Community Tasting Notes 17

• TheScottieV wrote: 94 points

  June 9, 2023 - Wow this was excellent. This is a solid 94 with some quality years still ahead. Light raspberries sitting on top of dark chocolate, silky smooth. Wish I had more.

  Comment

• Yaozi wrote: 94 points

  January 2, 2022 - I tasted the 2012 Ramey Cabernet followed by the 2010 Ramey Cabernet. Robert Parker rates the 2012 Ramey higher, but the 2010 with more longevity. I think the 2010 beats the 2012 on both counts. Both are quite good and score in the 90's. Both are well-balanced in every respect. But the 2012 is less opulent and energetic than the 2010. It is less alive and more of a museum piece then the 2010. Enough said. If you have either one you will be satisfied.

  Comment

• kend707 wrote: 88 points

  November 28, 2020 - First Ramey to ever disappoint. Mild taste of eucalyptus is distracting.

  Comment

• Red Devils wrote: 89 points

  April 22, 2020 - A little disappointing considering I loved the previous 2010 we opened (and also their excellent 2007 and 2013 vintages).
  
  A little flat, in terms of body and taste. Would not expect it to have passed its drinking window but I don’t honestly know.

  Comment

• gmbdds wrote: 92 points

  July 22, 2019 - Paired with filets. Still quite young and tannic. A good dose of black fruit and pepper in balance. I don't know the source of fruit but reminded me of Spring Mountain.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 7

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2010
• Type Red
• Producer Ramey
• Varietal Cabernet Sauvignon
• Designation Annum
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion Napa Valley
• Appellation Napa Valley
• UPC Code 185983000152

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 204 (50%)
• Consumed 201 (50%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine