• nfurlong wrote: 84 points

    July 13, 2020 - Not nearly as good as the Vita Luca it replaced.

    Comment
  • tomoem wrote: 82 points

    July 21, 2017 - Barely drinkable cabernet (wait did i say cabernet ?). I cannot tell you what this is if it wasn't for the label. Avoid

    Comment
  • Loudounwine wrote: 85 points

    August 30, 2016 - This wine is fine for what it is and what it costs. Perfectly drinkable -- not complex but tasty enough for a weeknight grilled cheese sandwich. We've paid more for wines we like less.

    Comment
  • wineracquet wrote:

    July 1, 2015 - Not nearly as bad as the 78 rating and perhaps a little better than the 85 rating so far. It is nowhere near as good as the 2005 vintage which was a steal at $10 on WTSO a few years ago. I've had 3 bottles of the 2012. Yes, one was way too fruit forward, but not quite cough syrup; The other two were slightly too fruit forward but certainly drinkable and about what you'd expect at the $13 price point. It's not any worse than the Columbia Crest 2012 Grand Estates that WS somehow rated a 90, probably a bit better.

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • Barry'sFault wrote: 78 points

    June 11, 2015 - Hard to like this one. Immediate reaction is cough syrup. 'nuff said.

    Comment
  • Barry'sFault Likes this wine: 85 points

    April 13, 2015 - A little rough, but overall nice little BBQ wine. Nothing special.

    Comment