Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Red

2003 Les Forts de Latour

Red Bordeaux Blend

  • France
  • Bordeaux
  • Médoc
  • Pauillac
(Add Drinking Window)
CT92.2 108 reviews
2003
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
N.V.
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2002
2002
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2002
2002
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 2001
2001
Label borrowed from 2001
2001
Label borrowed from 2001
2001
Label borrowed from 2005
2005
Label borrowed from 2005
2005

Community Tasting Notes 94

  • Darbus123 Likes this wine: 93 points

    April 11, 2024 - Lacked some elegance and a slightly hot finish, but otherwise very enjoyable. Nice tertiary notes, plenty of chocolate & tobacco.

  • Rpacker wrote: flawed

    December 27, 2023 - Corks weak

  • remyworldpeace wrote: 92 points

    July 16, 2023 - Tasted blind. St Julien? The least detailed/complex of the trio (drank alongside 2003 Pavillon Rouge and 2003 Carruades)

  • Cailles wrote: 93 points

    May 7, 2023 - Bordeaux 2003 – 20 Years On – 33 Reds: All wines tasted blind, not decanted (some wines would have needed it). Observations: 1) 2003 is not a good vintage. The wines don’t have the depth and elegance of good years. But I was positively surprised, that while it’s clearly a hot year, there are less overripe, over-extracted and prematurely dying wines than in 09/10. Still, there is no comparison to how Chateauxs handle hot years today. 2) Compared to five other vintage retrospectives, the 2003 came in last place (lower average score than 2011), with just Chateau Margaux reaching a group score above 95pts. 3) Margaux wines showed best, with the typical immediate charm, while St. Estephe and Pauillac have potential but will need more time (and/or would have needed more air). 4) Right bank wines did not show as good with some alcohol showing and a few wines being on a downhill path. I would not chase 2003 right banks.

    TN: Ripe dark fruited nose. Some herbal notes. Medium expressive but inviting. On the palate ripe dark red fruit, some caramel, roasted notes, a nice herbal component too as well as a bit of minerality. Overall with a good balance. Not the softest tannins but still with good quality, quite fresh and with medium length. Pleasant, although not too complex. When revealed, I was positively surprised – although the bigger Latour is known to be one of the wines of the vintages. Well deserved 93+pts.

    Decanting: A short decant should be enough. This was good from the go.

    Group average: 92.3 pts
    Group rank: Shared 8th out of 29 reds

    2 people found this helpful Comment
  • drjb Likes this wine: 92 points

    March 24, 2023 - This wine was a little perplexing opening somewhat dull with classic blackcurrant, dark plums and cedar but without any lift and complexity. The colour showed a surprising degree of bricking at the edges and the palate while correct and without blemish lacked any excitement. After a night under argon the second half of the bottle showed more interest and a lovely touch of stoniness and walnuts on the palate which also showed more defined structure and drive. Bottle variation or 2003 entropy ?

1 - 5 of 94 More notes

Pro Reviews 11

Add a Pro Review

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.

Manage Subscriptions

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Julia Harding, MW
    3/21/2013 (link)

    (Ch Latour, Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Winedoctor

  • By Chris Kissack
    March 2013, 3/1/2013 (link)

    (Château Latour Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    10/1/2010 (link)

    (Ch Latour, Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Rachel Shaughnessy
    7/7/2009 (link)

    (Ch Latour, Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    7/7/2009 (link)

    (Ch Latour, Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

The World of Fine Wine

  • December 2007, Issue #18 (link)

    (Les Forts de Latour) Subscribe to see review text.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2005, IWC Issue #120 (link)

    (Chateau Latour Les Forts de Latour Pauillac) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    4/7/2005 (link)

    (Ch Latour, Les Forts de Latour Pauillac Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2004, IWC Issue #114 (link)

    (Chateau Latour Les Forts de Latour Pauillac) Subscribe to see review text.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    10/7/2006 (link) 91 points

    (Les Forts de Latour) Dark garnet red color; intriguing berries and earth nose; nice, medium bodied, rich berries and caramel oak palate; medium finish

  • By Richard Jennings
    9/3/2006 (link) 92 points

    (Les Forts de Latour) Good leather nose; leather, cherry and cassis palate with balance; medium length

Wine Definition

  • Vintage 2003
  • Type Red
  • Producer Les Forts de Latour
  • Varietal Red Bordeaux Blend
  • Designation n/a
  • Vineyard n/a
  • Country France
  • Region Bordeaux
  • SubRegion Médoc
  • Appellation Pauillac

Community Holdings

  • Pending Delivery 62 (2%)
  • In Cellars 1,867 (56%)
  • Consumed 1,406 (42%)

Food Pairing

No food pairings available.

Who Likes This Wine

97% Like It  32 votes

More About This Wine

Articles

Add Articles

Report a Problem

Close
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close