2/16/14, 9:58 AM - I find Lopez de Heredia to be a better hacienda.
2/16/14, 8:20 PM - And ofcourse La Rioja Alta Gran Reserva 904 and the CVNE s.
3/21/13, 3:26 AM - if a wine can't last even 1 day after consuming 1/3 of the bottle, followed by vacuvin, then it will not last 10 years. I did not take many notes after consuming this plonk (just enough to remind me not to buy it again), but suspect that it lacks tannin. 87 was a polite score for day 1. 80 was a too kind score for day 2. Poured it down the drain. Bordeaux produces many fine wines, but also continues to gush wines that are not fit to drink. This is one of them. Now this could be a bottle variation issue (inferior batch), but then this speaks to quality control. Not interested in pursuing this anyway. Wil not buy more. Lots of other choices.
3/10/13, 4:11 AM - Sorry, I wish I could recall, but I can't. Do not have better notes. Based on my note and the fact that the wine is young, suggest you air the bottle for say 4 hours, decant 2 hours in advance, but taste test after 1 hour and rebottle and vacuvin seal if and when necessary.
3/13/13, 4:11 PM - What restaurant?I'd be pleased to drop by and handle the decanting and taste testing for you. :)Or even dine and order this bottle, if the markups aren't silly. :) :)Do you allow BYOB?
2/23/13, 11:06 AM - Yes, there are many decent wines that others may like that are just not my cup of tea. I do like Dunn, just not this particular bottle. I tasted it at a retailers tasting bar, so it could have degenerated at the bar (despite the argon) or it just could be this bottle or perhaps it is this vintage. I did not (at the time) feel the wine warranted a below 90 score. Maybe I did not want to give a Dunn a below 90. Perhaps I should have.Fyi, I recently tasted a bottle of Chimney Rock that was just plonk and scored it accordingly. It wasn't a "bad" bottle in the "off" sense of the word. Could have been a bad batch or year or yes well a bad wine. Fyi, I have had good bottles of Chimney Rock (albeit a different wine and year). Anyway, I received a very negative comment from a member. How dare I rate this bottle so low. Well, you can only judge a wine by the bottle (or bottles) that you open. and call a spade a spade, based on your personal experience.But I am beginning to detect abit of bias in this community towards California wines, and sensitivity when we don't score California icons well. Well, I have no compunction about scoring any wine poorly (I've had Lafites that were undrinkable now due to excess tanin and thereby scored them low). CheersJhcolman
2/23/13, 11:47 AM - Valid point. Will rescore.
1/26/13, 6:05 PM - No, just middling wine with excess tannin. Bad batch perhaps. But not drinkable. Sorry, plonk is plonk.
1/8/12, 8:43 AM - Suggest that you post these types of notes as private notes. Not useful as public tasting notes.
11/18/10, 7:18 PM - Hi Dave: I guess I openned a bad bottle. See my posting note. I gave the one I openned and the other two I bought back to the LCBO. Hope to see you at the next Toronto Wine Cru tasting, if not sooner. PS Are you attending any of the tasting events at this weekends gourmet food and wine show? If so, when? I'll be attending the "Hollywood Reds" and "Burgundy the Legend" tastings. Cheers. Julian.
8/2/10, 2:06 PM - I thought this was a red wine? So says my local wine store and other CT postings. White peach? Loquats?
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search