drinking plateau. Me like!
Flight 2 - Blinded Flight One (7 notes)
The SA wine, Graham Beck, fooled most of us as it's a well disguised "Champagneois" wine. And it also did very well on the general score board.
Creamy, deep, "simple but complex". Young. Very young. Balanced. Delicious. Earthy finish. Arrak pralines.
(100% Xarello.)
Fabulous acids, small bitterness. Complex and fantastic. Ends with grilled fishbones. Yum!
(The grand majority of tasters labeled this "Champagne".)
Much better on the palate. Balanced. Acid-driven (far too high levels for my taste).
Palate is rich and distinguished with juniper wood.
Slightly unusual, but rather appealing.
After learning that it was supposed to be this way and a reassessment: think that 92p is just about right.
Unclear wine that looks like Weissbier and an ongoing biological process.
Reluctantly smelled and tasted: unusual, quite interesting.
After learning about it: Quite complex and rather delicious, but BUTT UGLY.
Rich, intense, long but rather straight-forward and non-complex. No problem to drink this as a quaffer.
In the mouth, this is so acidic I couldn't force myself to a second sip. Completely not my taste. Not at all in balance.
Flight 3 - Blinded Flight Two (7 notes)
Terribly disappointing with the Kripta. Really looking forward to drinking it in pristine condition.
Tastes like a failed plonky bubbly. Muscat aromas on mud.
Creamy with the PERFECT balance. Acids, fruit, aromas, intensity, refinement, restraint... All the good things are here. Some age, but still young, so the best is yet to come.
Right up my bowling alley.
On the palate, this is a very fine, elegant, slim, distinguished wine. Aromas have a light touch of wild strawberries (smultron) and spring flowers. Youthful, has steely sharp acids with edges. Elegance in a light acid driven wine.
F**k!
Had so much looked forward to this wine.
Flat and uninteresting. Young with a clear potential for improvement. Small petrochem and what feels a bit like mouldy grapes or grilled rosemary.
Palate has a dainty, creamy mouthfeel. Rich with balancing acids and some refinement. Very young. Citrus: yuzu.
Palate is restrained and actually surprisingly small, given the rich nose. Well made, very delicious and balanced even if simple. Pure. Has a wee bit of umpa umpa in the finish, nudging my score from 81 to 84 on the score card.
Flight 4 - Blinded Flight Three (6 notes)
Dom P underperformed according to its price tag and fame. But, according to the experiences around the table, this is what DP usually performs in blinded tastings.
A small palate that is refined, sensitive and fine-tuned. Long, interesting with a rather fine, superb earthiness. Would go very well with food. But could use a some years in the cellar first.
Nothing refined to be found here.
Autolysis, round, broad, young nose.
First gulp: "Wow! This is made with umpa-umpa!" Even if the acids claw in on my tongue, I really like this. There is just so much going on in here. Citrus circus, balanced like a yoga master and: umpa-umpa-umpa!
Too thin and acidic for my taste. This wine does nothing for me tonight. Nothing wrong and the acid lovers enjoyed it more than I did.
Hints of early maturity. Delicious but rather light.
Utterly disgusting!
Flight 5 - Sweet wines and Cheese (2 notes)
***still looking for my notes on these***
I can't seem to find my notes on this one.
Added only to complete the TN's from the epic eve.
Flight 6 - After burners (3 notes)
Several of us needed tannins after this tasting. And our host also served some of the Imperial Palace imo-shouchu *yummy*.
This 20-odd-year-old dry fig-wine has clearly been down into the grave and come back. At least once. Like a VERY interesting Sherry. Ultra dry and with enough intriguing aromas to possibly wake the dead. Burnt toast. Oxidized aspects galore. Burnt hair. Strange rubbery aromas. Aromas of machinery and a very rainy summers day.
Has a particularily strong personality!
Best thing: There is more!
(Some raised concerns regarding possible health issues with drinking this.)
Closing
This tasting resulted in one of the worst hangovers I've ever had in my lifge and a nose bleed that lasted for almost two months. I'm not an acid lover, but the Carneros and I could still make very fine friends!
I had hoped that Cava would show off some of its greatness, but two flaws and one "unusual" btl made that unthinkable.
Winners out of 21 blind-tasted bubbly wines: