Quite a nice nose, with good fruity melon and a bit of lemon. Some minerality. The nose is maybe 89-90 points, but the palate lets it down, with not much going on. It seems a bit thin.

Very classic, somewhat austere chianti. tobacco, wet earth, leather etc. Not much fruit. Enjoyable, and good value, but i did not find it very interesting. 89-90.

My favorite wine at the tasting. Served in their tasting room, so I do not know how long the bottle had been open. Elegant with prominent tobacco, floral and mineral notes. Very complex already. A bit young and austere, but very enjoyable now. 93-94 points.

A second bottle tried a week later was much more closed and did not display the same complexity. If you are planning on enjoying this within the next couple of years, then you should let it breathe for a while first.

Decidely more modern in style than the 2012 Rancia. Darker with more red and black fruit notes, but less complexity and less floral and spicy notes. 91-92.

More modern in style than the rest of the Felsina range. Good dark fruit and a bit of minerality. However, the taste is a little short, and it is lacking in complexity. A nice wine, but better QPR in the Sangiovese dominated wines.

Nice, deep amber color. On the nose, we get walnuts, nice dried fruits, some lacquer notes and a light touch of sherry. Not too sweet nor austere. Very good vin santo. The score might be a bit low, as I am not traditionally a fan of the style.