Community Tasting Notes 100

• ChrisWagner wrote: flawed

  January 10, 2019 - Past it’s prime and undrinkable

  Comment

• BrunelloBob wrote: 88 points

  May 24, 2018 - PnP. White flowers--daisies, white fruit--pear, peach. Mineral, asparagus. A bit more neutral/subtle than NZSB. Inoffensive, but not looking for more. age-faded?

  Comment

• ucbeau Likes this wine:

  March 10, 2017 - Found this in the cellar, decided to open it just for kicks.
  
  Pours a very pale gold, just a tiny hint of age.
  
  The nose is restrained, with tropical fruit and pear blossom. The barest hint of cut grass shows too.
  
  On the palate there is considerably more body than something from NZ and even a lot of Sancerres. It's balanced very well though, with the acidity and barrel notes working harmoniously together. There is a depth here that everyone found quite satisfying.
  
  Overall an excellent bottle that shows admirable freshness and verve for being 6.5 years old.

  Comment

• jfagan Likes this wine: 92 points

  February 28, 2015 - Light brilliant yellow. First note are of citrus--more tangerine than lemon. There is also some smoky minerality on the nose. That palate starts off rather plush but there is plenty of focus and balance to the flavors of citrus, melon and a touch of exotic spice. This lingers nicely on the palate and is quite fresh and refreshing. Drink now to 2018.

  Comment

• markcic wrote: 90 points

  January 1, 2014 - Pale yellow in color, the palate is peaches and lemon, not overly citrus with minerals and straw, a really nice finish.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 1

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2010
• Type White
• Producer Bedrock Wine Co.
• Varietal Sauvignon Blanc
• Designation n/a
• Vineyard Kick Ranch
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion Sonoma County
• Appellation Sonoma County

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 4 (1%)
• In Cellars 76 (13%)
• Consumed 527 (87%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine