Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Comments on my notes

(7 comments on 7 notes)

1 - 7 of 7 Sort order
Red
2020 Domaine G. Roumier / Christophe Roumier Chambolle-Musigny Pinot Noir
3/25/2024 - Sepsis wrote:
92 points
Nice vintage for this wine.
Has the stuffing to go for decades.
  • Sepsis commented:

    4/14/24, 12:26 PM - Just PnP. But no problem putting it in af decanter.
    Enjoy

White - Sparkling
2012 Roses de Jeanne / Cédric Bouchard Champagne Blanc de Noirs La Presle Pinot Noir
10/9/2020 - Sepsis wrote:
90 points
Nice champagne, but disappointing when looking at the label.
Too evolved and strangely sweet.
Backside of otherwise great 2012?
  • Sepsis commented:

    3/1/21, 2:11 AM - Lets hope so!
    I am a big fan of C. Bouchard so even more disappointing

Red
2015 Tenuta delle Terre Nere Etna Rosso Santo Spirito Etna DOC Nerello Blend, Nerello Mascalese
6/16/2020 - pigdaddy wrote:
90 points
decanted one hour. stylish & elegant, in the early stage of expressing it's destination; still learning these Etna reds, whether they will evolve, into what?, this one is showing nicely, balanced between fruit, soil, mineral w/tannins underplayed & acids in check; hard not to like at the table.

crispy skin pan-roasted chicken thighs, 1st of the season, picked this morning chanterelles in a creamy little stew w/capers & ham; roasted broccoli w/spring onions & Calabrian chilies
  • Sepsis commented:

    8/22/20, 8:22 AM - My experience is that they evolve very much like great Nebbiolo. At least terre nere wines.
    Had a prefylloxera 2010 not too long ago which was absolutely gorgeous.
    Cheers

Red
2010 La Pèira en Damaisèla Terrasses du Larzac Las Flors de La Pèira Red Rhone Blend
5/12/2016 - Puteljen! wrote:
86 points
The 2010 Las Flors de la Peira did not impress me as much as last time. It worked fairly well with food but I struggled to finish my glass after dinner. There was just a bit too much jam, tobacco and vanilla to maintain balance. Too bad, since the quality of the fruit is really good. A little more restraint and this would have been great. I do find tonights showing a bit strange considering my last bottle (in 2013) felt really well balanced but I could detect nothing wrong with the wine. Perhaps it was still off in some way or perhaps my palate has shifted further towards lighter wines.
  • Sepsis commented:

    5/23/16, 9:44 AM - Great TN
    Have had excactly the same experience as you.
    Had it in autumn 2014 and loved it. Tonight it was as you wrote. Maybe in a odd place right now. Will save the last one and my 2011 a few years. Cheers:-)

Red
2010 Fiorenzo Nada Barbaresco Manzola Nebbiolo
4/3/2015 - NostraBacchus Likes this wine:
93 points
First slightly muted, opens up with some time in the glass. High-pitch notes of red berries, a lot of minerality, some flowers, some sweet spices. It's still very primary right now but very promising. On the palate there are notes of red fruit again, some tobacco, a lot of minerality and some spices. It's medium-bodied but dense, with medium+ tannin and medium+ acidity providing structure and freshness. Good length. When popped and poured it tasted a little light, but it put on significant weight and density with some air. So from that perspective I think it would make sense to wait 3-5 more years until it put on some more weight and additional complexity. It's already very pretty right now though.... so pace yourself. (93+)
  • Sepsis commented:

    1/26/16, 10:32 AM - Thanks for a great TN. Had it tonight and agree with everything you write. Will save the rest a couple of years:-)

Red
2010 Fiorenzo Nada Barbaresco Nebbiolo
4/5/2015 - Sepsis Likes this wine:
92 points
This is a wonderful offering from the truly great Nada Fiorenzo.
It is very young, but already very drinkable. Lots of air opens it perfectly. Two hours of decanting and drunk over several hours it just keeps opening with voluptuous dark fruit and herbal balsamic notes.
Firm,cool, clean, deep dark fruit and a weightlessness as the usual NF signature.
If the house is unfamiliar - this is the place to start.
  • Sepsis commented:

    10/6/15, 10:24 PM - They are both Wonderful. The 2011 Being more accessible and drinking better as of today. 2010 was a classic vintage in piedmont and most of the barbaresco and Barolo are reticent at this point.
    You can easily drink the 2010 now but it will gain from proper cellaring. Hope it helps you:-)
    Cheers

Red
2006 Comm. G.B. Burlotto Barolo Acclivi Nebbiolo
11/1/2014 - Barnaby33 wrote:
Even a month later the memory remains though not in a good way. I love this producer but this wine was a tannic rock. Hopefully in 5 years it will open up but dear sweet jeebus it was unforgiving. Seriously hard, tannic, fruit gone somewhere north for the winter. Reading other tasting notes it's like we were all drinking different wines.
  • Sepsis commented:

    3/23/15, 3:43 PM - Had exactly the same experience tonight. Hoping the other will better tomorrow. Afraid this vintage just went wrong?

1 - 7 of 7
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close