Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Tasting Notes for JVG

(1,030 notes on 953 wines)

1 - 50 of 1,030 Sort order
Red
3/23/2024 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep ruby color. Seductive nose of new leather, fresh and dried roses, cherry and raspberry fruit, vanilla bean, tobacco leaf, cinnamon, and pie crust. And faint woodsmoke. On the palate, still pretty bruising with aggressive tannin. Flavor profile leans toward dark chocolate, espresso, and sour cherry, but with some sweet spice and pie filling hiding underneath.

This is still quite forbidding, though it’s made progress since my first bottle about 11 years ago. I see some folks think it’s on the decline, but I’m still betting on improvement as the tannins continue to melt and the flavors keep developing. This bottle still has plenty of fruit to keep it going. I’m going to keep holding my last one.
White
3/9/2024 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Decent white burg for the price.
White
3/2/2024 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Tasty riesling, but it had less acidic bite than I would have liked, so the sweetness was a little heavy, especially for a kabinett.
2 people found this helpful Comment
White
2/26/2024 - JVG wrote:
No formal note. Reductive at first with strong struck-match aroma. Quickly blew off and turned into a rich wine with preserved lemon and some tropical fruit, creamy texture, and plenty of oak influence.
White
2/23/2024 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. A delicious Riesling that I think I would call a feinherb. Very nice cut and then some funky roundness and richness on the finish.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
12/17/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Very nice—medium bodied, lots of dill herbal American oak influence, juicy cherry fruit, tobacco, and supple tannin.
Red
10/15/2023 - JVG wrote:
Pretty restrained on the nose, just some black cherry fruit and dried rose petal. On the palate, medium bodied, with a peppery sharpness and more red fruit than dark. Not particularly structured, and little in the way of oak influence. Definitely a less ambitious approach, and nothing particularly expressive, but it has a freshness and clarity that elevate it above many cheap bottles.
White - Off-dry
10/14/2023 - JVG wrote:
Rich, aromatic nose of tropical fruits and flowers. Kiwi, melon, honey, honeysuckle. On the palate, a bit of oily petrol, lots of ripe tropical fruit, and honey again.
White - Sparkling
10/9/2023 - JVG wrote:
Can’t go wrong with this one, as usual.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White - Sparkling
9/24/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Delicious Chanpagne and great value.
Red
2001 Château Pontet-Canet Pauillac Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
9/24/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes, but this was fantastic. Elegant, still plenty of fruit, vanilla, violet, cedar. Medium bodied and delicious, dry, and clean classsy finish of minerals and menthol.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White - Fortified
9/24/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Usual oloroso magic. Nutty, caramel, rich, etc.
Red
9/24/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Young and still pretty closed. Cherry, underbrush, and smoke on the nose. Super tannic still on the palate. Hold.
White
9/22/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Completely delicious. Stony, sweet, citrusy, light and easy drinking—bottle goes quick.
2 people found this helpful Comment
Red
8/27/2023 - JVG wrote:
Medium-pale brick red color. On the nose, juicy red fruit aromas of cherry and strawberry, mixing with tobacco, smoke, cedar, and dried rose petals. On the palate, it's bright and lithe, with transparent fruit and a very floral and spicy kick. Very perfumed on the finish--its bouquet seems to hover in the air. Very elegant stuff.

