• gggboss wrote: 89 points

    November 16, 2019 - 50% oak ...little spicy finish,very good!

    Comment
  • Jasonandtiffanyscellar wrote: 87 points

    April 6, 2018 - Uncomplicated European Chardonnay. No oak, 5/10 acidy. Low fruit and mineral. French, clean and refreshing.

    Comment
  • RN wrote: 86 points

    January 16, 2018 - No wow but then again no obvious holes or faults. Well made and enjoyable for the price. Even a little spice on the finish.

    Comment
  • oyvind_norway wrote: 88 points

    May 20, 2017 - Fresh and flowery on the nose, and also green fruits.
    In the mouth very fresh and balanced acidity to begin with. On the finish a fresh and fine taste of peach and pineapple. Lasting well and leaves a clean and pleasant feeling in the mouth

  • vespasian wrote:

    January 25, 2017 - Very creamy and 'appley' on the nose. Hint of golden ripeness, oatmeal. Very charming; good mid-palate richness here. Smooth and creamy. Lovely now with good richness though needs food really.

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • manamong wrote: 84 points

    January 13, 2017 - Enjoyable~~

    Comment
  • OzielDelAngel Likes this wine: 85 points

    December 23, 2016 - Vino muy ligero; fresco y fue excelente con el carpaccio de salmón que comí

    Comment
  • LPEG wrote: 87 points

    November 25, 2016 - Jadot BB Couvent des Jacobins 2014. Fresh og fruktig nese. Noe gul frukt med en anelse ananas på den positive siden, epler og mineraler. Flott syre, medium lengde. Ikke merkbar eik. Ingen unoter, ren og pen. Oppfattes som noe tyngre når temperaturen stiger. Crowdpleaser og flott QPR! Garantert gjenkjøp. 87+

    Comment
  • KarinJ wrote: 75 points

    September 9, 2016 - Typisk. Men inte så spännande

    Comment
  • wheatacus Likes this wine: 86 points

    August 19, 2016 - Solid Chard, but more oak and butter than expected- but much less than an American style. Fresh, with some mineral. We had this with Chanterelle pasta- omg was it a perfect match. Used Mapiano chard for the cooking though, as that's much more oaked.

    Comment