6/14/19, 8:38 AM - That must explain it. I much prefer the marsanne/roussanne blends of the northern rhone to assemblages of grenache, clairette that I suppose are more common further south...
12/29/18, 1:42 AM - Yes, it's ready to go. It was only with the truffles that more tertiary aromas would have been welcome.
8/12/17, 9:47 AM - Thanks for the correction. My info came from a young guy in a wine bar in Lyon. Not sure if the other info was correct - apologies cellartracker!
7/4/16, 4:13 AM - I'm sure it would have been fine after a long decant...
9/7/15, 11:22 PM - Haha! It's more likely to get categorized as "for unsuspecting guests"
9/8/15, 9:00 AM - Thanks for the tips! I like peaty whiskies and in the past I've enjoyed Lagavulin and Bowmore, but have found Arbeg a bit much. As this one was so well reviewed, I thought I'd give it a go, but it's clearly not really for me. Looking through the comments, someone else clearly had a similar experience, so I guess it may be a touch divisive, stylistically.
9/8/15, 11:47 PM - Thanks! I'll look into them
9/10/15, 2:03 PM - Had another glass last night, following on from a balvenie triple cask 12 year old, and enjoyed it. It's very powerful, but to say that it lacks subtlely is not true. That said, it definitely needs to be drunk in moderation.
9/11/15, 12:11 AM - Yes, cheers! I wonder how much of that Laphroaig were you drinking ;)
9/11/15, 4:58 AM - Great, thanks. And no worries for writing so much. Maybe I'll check out the triple wood. I paid 62 euros for the Uigedaeil, which seems to be cheaper than most online retailers.
2/15/15, 4:15 AM - Definitely not bottle variation - I just overrated it the first time round. It's not a bad wine by any means; it's quite nice even. But there are southern French wines in this price bracket that have a lot more going on (Gardies, Mas Champart, Vignes oubliées...).
1/31/14, 3:09 AM - This surprises me. I've never find Chezeaux's wines oaky. I had the 09 rue de chaux, as well as the 08 and 10 suchots and I wasn't really aware of any obtrusive presence of oak in any of them.
7/22/13, 5:20 AM - I'm not quite sure what you don't agree with. I would agree with you that it's a nice, complex wine that is ready to drink. I was just pointing out something that a lot of people think (e.g., the guys at my local wine shop, the Revue de Vin de France, Michel Rolland): that Daumas Gassac not only lacks a regional identity (being a BDX blend), but that it has been outclassed by other wines of the south of France, particularly those in Roussillon (Gauby, Mas Jullien, etc.), which are more interesting both in themselves and as expressions of terroir. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this 2000, I just wouldn't buy more recent vintages.
6/27/13, 9:00 AM - It is a $16 wine, no? That's what it cost shortly after release in France.
6/28/13, 12:25 AM - Why speculate on the first growths when Rolland de By can provide a capital return of 50%? Just kidding.
4/17/13, 3:05 AM - Why only 74?
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search