Definitely stand this up and let it settle for a while before pouring. I did not, and my first glass had a lot of suspended pulp.
Rosé
8/5/2023 - JVG wrote:
Very floral on the nose, with fresh rose petals and honeysuckle mingling with juicy peach, apricot, and strawberry fruit. Medium bodied and quite acidic on the palate, making for a refreshing impression of just-ripe strawberries and pink lemon. Racier than your average Provençal rose and pretty straightforward, but delicious.
Red
6/30/2023 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep magenta color. On the nose, very floral, with a bouquet of violets, lavender, dried rose petals, and potpourri, alongside dark berry fruit aromas of blackberry and black raspberry. There is also some cinnamon spice, a hint of pipe smoke, and some outdoorsy notes of wet earth and foliage. With some air in the glass, there's also a bracing whiff of mint or eucalyptus. A very expressive and elegant nose. On the palate, it's more structured and masculine than I expected from the nose, and also funkier, with wet earth, mushroom, gamy meat, and smoke leading the way, built onto a solid scaffold of powdery, drying tannin. The fruit comes through on the finish, as does a distinct umami, soy-sauce kick. Medium bodied, good acidity and freshness, significant flavor intensity, and good length. This is Beaujolais operating at a high level, and is still on its way up. It's eloquent and enjoyable now, but I expect it to soften and have even more to say later on.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White
6/9/2023 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep lemon-gold color. Petrol, citrus, pineapple, kiwi, honey, and white summer flowers. Nicely balanced, only the slightest hint of sweetness, good intensity. Very nice.
Rosé
5/29/2023 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes, but this was not good, even for $10. Rough, thin, lacking in freshness and flavor. Just bad cheap wine.
White
4/30/2023 - JVG wrote:
Medium gold color. On the nose, preserved lemon, sweet peach and pear aromas, honey, and a bit of smoke and petrol. On the palate, delicious, tangerine, honey, peach, hugely intense, strong acid. Outstanding wine, will continue to develop and mature, outstanding value.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White - Sparkling
4/30/2023 - JVG wrote:
Not sure about disgorgement date, but I bought this bottle in 2013. No formal notes. Absolutely lovely and delicious. Chalky, floral, both fresh and rich. Intense, long. Fabulous.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White
2/15/2023 - JVG wrote:
Excellent as always.
Red
12/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
A nice inexpensive Bordeaux. With a lighter hand on the oak, it would have been even better.
Red
12/4/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep magenta color. Fruity, funky nose, medium bodied, nice combination of cherry fruit, graphite mineral, and savory, meaty flavors. Great balance. Good wine.
White
11/27/2022 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Crisp, bracing, tropical and citrus, mineral. Good.
White
6/10/2022 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes, but this was quite good. Herbal and a little savory to go along with the fruit. Some interest to it while still being easy-drinking.
Red
4/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
A nice easygoing Super Tuscan. One of the most blueberry-smelling wines I’ve encountered.
2 people found this helpful Comment
Red
3/24/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium ruby color. Very approachable and pleasant on the nose, with fresh red fruit aromas of cherry and raspberry, as well as rose petals and faint whiffs of cedar and smoke. Straightforward but enticing. On the palate, it's really very nice. Higher-toned profile, leaning toward raspberry fruit and floral flavors, with some graphite minerality and a sort of crushed-velvet texture—not shy with the tannins, but they are quite supple and plush. Very dry on the finish, but not astringent or bitter, as the fruit is very well balanced against the structure. Outstanding value for $13, and a master class in what humble Bordeaux can and should be.
Red
3/20/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep purplish-red color. On the nose, it's rather reticent, at least at first, with just a faint aroma of dark fruit—maybe blackberry—and then some baking spice and savory notes of smoke, charred meat, and black pepper. But the volume on everything is very low. Maybe a purple floral aspect, too, like blooming violets. On the palate, it is quite interesting. There's plenty of juicy dark berry fruit, which has a very primary but authentic intensity and freshness. Under that, savory and tangy flavors of barbecue, pepper, smoked meat, and a black tea herbal character. But really, right now it gives a simpler, more holistic impression of a characterful but forthright young red that would be great as an element of any number of meals, living up to good food without calling attention to itself. But I think it will become something more interesting with several more years in the bottle.
Red
2018 Fattoria Rodáno Chianti Classico Chianti Classico DOCG Sangiovese Blend, Sangiovese (view label images)
3/20/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium cherry red color. On the nose, it's rather reticent, which is not necessarily typical of my experience with Chianti from Rodano. Just a little bit of red fruit, a whiff of smoke, and a touch of new leather. On the palate, it is similarly straightforward and understated, with some pure cherry and raspberry fruit flavors, a touch of herbal character, and a dash of bitter espresso on the finish. Supple and medium-bodied, with moderate tannin. Definitely not the most impressive vintage from this producer, which I have always found to be reliable and overachieving for the price, but still a perfectly pleasant wine. Just more in the "house red" category than the more expressive wine I was expecting.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White - Sparkling
3/20/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium gold color with a moderate bead. On the nose, it shows its age with a dusty, even slightly musty character of old wood and family secrets. A bit of yeast and just a faint whiff of bruised apple. Not the most impressive or expressive nose. Much, much better on the palate as there is still a fresh blast of tart lemon fruit that immediately wakes up the tongue, and then the vinous depth of the wine begins to unfurl. First, there is a savory/umami sea-spray flavor that is reminiscent of manzanilla sherry, and then also a chalky, textbook Champagne mineral character. On the finish, the fruit becomes more ripe and rounded and combines with the oak and autolytic elements to give the impression of rich apple crumble, à la mode. It's still not the most complex Champagne, but it has real presence and intensity of flavor.

