4/26/23, 2:17 PM - Appreciate your comment. The corks were pulled about 6 hours ahead of tasting, and we monitored the wines in the glass for another ~3 hours, thanks.
8/16/22, 10:53 PM - Can’t really say, Rich, as it was first encounter, but one would think 7 years is enough at least to flash something, I fear…
7/4/22, 4:25 AM - Thank you for checking in on this icon, a rare birthyear success in my case. Can I ask please about your bottle prep?Thanks in advance,Jonathan
11/11/21, 4:31 PM - Thanks for the comments, folks. I can relay that this bottle had a 10-hour decant. The person who brought it is intimately familiar with the producer. FWIW, his comments were marginally more optimistic than mine -- here's hoping...Happy drinking,JonnyG
11/11/21, 4:58 PM - I'll be rooting for you, both. Here's to more good times and better bottles. Cheers
10/15/21, 7:12 PM - Thank you so much for calling my attention to a major error in the TN I had posted for this note and just deleted, for which I take full responsibility: the wine I had was a Verduno Monvig., not Burlotto, so sorry. Thanks again!
4/30/21, 11:18 AM - Thank you for inquiring, Sared. A winemaker friend was the generous contributor of the bottle, and took a portion to his lab the next morning to test alcohol, sugar and other metrics!
4/16/21, 7:20 AM - Great point, thank you. PNP restaurant service. Well done.
2/13/21, 7:20 AM - I suspect storage over the decades accounts for the underperformance, Mr. _Cat. California is a lot farther from Piemonte than you are, regrettably! Thank you for commenting.
10/16/20, 1:57 PM - Mark, this was slow-ox'ed for about 6 hours, thanks for your interest.
6/19/20, 6:36 AM - Dear Burgnick,From scanning your wonderful TNs, I think you may have meant to say that this beat the Petrus (?).Kind regards,Jonathan
5/18/20, 1:42 PM - Thanks for the comment. It took 2-3 hours, from memory, to reach peak, but I wouldn't worry so much about being able to time it perfectly -- just uncork on an evening when you have time to follow the evolution patiently (and be sure to report back).Jonathan
1/12/20, 7:46 PM - A little short on the finish? (Sorry if too soon, couldn’t resist...)
11/21/19, 10:16 PM - Thank you for the query. Food took a backseat for sure. I would be reluctant to risk impacting your Chave with anything not extremely neutral, but maybe try something like a chicken paillard or mild cassoulet? And post the results, please — good luck!
7/21/19, 12:01 PM - Inspiring indeed, thanks!
7/19/19, 11:27 AM - Entirely possible, Mark, though it was purchased just before the tasting from a reputable local retailer. Hope I encounter another one soon, would know better in that case!
4/2/19, 5:29 AM - A much appreciated note as I’m a fan of Jonata, especially with age. Just wanted to call to your attention that Jonata and its vineyards are located in the Santa Ynez Valley wine district, specifically the Ballard AVA, some 90 or so miles from Paso Robles, which may account for some of the differences you perceived. Jonata’s are amongst the best expressions of Bordeaux varietals on the Central Coast IMO. You can also look for reds from the Happy Canyon appellation, which generally gets warmer and is well suited to Cabernet, not that Jonata is easily topped. Cheers!
4/2/19, 2:37 PM - My pleasure. Don't miss Jonata's "Alma" (Cab. Franc) bottling. I just had an awesome 2009. Apart from that, the region's best BDX would include the reserve bottlings from producers like Dierberg and Brander, though they may be hard to fine. Crown Point is an interesting, high-scoring effort with a great team behind it -- not for the oak-averse. Barrack Family Piocho is a very good value.
3/26/19, 12:58 PM - Thanks for the flattery, Sir 1949, but I assure my expertise is highly overrated. For what it's worth, and I don't think you can go wrong here, I would go for the Paleo Rosso this time and save the Taurasi. Give whichever one you choose plenty of air, post your notes and most importantly: enjoy these momentous occasions. Best wishes!Jonathan
2/22/19, 10:25 AM - No decant, no need for one in my view -- enjoy!
4/7/18, 8:50 AM - One of my ultra-faves, but have been concerned it was starting a not-so-slow decline, whereas you clearly see otherwise. Were your bottles bought on release, whereas mine were picked up along the way?
2/7/18, 10:55 AM - Pinot? (just askin', as they say...)Jonathan
1/31/18, 10:08 AM - Thanks so much for the update. Possible in your view that it’s entered a (temporary) dumb phase, pls?Jonathan
12/16/17, 8:28 AM - Much appreciated, albeit a bit painful to read for someone who's long this wine. Any chance this has something going on like some of the '96's (Latour, e.g.) such that time will cure all ails, eventually...?
12/16/17, 8:41 AM - Mine are recent acquisitions, a magnum and 6-pack. Being in SoCal myself, and long a pretty deep vertical of the producer, I'd be thrilled to lean in and help taste alongside you, the proof being in the pudding, eh?!
12/17/17, 8:27 AM - Not offhand but I am happy to over-contribute as a newcomer yet to prove his bona fides :)In addition to the '82, I can draw from 1966, 1978, 1981 (hardly a good vintage), 1988, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2005 and 2009. 2000 and younger presumably would need a serious aeration to show well.Thanks much
10/30/17, 7:53 PM - Hi, thank you for the query. You’re in a prime window now in my view, ideally with air. I think this has 12+ years ahead of it, so I likely would give the same answer for 2020. Enjoy, and post your results please!Jonathan
10/28/17, 6:32 AM - Cam, can you please elaborate on your "drink up" comment? CT drinking window is 2018-2045 and Steve Tanzer says it won't peak until 2023 or so, with no rush thereafter...Thanks as always!Jonathan
12/27/16, 8:57 PM - My heartiest of congratulations on a monumental 10,000th note -- well done, but no slowing down, please: you're a young man and can triple this with ease, something to which I look forward!
