3/13/24, 4:47 AM - Røde viner fra Loire har hatt godt av den globale oppvarmingen, og har rykket opp på min liste over interessante vinområder. 2021 var et mer normalt år, og ga oss dessverre i overkant skrinne viner. Før var år som dette mer normale, men fruktfylden har gitt disse vinene på Cabernet Franc mer harmoniske.
12/27/23, 10:40 AM - Outstanding, as you will see from my note, in relation to the price. Not outstanding as such. The price is very moderate.
3/15/23, 6:57 AM - Det er også min erfaring. En vin som er svært anvendelig, særlig til Tapas. Den flyr under radaren for vinpressen, virker det som, men hver gang jeg smaker den tenker jeg at den må jeg oftere ha på bordet.
2/9/23, 2:21 AM - Jeg drakk også denne nylig. Den forrige flasken, for noen år siden, var veldig trang og kantete. Dette var flotte saker. Omtalt på bloggen min (olemski.blogspot), Kjellerviner i januar del I.
12/2/22, 1:57 AM - Jeg har smakt mye Grand Cru Chablis de siste 25 årene, og Blanchot kan jeg aldri huske har innfridd forventningene til en Grand Cru. Det er også lenge siden jeg har smakt en riktig god Chablis fra Laroche.
11/21/22, 4:22 AM - Noe lagringspotensiale på denne? Jeg har drukket flere viner fra denne produsenten i noe lavere prisskikt med stort velbehag, men er denne verdt påslaget i dag og om fem år?
10/19/22, 12:28 PM - It is here on Cellar Tracker, also known as the 100 point Parker scale. Trouble is, nobody's paying any attention to what it says any more. Except me and a few others. According to this, the average for 95+% of the wines in my cellar is "Outstanding." Maybe 5% merit that epithet. Here is the scale. Use it!:THE 100-POINT RATING SCALE(Robert Parker of the Wine Advocate describes this in more detail)Extraordinary (96-100 points)Outstanding (90-95)Very Good to Excellent (85-89)Good (80-84)Average (75-79)Below average (70-74)Avoid (50-70)
10/19/22, 12:55 PM - I've seen far worse that Bill's scale, but it assumes that there is really only one way of being worthy of, say, 92 points. That is not my experience. There are a wide variety of attributes that makes a wine outstanding, and a grand old Mosel will be so in a different way from a fresh champagne or a mature Barolo. I higher degree of generality is needed, I think. However, a more sober recognition is needed of the inflation that has taken place, and the resulting compression of the scale. It really is not serving the wine interested public well that nearly all wines worthy of cellaring get 90-95 points. Nearly all my wines average out at 91 - 93 points. Many are good but not that good, and they surely are not that similar in quality.
2/7/22, 12:49 AM - Tennis terminologi er bra! Jeg forventer i det minste å få rapportert dobbeltfeil.
2/3/22, 12:01 AM - Dear srh,I did not decant, and it was served with roast chicken, tagliatelle, sugarsnaps and a light and aromatic sauce.
2/2/22, 2:54 AM - Det var bra. En Charmes fra samme addresse i 2015-årgangen var tivoliutgaven av Meursault, med helt outrerte egenskaper helt uten harmoni.
11/22/21, 11:49 PM - Jeg har drukket mine. Den første flasken var fabelaktig, mens den andre (drukket desember 2020) var ødelagt av snik-kork.
10/27/21, 12:32 PM - I should have added that the wine was double decanted about an hour earlier. I shall see if I can edit.
3/22/21, 6:36 AM - I know it was supposed to be. 80 euros (about) out of the window.
1/15/21, 1:58 AM - Det er gjerne heftig dosage på disse syrlige engelske vinene. Jeg har noen notater på Hattingley her: https://olemski.blogspot.com/search?q=Hattingley
10/5/20, 12:59 AM - Veldig oppskrytt etter min mening, men jeg prøvde den bare en gang.
6/8/20, 3:21 AM - Hi,It's a comment based on tasting many vintages - even back to 1967 (if I remember correctly). Many excellent older bottles. I have also tasted from friends and in larger tastings of Barolo and Barbaresco with some age. My own have been from 1996 and up to 2004 (when I stopped buying). Some have been good, some have been like sausage water, one or two have been downright odd (but not really flawed). They are just too unpredictable for my further investment. I keep to Barolo for my Nebbiolo purchases now.
5/10/20, 1:28 AM - It was a 1996. I tracked that on purchase in 2002, and made a note of it.
4/11/20, 12:48 PM - Good point - but who uses this part of the scale with a sound wine these days?
12/2/18, 11:40 AM - You may open it. I have another and thus an insurance policy, as it were, but it was showing quite well now.
5/19/16, 6:47 AM - Points are a mug's game. Any way you look at it, they cannot be rationally justified. I will not even attempt something so silly. I use points mainly to record an emotion. I cannot possibly, and nor can anyone, rationally justify that any 97 is just three identical increments away from absolute wine Nirvana.
8/24/15, 9:52 AM - Had I had more bottles, you'd be welcome to them ben85.
12/15/14, 3:58 AM - This one - both. Definitely. But it's the most forward I've yet had from the vintage. Maybe to do with a restrictive sulphur regime?
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search