• klezman wrote:

    January 21, 2017 - Starting to show some age. Hints of oxidation in this bottle. Dried cherries and cranberries. Plenty of earth and leaves. Still tasty, but if this bottle is any indication, then drink up!

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • guchl wrote: 88 points

    August 27, 2015 - A year and a half since first bottle... This one taste a bit more typical of the Willamette valley. Decent, a little hot. Still might have pegged it as California.

    Comment
  • merryberry wrote: 87 points

    June 22, 2014 - Rusty garnet. Cedar, cherry cola, and spice nose. Medium bodied, dirty raspberries, pomegranate seeds, dusty tannins, dry herbs, a bit of smoke, and a medium finish. More earthy than fruity.

    Comment
  • DugyDog Does not like this wine: 84 points

    May 8, 2014 - Thin, watery, astringent. no sense of earth or terroir at all…..would never peg this as Oregon Pinot

    Comment
  • guchl wrote: 87 points

    January 1, 2014 - How can this possibly be from Oregon?

    Comment
  • lizaambler wrote:

    June 28, 2013 - Glad it's gone. Bottled in Sonoma, not WV, Oregon. Pass.

    Comment
  • klezman wrote:

    May 17, 2013 - Tasty, but a little on the thin side. All the elements were there, though - earth, fruit, acid. A bit more acid would have been preferred.

    Comment
  • PourSomeRed wrote: 84 points

    March 31, 2013 - Light fruit with a bit a of a mineral quality. There are better Pinots out there for the money.

    Comment
  • lizaambler wrote: 85 points

    March 1, 2013 - Tastes NOTHING like a Willamette Pinot. Disappointed.

    Comment
  • Winoluver wrote: 88 points

    January 4, 2013 - Good bottle wt fruit forward not much nose. Drank wt 3 people who don't drink much wine, & they loved the lightness of it.

    Comment