9/23/16, 9:41 PM - Hardly overreacting. In fact, I struggled a lot with this tasting note. Should I disregard all the adulation for this scarce and coveted newcomer wine, or also try to convey the notion that while of high-quality, it in my opinion should be classified squarely within the range of other high-quality Syrah from accomplished producers taking fruit from the same, or similar, sources? Irrespective, I would not scored below 92. Looking at my tasting notes history, I have given three California Syrah scores above 93: Sine Qua Non Ode to E, Alban Reva, Donelan and a fairly rare Zach Mesa Bear Block. 92-93 scores were given to quality cuvées from all of the above producers, as well as the liks of Herman Story, Qupe, Piedrasassi and Stolpman. I feel like Andremilly belongs in this latter group, at least on this night thanks very much for the inquiry, and for making me clarify things (at least I hope so!).
9/23/16, 10:12 AM - I feel you, wineotim!
9/11/16, 4:45 PM - Sorry, don't recall stemware given the passage of time, but doubt we changed midstream. Cheers!
7/16/16, 10:59 AM - Thank you for the (series of) helpful Hosanna TNs -- just wondering if the reference to 2008 in the text is erroneous, as you seem to be comparing this to another vintage?Best,JG
5/24/16, 8:26 PM - I commiserate, vintage1949, no worries! Why not try a long decant? Let me know what you decide in any case, thanks.
1/11/16, 2:31 PM - Congratulations to you. What a great memory you have created with your bride!Jonathan
12/24/15, 7:05 AM - While I can't imagine this getting any better, I suspect there are at least fifteen more years left of prime drinking!
11/8/15, 11:49 AM - Panos, I always appreciate your detailed, focused notes. One query on this one, please: I think you have the 2004 a 91, yet seem to prefer it over the 2003, which you gave 92 points -- am I missing an updated note on the 2004?Appreciatively,Jonathan
10/12/15, 6:56 AM - An especially fine 500th tasting note, much appreciated, congrats!
8/25/15, 11:46 AM - Very helpful, sir, as with virtually all of your notes, but I humbly alert you to the two key parts of the last sentence being inverted if I am not mistaken. Thanks so much for the hard work. Cheers
7/15/15, 10:38 AM - Hi, Buzzzz... this was available on an airplane so I wasn't about to pass in the hopes it would come my way again (!) -- that said, it was barely entering that drinkable phase: nothing wrong with opening it so soon, but honestly, why bother?!Cheers,JG
6/18/15, 9:11 PM - B-off, great to hear from you. I have to profess that this is only my second experience with the cuvée, but if you put me on truth serum I would wonder whether the CT drinking window isn't too long, rather than the other way around. Cheers!
6/18/15, 3:22 PM - You make an excellent point, BDC, thank you for your input.
5/22/15, 3:16 PM - Centvins, you may not how right you are -- below my 95 point rating for the '01: "Popped & poured by a keen eyed guest who spied it in the rack and "needed it" with the steak, I was blown away by the depth and complexity of this wine, the first of my 2001's I've opened. The reviews are much more mixed than I'd expect, but I found this to be gracious, complex and very, very rewarding. Dark red in color with a barnyard nose: leather, pepper, garrique, herbs -- dirty. Silky textured waves of earthy flavors and that Mourvedre texture in the mouth. Long, satisfying finish. Can you discern that I loved this?" Many thanks!
5/7/15, 5:41 PM - Thx, JimN: one man's violets are another's violence it seems, hah! I think I will leave this unedited, for posterity's sake.
3/1/15, 7:52 PM - How odd, Lipsman. I seem to recall seeing it listed on the bottle, cannot be sure of course. I mentioned it to Elisabetta and had the impression she agreed (could have just been that she was being polite). I double-checked Galloni's review and he, too, mentions Syrah. In any case, thank you for taking the time to comment. All the best!
3/1/15, 8:30 PM - Jeff, you piqued my curiosity! A quick Google search took me to K&L's website, which attributed this gem to Galloni of all people: "The 2004 is the first Saffredi in which Alicante was replaced with Syrah." I've edited the review and, presumptuously but hope you don't mind, credited you, with appreciation.
2/25/15, 11:20 PM - Great point, thanks: surprising relative to my expectations from past bottles (no notes on CT). I appreciate the nudge and will clarify the review.
10/17/14, 3:50 PM - Thank you, Dan. I look forward to your notes too.
10/16/14, 2:08 PM - no thanks, Josh -- wasn't my bottle -- but I appreciate the query
5/26/14, 8:30 AM - any thoughts on ideal drinking windows please?
5/12/14, 4:44 PM - Timely question, Seth, as I just returned from my first taste of the 2002 Salon. The Salon is far lighter, almost ethereal though hardly lacking in substance. I will score it higher when I come to and post notes. Thanks for the comment,Jonathan
4/18/14, 8:35 AM - Hola, Cam. I love the salinity of this wine. It can transport me (though I've never been to Santorini). The "cheesy" comment threw me, though. Care to elaborate? Hoping to see you in June,JG
3/28/14, 5:44 PM - Salil, any reason to wait on these and hope for improvement in your view, please?JG
3/2/14, 4:40 PM - Stefan, I wish I could be sure be we were guests and the host presented the bottle without any context. I'm awfully glad you enjoyed yours, surely a wondrous chateau when on its game. Cheers!
2/14/14, 5:57 PM - Love this bottle, though I believe (in reference to your comment) that it's only about 1/3 Mourvedre...Cheers!Jonathan
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search