9/23/23, 6:21 AM - not that harsh, just didn't like it much, and wouldn't get it again.
4/1/23, 2:16 PM - Tart! Some earthy, herbal, cherry notes on the nose and a medium finish.
8/11/21, 2:33 PM - Drank second bottle for wife's birthday. Acidity holding up nicely. Still bready with some almond notes.
12/20/20, 3:00 PM - More butter and vanilla with age!
11/14/20, 2:28 PM - Even better a year later!
8/15/18, 4:22 PM - July 2018 - similar profile, still enjoying this Rose.
8/15/18, 4:19 PM - July 2018- remains the same
8/15/18, 4:11 PM - July 2018 - similar
8/11/18, 12:54 PM - I'm using the levels set out by this site -http://support.cellartracker.com/article/49-tasting-notes-and-ratings"80-85 B Good70-79 C Below/Average"So yeah, I think it was fine.
2/16/17, 5:41 AM - Uh, no, I'm using the levels set out by this site. Let me help you out- http://support.cellartracker.com/article/49-tasting-notes-and-ratings"80-85 B Good70-79 C Below/Average"So a 79 is average to good. That is exactly what I think of the 2014 vintage, which is not as good as previous years from Arborbrook.
12/17/16, 9:11 PM - I have an academic tendency against A's for everyone :) Seriously though, I try to go off the suggested scale (http://support.cellartracker.com/article/49-tasting-notes-and-ratings)- in this case the wine was decent, but not great, so I went for an 80
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search