I chose this bottle to mark my 1,000th tasting note, and I was worried after nosing it that it would be a letdown for the occasion, but in the end, it turned out to be a lovely Champagne and a delicious way to celebrate.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White - Sparkling
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium gold color, with an energetic, copious bead. On the nose, it is surprisingly perfumed, with the first impression being that of spring flowers in bloom. Beneath that, the autolytic notes of puff pastry and yeast are nicely set off by a flintsmoke mineral aspect. Not much in the way of fruit aromas except perhaps a bit of lemon peel. On the palate, it has a very racy, lean style: high acid, restrained dosage, citrus fruit, flinty mineral backbone. To be honest, I think this compares pretty well to the standard NV cuvée of its parent Champagne house, which is certainly not something you can say for every house's California outpost. I would find it difficult to justify paying more than double for the "real thing" in this case. Which ultimately makes this an impressive effort and a good value.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium reddish purple color. On the nose, it's very primary, dominated by juicy cherry and blackberry aromas, as well as some cinnamon and peppery spice. Also a bit of sweet violet floral perfume. On the palate, it's really nice, with an elegant dustiness if that makes any sense. Apart from that, it's mostly juicy red fruit and a bit of chocolate. Medium bodied, very gentle tanning. Straightforward, uncomplicated, and tasty.
Red
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium brick-red color. On the nose, it's quite perfumed and sweet, with notes of cinnamon spice, dried rose petals, fresh-baked pie crust, vanilla bean, and applewood smoke. Also some herbal character that is more difficult to pin down. There is still from ripe cherry fruit aroma, but it is secondary to the flowers and spice. With air, there is something more earthy and phenolic, like burning moss and pine needles. On the palate, the character changes quite a bit. Instead of the floral, spicy sweetness, it is immediately masculine, brooding, even a bit standoffish. Still very tannic, and the tannins combine with the woody flavors to make for quite a drying, slightly bitter impression. There is a tart blast of sour cherry that comes out mostly on the finish, along with an emergence of the floral flavors. As it breathes and—more importantly—as your mouth adjusts to the tannic assault, more nuance begins to show through, and the fruit creeps into the midpalate, making for a more balanced, pleasurable experience.

At first, I was quite disappointed as it seemed like I had waited too long on this bottle and that it was all sharp elbows. And I still don't know whether it will get better or worse with additional age, but I did like it quite a bit more after spending some time with it. But it puts up a fight!
Orange
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Bright copper color. Absolutely breathtaking on the nose, and very difficult to describe. The fruit aromas are very natural and fresh, like just-ripe raspberries and strawberries. But more dominant are the floral and herbal/woodsy notes, which make it like sticking your nose into a garden in a glass, on a warm summer day. there's earth and leaves and tree bark and all kinds of blooming flowers, as well as a spicy, polleny aspect that would strike fear in the heart of an allergic. On top of that, a yeasty note that mingles with the fruit in a similar way as in a lambic beer. But then there is something savory as well that I'm having a hard time pinning down. The way it intertwines with the sweetness of the fruit makes me think of something like grilled pineapple on a burger, or Hawaiian pizza. And then a crowning note of something old and dusty and rich, like an ancient leather-bound book. It's really a spectacular and exhilarating bouquet.

