Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.
Manage Subscriptions2003 Sadie Family Columella
Shiraz Blend
- South Africa
- Coastal Region
- Swartland
Community Tasting Notes 15
-
bnqwallace wrote: 91 points
March 27, 2021 - I don't think this wine is going to improve much. Still plenty of fruit and smooth tannin and quite voluptuous but the finish is getting shorter. I would say it in on the plateau but will likely go only one way.
-
gediminasbielskus Likes this wine: 90 points
December 18, 2020 - This has survived to the end quite well. Leather and a touch of tobacco. Fruit is still there, but definitely quieting down. There is something very bordeaux like about the profile on the palate which makes it quite elegant and beautiful. Drink up now, I think it is on the decline.
-
aquacongas wrote: 93 points
January 19, 2020 - Columella complete Vertical Tasting (Fritz Frau Frazi Düsseldorf): First of all it was an amazing tasting. No bottle was corked or defective. We double decanted all bottles. We drank one bottle after one. No flights. We started with the bold years but they were so good that I changed the order after 6 vintages and I mixed the elegant years in between. All old bottles delivered phantastically.
The order
2005
Still primary fruit, very balanced, starting to reach his peak, silky tannins, alcohol well integrated. 93+
2003 DMG
From this size really fresh, black berries, a bit plums, soft tannins, you feel the hot vintage but not marmelade style, easy to drink and not over the top. 92-93
2007 MG
Still some oaky notes, much fruit, somehow one dimensional and missing a bit the refreshing acidity. I would prefer 03 as a warm vintage. 90
2002
Very reluctant, it reminds me to a classic Bordeaux vintage, even the nose shows black currant and cedar wood. Delicate and elegant. Even it was one of your first vintages it is a masterpiece, really not bold and broad. At least 10 more years. Great. 95-96
2001
Great structure and ultra fresh, firm tannins. It needs decantation. Lovely fruitieness and some herbal notes. A decade ahead. 94+
2004
I had this wine a few times before. Always delivering as today again. Fresh, elegant, decanted for 2 hours, reminds me to a very good Northern Rhone wine. Great acidity structure. White pepper, dark berries, saline and firm and ripe tannins. No hurry to finish it. For many in the group WOTN. 94-95
2011
Maybe this bottle was not perfect, a bit clumsy and some acetone
2016
3 hours decantation, ultra fresh and young. Very accessible and a pure fruit. Reminds many friends to a great Burgundy, I would go for a great CF from the Loire as Clos Rougeard. Graceful 95++
2014
2 hours of decanation. Fresh, accessible, evrybody's darling from the beginning. Tannins soft, great refreshing acidity, very balanced. 94
2000
Lovely, lean, still primary fruit, spicy, pepper, dark cherries, precise finish. Starting to reach his peak. At least 5-7 more yeras ahead. 94+
2006
A bit broad and wild. A lot of fruit but missing structure and substance for a further aging. 90
2008
Balanced, in a really nice drinking window, reluctant fruit but cracking acidity. 93
2009
A bit broad, a lot fruit, alcohol perceptible, somehow one dimensional. 91
2013
Fine, elegant, great structure, a lot of acidity, reduced fruit, spicy, a monster, precise finish. A lot to come in next 2 decades. 3 hours decantation. 95+
2012
Powerful and fruit dominated, less concentrated than 2013. Balanced, niice drinking window. 92
2015
Compared to 2013 a bit more "alcoholic" and not the finesse but still powerful and spicy Northern Rhone wine. Only 1 hour of decantion. Maybe this was the "problem".94+
2010
Still young, Many in the group are flashed from this wine, for me a bit short in the finish. Not completely balanced at this stage. I guess maybe in a closed window. Great structure. 92
2017
3 hours of decantation. Fresh, alcohol percetible, maybe it was a lot of alcohol at the end of the tasting, nicely balanced in fruit and acidity, great length, precise. 93+
My Top 5
2002, 2016, 2001, 2013, 2000 -
Neecies Likes this wine: 92 points
October 30, 2016 - Dark wine with saturated blue and black fruits, spicy nose, some cedar. Served blind, it's a syrah blend but the syrah wasn't at all evident. Excellent now but not mature, and it has the tannins for further cellaring. Would put the drink-by date out to 2020.
-
David J Cooper wrote: 91 points
October 30, 2016 - Medium red. Ripe purple fruit and pepper. Becomes more complex as it opens up, scorched earth and meat but mostly blueberry and cherry. Very nice balanced finish.
Pro Reviews 3
Add a Pro ReviewVinous
-
By Stephen Tanzer
Vertical Tasting of Sadie Family Wines Columella (Jan 2015), 1/1/2015 (link)(Sadie Family Wines Columella) Subscribe to see review text.
JancisRobinson.com
-
By Tamlyn Currin
6/6/2011 (link)(Sadie Family, Columella Swartland Red) Subscribe to see review text.
Vinous
-
By Stephen Tanzer
March/April 2007, IWC Issue #131 (link)(Sadie Family Columella Swartland) Subscribe to see review text.
Wine Definition
- Vintage 2003
- Type Red
- Producer Sadie Family
- Varietal Shiraz Blend
- Designation Columella
- Vineyard n/a
- Country South Africa
- Region Coastal Region
- SubRegion Swartland
- Appellation n/a
Community Holdings
- Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
- In Cellars 130 (61%)
- Consumed 84 (39%)
Food Pairing
Who Likes This Wine
More About This Wine
Articles
- ProducerSadie Family
- VarietyShiraz Blend
- CountrySouth Africa
- SubRegionSwartland
Add Articles
- Wine2003 Sadie Family Columella (add)
- FamilySadie Family Columella (add)
- ProducerSadie Family
- VarietalShiraz Blend
- DesignationColumella (add)
- CountrySouth Africa
- RegionCoastal Region (add)
- SubRegionSwartland