It's every bit as good on the palate, if not better. The juiciness of the bruit is a delicious shock, backed up with lots of refreshing acidity—like the freshest just-ripe strawberries and the juiciest tangerine. But again, the fruit is just the tip of the iceberg, and is lifted by heady, perfumed flavors of rosewater, thyme, and who knows what other flowers and herbs, which waft up the nose after you swallow each mouthful and seem to hang in the air before you. And then it gains depth from the earthy, yeasty flavors and the aged vinousness. The overall intensity of flavor in this wine is really just dumbfounding. Endless finish.

I don't have much experience with these wines, so I don't know how this was when it was younger and how much of my experience is due to the bottle's age. But this is an absolutely heart-stopping wine, and I will be seeking out more from Radikon—for drinking early, late, and in between.
White - Fortified
N.V. Equipo Navazos La Bota de Manzanilla Pasada 30 1/15 Manzanilla de Sanlúcar de Barrameda Palomino Fino (view label images)
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium caramel gold color. Lovely, rich nose of toffee, salted caramel, buttered toast, olive, seaweed, miso, smoke, toasted walnuts, and iodine. The combination of obvious age in the solera and then a decade in the bottle has definitely brought this manzanilla pasado closer to an amontillado than a manzanilla. On the palate, it's an absolute knockout. The intensity of flavor is off the charts, with some of its youthful vigor still peeking out with preserved lemon and lime freshness from beneath a luxuriously sweet and savory mixture of all the same notes as on the nose. But it shows such remarkable balance, and also life and vigor on the tongue, with its medium-full body lifted up and energized with just the right amount of acid, and its most prominent flavors elevated by the smoky, dusty, old-leather depth above which they float. And then the finish, with a huge dose of sherry's signature nutty, umami wave, is overwhelmingly powerful yet supple and refined, and it goes on and on and on and on.

I'm drinking this on December 30, and even though it's barely sneaking in under the wire, this might well be my wine of the year. I'm sure that this was intended to be drunk sooner than this, and I'm certainly curious about what this was like when first bottled, but I'm not at all regretful about holding onto it as long as I did. This is profound wine that stops you in your tracks. I paid $45 for this bottle, but it is worth three times that by comparison with other other styles of wine from other, more in-demand parts of the wine world. Stunning.
Red
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep purplish red color. On the nose, lot's of ripe dark fruit aromas, as well as some sweet oaky spice and a faint rubbery reductive note. On the palate, the fruit is brighter and redder than I expected, with a fair amount of raspberry and cherry mingling with the darker blackberry flavors. The texture is also more supple and lithe than I expected, with a silken medium weight. but the oak is too heavy-handed, and it particularly mars the finish, which turns somewhat bitter and wooden. It's really too bad because this is otherwise a very nice bottle of affordable yet classy Bordeaux.
White - Sparkling
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
No disgorgement date listed, but I bought this bottle in October 2013, so it's not a spring chicken.

medium gold color, with quite an energetic bead. On the nose, the fruit aromas are of bruised apple and pear, perhaps revealing the time in bottle. But there's also something more tropical—guava, maybe, or perhaps a whiff of pineapple? Then there is some almond and cinnamon/nutmeg baking spice. With some air, the bouquet is actually quite luscious and sweet, which is interesting for a Champagne with no dosage that I expect to be bone dry and very acidic.

On the palate, it is indeed a bit of a different story, with the fruit shifting to a more citrus profile of lemon and lime and maybe even a bit of grapefruit. But there's still some of the pineapple richness too, as well as some nuttiness—though less of the spice. It does also have an element of greenness, with a stemmy or leafy note adding a sort of earthy side to the finish. But it doesn't come off as being underripe or punishing. And in fact, the acid doesn't really jump out at me any more than with a regular Brut. The lack of dosage just changes it into a more athletic, angular wine. But it's still well balanced, and was clearly expertly made with excellent fruit.

I probably waited too long to open this, but it's still drinking very well. I wouldn't say it's truly worth the high price, but Champagne is what it is, so you either pay or you don't drink any.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
2/17/2022 - JVG wrote:
Medium plum-skin color. On the nose, it's ripe and dark-fruited, with sweet aromas of blackberry jam and blueberry muffin. There is also a smoky aspect and a slight cedar woodiness. With some air, it reveals a faint whiff of charred meat. it hits the palate with surprising intensity, and instead of the rather luscious impression to the fruit on the nose, you get a mouthful of delicious but very tart berried. The tannins are modest but drying and a bit astringent, in a pleasant way, and pair nicely with some anise/licorice character. And then on the finish, there's a quite powerful blast of black pepper, and even some red pepper, that prickles the tongue and throat.

A very interesting and compelling wine. Not complex, but lots of character, if that makes sense. Focused, direct, and intense—and very enjoyable.
White
2/7/2022 - JVG wrote:
Pale lemon color. On the nose, a nice combination of lemon, lime, and pineapple citrus with sweeter peach and pear aromas. Also a bit of new rubber and petrol, and gunsmoke. So far so good. On the palate, it’s delicious if a bit sweet for a Kabinett in my opinion. But the fruit has good intensity and the lemony citrus still bites through the RS, making for a nice contrast of roundness and spine. The mineral and smoky aspect is still present too, especially on the finish. Overall a good wine with enough going on to hold one’s interest, and a great value.
Red
1/8/2022 - JVG wrote:
Pretty dreadful stuff, encased in one of the most obnoxiously overthick, overheavy bottles I’ve ever come across. Overripe, alcoholic grape juice.
Red
11/25/2021 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes, but no complaints at Thanksgiving.
White - Sparkling
N.V. Ferrari Brut Trento Champagne Blend (view label images)
11/8/2021 - JVG wrote:
No formal notes. Not bad—more herbal and chalky than I remember from previous bottles. Slightly coarse on the mouse.
Red
10/29/2021 - JVG wrote:
textbook brick-red color. Sweet and perfumed on the nose, with raspberry and cherry fruit aromas and violet floral lift. Despite the color, it does not testify to its 15 years in the bottle on the nose. Also not very complex in its bouquet, though it is certainly pleasant and inviting. With some air in the glass, there is a bit of a savory, smoked meat note that emerges and adds a welcome bit of contrast. On the palate, it also comes across as still quite young, with powerful, mouth-coating, drying tannins. The flavor profile pretty closely mirrors the bouquet, except that the sweet fruit aromas have become more tart fruit flavors. But there is also some earthy, mushroomy depth, which I like.

overall, perhaps a bit of a disappointment because of my expectations for something compelling from a 15-year-old Barolo.
1 person found this helpful Comments (1)
White
10/23/2021 - JVG wrote:
Medium lemon-gold color. On the nose, it's a bit reductive at first, with some rubbery, smoky notes to go along with a definite flinty, gunpowder characteristic. That's really the dominant bouquet, at least when first poured. There's maybe a very faint floral aspect underneath, and a hint of lemon, but you really have to go looking.

The more I swirl it and let it breathe, I am starting to get a savory, rich, toasted element that I really like—some combination of oak and maybe a bit of age. And now there's something sweet, like vanilla ice cream or fresh whipped cream. So it's definitely worth sticking with the nose after the initial burst of smoke. There's more in there.

On the palate, the pedigree is obvious right away. Obviously excellent winemaking in the combination of luxurious oak and high-acid flinty Chablis character. It makes for a very generous yet appetizing experience, well suited for many types of food yet also enjoyable and rewarding on its own. It's really not a wine that impresses with its complexity or expressiveness, but rather with perfect harmony and understated class. And the little kiss of toasted, refined oaky sweet-and-savory character on the finish is wonderful.

I think it might be a little better in a few years, but I don't think it's one to keep for decades and hope for an expression of mature genius.
Rosé - Sparkling
10/23/2021 - JVG wrote:
Beautiful burnished gold color, with a bit of a rosy copper glow. On the nose, it smells of old things: bruised apple, moldering underbrush (in a good way), old leather, old wood, old libraries. It's not complex, but it has a nobility of bearing. With some air in the glass, there is also an evocative whiff of lemon-iced cookie—perhaps a glimpse back in time to its youth? On the palate, it's similarly obviously aged, with very modest remaining mousse, and just a suggestion of apple fruit lingering. But again there is an elegance and refinement to its simplicity, with a straight-backed, disciplined posture in its acidic structure and a chalky bitterness amplified by a rich hint of almond liqueur.

it's obvious that I've held this bottle of NV longer than the producer intended (no disgorgement date is provided, but I bought this bottle in January 2014). But it's a testament to the winemaking and the quality of the grapes that it has evolved into something different and compelling in this "off-label use," as it were.
White
10/23/2021 - JVG wrote:
Pale lemon color. Reserved on the nose, with some lemon citrus fruit, as well as a bit of more tropical, melon aroma. There's also a faint whiff of smokiness. On the palate, the fruit leans more toward apple and pear, though it still has a nice spine of acidity. It's a nice balance of RS and acid, which is a good thing because the structure ends up being the best part of the wine. The flavor complexity and intensity is not much to write home about. A tasty guzzler, essentially.
Red
10/23/2021 - JVG wrote:
Medium-deep, halfway between ruby and garnet color. On the nose it's simultaneously opulent and elegant, showy but refined—like a rococo old opera house in which over-the-top flourishes and intricate filigree have taken on a dignified character by virtue of age. There's still a little bit of dark, spicy blackberry fruit, and some rich, tasty pie-crust primary oak character, but those notes are overmatched by successive waves of secondary and tertiary characteristics: smoke, cedar, tree bark, dill, olives, barbecue, dried rose petals, black licorice, dark chocolate, old barrels, old books, old leather, coffee grounds, mushrooms, and soy sauce.

On the palate, you sense the high alcohol right away, with an immediate warming heat, but it actually doesn't present as remarkably heavy—more of a medium-heavy weight. The tannins are of medium strength, but they have really melted into an elegant, fine-grained texture, somewhere between silk and satin. The flavor profile is a little bit less complex than on the nose, and the oak is a bit more directly obvious, but there is still a nice balance between deep fruit and spicy/earthy/meaty/herbal flavors. And the intensity it prodigious.

Definitely a more dignified and less rumbustious wine than when I last drank a bottle, which still retains its power and scale. Lots of fun to drink, and wish I had more to see where it will go next.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
10/23/2021 - JVG wrote:
Medium-bright ruby red color, with a hint of purple. On the nose, the fruit is very high-toned and bright—cranberries and raspberries. There is also a distinctly green character of stems and leafiness. That's pretty much it, apart from maybe a faint sweet, perfumed floral note. On the palate, it's more interesting to me. It's still quite green, with fruit flavors of underripe or barely ripe red berries. But the stemmy character from the nose makes more of an herbal, woodsy impression that I find evocative and pleasant. The tannin is moderate and it has a nice satiny texture, and I wouldn't say it is hugely acidic or offputtingly tart as I feared it might be. A bit astringent on the finish, but even that seems in keeping with the character of the wine.

Definitely an unusual one, but I ended up enjoying it.
1 - 50 of 1,030
More results
  • Tasting Notes: 1,030 notes on 953 wines
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close